Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S.J. Doubler
When learners learn on‐line, what does the facilitator do?
Shirley Bennett, Debra Marsh (2002)
Are We Expecting Online Tutors to Run Before They Can Walk?Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39
K. Littleton, Denise Whitelock (2004)
Guiding the Creation of Knowledge and Understanding in a Virtual Learning EnvironmentCyberpsychology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society, 7 2
G. Salmon (2001)
Psychological and group learning perspectives: their relevance to e-learning
K. Issroff, E. Scanlon (2002)
Using technology in Higher Education: an Activity Theory perspectiveJ. Comput. Assist. Learn., 18
E. Barrett, V. Lally (1999)
Gender differences in an on-line learning environmentJ. Comput. Assist. Learn., 15
J. Konrad
Review of educational research on virtual learning environments (VLE) – implications for the improvement of teaching and learning and access to formal learning in Europe
E. Barratt, V. Lally
Gender differences in an on‐line environment
M. Lecompte, J. Goetz (1982)
Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic ResearchReview of Educational Research, 52
E. Browne
Conversations in cyberspace: a study of learning
J. Stephenson (2003)
A Review of Research and Practice in E-Learning in the Work-Place and Proposals for Its Effective Use.
V. Lally
Analysing teaching and learning interactions in a networked collaborative learning environment: issues and work in progress
W. Harlen, S.J. Doubler
Learning about learning from an on‐line course
L. Teles, S. Ashton, T. Roberts, I. Tzoneva
The role of the instructor in e‐learning collaborative environments
J. Sinclair, R. Coulthard (1975)
Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils
J.F. Hartley
Case studies in organizational research
N. Pachler, C. Daly
Computer‐mediated communication and teachers' professional learning
Chris Smith, H. Whiteley, S. Smith (1999)
Using email for teachingComput. Educ., 33
P. Tynjälä, P. Häkkinen (2005)
E‐learning at work: theoretical underpinnings and pedagogical challengesJournal of Workplace Learning, 17
Z. Berge (1995)
Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field.Educational Technology archive, 35
P. Light, C. Colbourn, Vivienne Light (1997)
Computer mediated tutorial support for conventional university coursesJ. Comput. Assist. Learn., 13
S. Bennett, D. Marsh
Are we expecting tutors to run before they can walk?
Elizabeth Browne (2003)
Conversations in Cyberspace: a study of online learningOpen Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 18
M. Coomey, J. Stephenson
On‐line learning: it is all about dialogue, involvement, support and control‐according to research
N. King
Template analysis
F. Henri
Computer conferencing and content analysis
D. Laurillard (1993)
Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology
S. Booth, M. Hultén (2003)
Opening dimensions of variation: An empirical study of learning in Web-based discussion
T. Wilson, Denise Whitelock (1998)
What are the perceived benefits of participating in a computer-mediated communication (CMC) environment for distance learning computer science students?Comput. Educ., 30
M. Thorburn (2003)
The effects of an integrated curriculum model on teachers’ pedagogy practices. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association (BERA) Annual Conference, September 11th, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh.
A. Macpherson, Gill Homan, K. Wilkinson (2006)
The Implementation and Use of E-Learning in the Corporate UniversityJournal of Workplace Learning, 17
Purpose – The aim of this paper is to describe a study of online, asynchronous dialogues between tutors and nine work‐based postgraduate learners on learning through work (LtW) programmes. Design/methodology/approach – Adopting a constructivist perspective and using a qualitative approach, 670 messages were segmented into semantic units and categorised by activity and content. Analysis borrowed from content and discourse approaches and categories were grounded in the data. Findings – Online exchanges were found to mirror those of effective face‐to‐face learning encounters. Learners asked questions, reported on their progress and plans, sought and gave feedback, and disclosed personal information and feelings. Tutors gave direct answers, advised and made suggestions, explained and elaborated, offered signposting and referral and provided feedback. Dialogue content was categorised as administrative/organisational, technical, affective, social, academic or relating to programme design. Research limitations/implications – Learners embarking on undergraduate level study may raise different issues from those working at postgraduate level. Practical implications – The individual categories and the framework as a whole may help new online tutors to anticipate and prepare for their role. Originality/value – The study is unusual in focusing on one‐to‐one online dialogues between university tutors and work‐based learners. The unique contribution is a hierarchical analytical framework of dialogue topics in which “hard” and “soft” topics underpin academic dialogue.
Journal of Workplace Learning – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 1, 2006
Keywords: Learning; Workplace learning; Distance learning; Computer based learning; E‐learning
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.