Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Walther (1995)
Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over TimeOrganization Science, 6
J. Liedtka (1999)
Linking Competitive Advantage with Communities of PracticeJournal of Management Inquiry, 8
C. Kimble, P. Hildreth (2006)
Limits of Communities of Practice
R. Grant (2001)
Knowledge and Organization
T. Erickson (1997)
Social interaction on the Net: virtual community as participatory genreProceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 6
R. Rice (1988)
Collection and analysis of data from communication system networks
P. Duguid (2005)
“The Art of Knowing”: Social and Tacit Dimensions of Knowledge and the Limits of the Community of PracticeThe Information Society, 21
P. Earley (1989)
Social Loafing and Collectivism: A Comparison of the United States and the People's Republic of China.Administrative Science Quarterly, 34
J. Lave, E. Wenger (1991)
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Carsten Østerlund, P. Carlile (2005)
Relations in Practice: Sorting Through Practice Theories on Knowledge Sharing in Complex OrganizationsThe Information Society, 21
R. Bagozzi, U. Dholakia (2002)
Intentional social action in virtual communitiesJournal of Interactive Marketing, 16
(1998)
Sloan Management Review
Mark Granovetter (1973)
The Strength of Weak TiesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 78
M. Markus (1994)
Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial ChoiceOrganization Science, 5
Thomas Schwen, N. Hara (2003)
Community of Practice: A Metaphor for Online Design?The Information Society, 19
T. Erickson, Wendy Kellog (2001)
Knowledge Communities: Online Environments for Supporting Knowledge Management and its Social Contex
E. Wenger, W. Snyder (2000)
Communities of Practice: The Organizational FrontierHarvard Business Review, 78
Snejina Michailova, K. Hutchings (2006)
National Cultural Influences on Knowledge Sharing: A Comparison of China and RussiaWiley-Blackwell: Journal of Management Studies
M. Zanjani, F. Alami (2009)
Critical Success Factors of Communities of Practice in an Asian Leading Educational InstituteAsian Journal of Information Management, 3
R. Kling, Christina Courtright (2003)
Group Behavior and Learning in Electronic Forums: A Sociotechnical ApproachThe Information Society, 19
J. Brown, P. Duguid (1991)
Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and InnovationOrganization Science, 2
T. Erickson, David Smith, W. Kellogg, M. Laff, J. Richards, Erin Bradner (1999)
Socially translucent systems: social proxies, persistent conversation, and the design of “babble”
J. Brown (1998)
Internet technology in support of the concept of “communities-of-practice”: the case of XeroxAccounting, Management and Information Technologies, 8
M. Wasko, Samer Faraj (2005)
Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of PracticeMIS Q., 29
David Constant, L. Sproull, S. Kiesler (1996)
The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice
J. Donath, Karrie Karahalios, F. Viégas (1999)
Visualizing conversationProceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers, Track2
W. Orlikowski, J. Yates (1994)
Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in OrganizationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 39
E. Wenger (1998)
Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity
To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: reprints@emeraldinsight.com Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints
(2000)
Four smart ways to run online communities
J. Yates, W. Orlikowski (1992)
Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and MediaAcademy of Management Review, 17
C. Steinfield (1986)
Computer-Mediated Communication in an Organizational Setting: Explaining Task-Related and Socioemotional UsesAnnals of the International Communication Association, 9
Alexander Ardichvili, M. Maurer, Wei Li, T. Wentling, Reed Stuedemann (2006)
Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practiceJ. Knowl. Manag., 10
J. Wagner (1995)
Studies of Individualism-Collectivism: Effects on Cooperation in GroupsAcademy of Management Journal, 38
B. Butler (2001)
Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social StructuresInf. Syst. Res., 12
L. Sproull, S. Kiesler (1986)
Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication
J. Brown, P. Duguid (2001)
Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice PerspectiveOrganization Science, 12
Quentin Jones (2006)
Virtual-Communities, Virtual Settlements & Cyber-Archaeology: A Theoretical OutlineJ. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 3
P. Hildreth, C. Kimble, Peter Wright (2000)
Communities of practice in the distributed international environmentJ. Knowl. Manag., 4
N. Baym (1999)
Tune In, Log On: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community
T. Davenport, L. Prusak (1998)
Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they knowUbiquity, 2000
Andrew Cox (2005)
What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal worksJournal of Information Science, 31
H. Thomas, W. David, C. Michael (1998)
SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTSSloan Management Review, 39
John Carlson, R. Zmud (1999)
Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness PerceptionsAcademy of Management Journal, 42
Thomas Finholt, L. Sproull (1990)
Electronic Groups at Work.Organization Science, 1
M. Thompson (2005)
Structural and Epistemic Parameters in Communities of PracticeOrgan. Sci., 16
R. Daft, R. Lengel (1986)
Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural designManagement Science, 32
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate to which extent the concept of communities of practice (CoPs) can be applied to online communities and to explore how organizations can better utilize online social structures for their knowledge management practice. Design/methodology/approach – A case study was used to examine an online community with the practice‐and‐identity framework that characterizes conventional CoPs. Qualitative data analysis was conducted primarily on 7,853 messages downloaded from the online community during a six week period. Findings – The results showed how an online community could manifest the practice and identity characteristics of conventional CoPs as community members actively engaged in their shared practice and identity development while pursuing a joint enterprise. Research limitations/implications – The study was conducted in a single Chinese online community on traveling, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Practical implications – This study suggested how organizations can nurture online CoPs. In addition, a hierarchical model was proposed to help organizations identify the appropriate online social structure for their knowledge management purposes. Originality/value – This study empirically verified that CoPs can emerge from online communities and demonstrated that the concept of CoPs can be used to guide knowledge sharing and knowledge creation in online environments.
Journal of Knowledge Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 18, 2008
Keywords: Online operations; Communities; Knowledge sharing; China
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.