Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Campbell, M. Goldman (1984)
USSR in Crisis: The Failure of an Economic System.Political Science Quarterly, 99
B. Ward, A. Nove (1962)
The Soviet Economy.Economica, 29
E. Raiklin
The movement of prices and real output production in the Russian federation (1991‐1993)
E. Raiklin
Osnovy Ekonomicheskoi Teorii. Mikroekonomicheskaia Teoria Rynkov Produktsii
W. Adams (2018)
Adam Smith Goes to Moscow
G. Marshall (1983)
Ussr In Crisis
A. Nove (1969)
The Soviet Economy: An Introduction.
J. Campbell, M. Voslensky (1984)
Nomenklatura: The Soviet Ruling ClassForeign Affairs, 63
N. Shmelyov
Advances and debts
W. Adams, J.W. Brock
Adam Smith Goes to Moscow. A Dialogue on Radical Reform
E. Raiklin (1993)
The Disintegration of the Soviet UnionInternational Journal of Social Economics, 20
N. Shmelyev
Novoye ‐ Khorosho Zabytoie Staroie
V. Sirotkin
Nomenklatura v Istoricheskom Razreze
M. Goldman (1983)
U.S.S.R. in crisis: The failure of an economic system
G. Kleiner
Sovremennaia Ekonomika Rossii kak ‘Ekonomika Fizicheskikh Lits’
M. Goldman (1994)
Lost Opportunity: Why Economic Reforms in Russia Have Not Worked
P. Gregory, R. Stuart (1994)
Soviet and post-Soviet economic structure and performance
The purposes of this paper is purely theoretical. Its goal is to establish some rules governing the short‐run employment of productive resources by the enterprise in the Soviet and post‐Soviet setting. Accordingly, the paper is divided into two parts. The first portion of the paper deals with the behavior of the enterprise as the short‐run user of productive resources within a framework of the Soviet economic model of state ownership of non‐labor economic resources and mandatory central planning. Such an enterprise is termed the Soviet enterprise. In the second part, the paper examines how the former Soviet enterprise exploits factors of production during the current transitional period of the disintegration of the Soviet economic model in modern Russia. This enterprise is called the post‐Soviet enterprise. The paper utilizes the marginalist microeconomic tools of the analysis. In this, the paper applies the traditional neoclassical approach to the nontraditional economic structure of the Soviet and post‐Soviet periods.
International Journal of Social Economics – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 1, 1998
Keywords: Monopolies; Post‐Soviet; Resources; Russia; Soviet
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.