Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Miles, A. Huberman (1994)
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
E. Guba, Y. Lincoln (2005)
Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences.
S. Sambrook, J. Stewart (2007)
Human resource development in the public sector : the case of health and social care
Marjolein Berings, A. Doornbos, P.Robert-Jan Simons (2006)
Methodological practices in on-the-job learning researchHuman Resource Development International, 9
C. Weston, T. Gandell, J. Beauchamp, L. McAlpine, C. Wiseman, C. Beauchamp (2001)
Analyzing Interview Data: The Development and Evolution of a Coding SystemQualitative Sociology, 24
Marjolein Berings, R. Poell, P.Robert-Jan Simons (2005)
Conceptualizing On-the-Job Learning StylesHuman Resource Development Review, 4
H. Koopmans, A. Doornbos, I. Eekelen (2006)
Learning in Interactive Work Situations: It Takes Two to Tango; Why Not Invite Both Partners to Dance?.Human Resource Development Quarterly, 17
S. Tannenbaum (1997)
Enhancing continuous learning: Diagnostic findings from multiple companiesHuman Resource Management, 36
C. Estabrooks, W. Rutakumwa, Katherine O'Leary, J. Profetto-Mcgrath, M. Milner, M. Levers, S. Scott-Findlay (2005)
Sources of Practice Knowledge Among NursesQualitative Health Research, 15
R. Bernstein (1983)
Beyond objectivism and relativism
K. Collin (2002)
Development Engineers' Conceptions of Learning at WorkStudies in Continuing Education, 24
A. Strauss, J. Corbin (1998)
Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
Kirsi Heikkila (2001)
Different ways of learning at work
M. Eraut (2000)
Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work.The British journal of educational psychology, 70 ( Pt 1)
S. Bakken, C. Mead (1997)
Review: Nursing Classification Systems: Necessary but not Sufficient for Representing "What Nurses Do" for Inclusion in Computer-based Patient Record SystemsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 4 3
J. Lave, E. Wenger (1991)
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
C. Clarke, J. Wilcockson (2002)
Seeing need and developing care: exploring knowledge for and from practice.International journal of nursing studies, 39 4
E. O'Shea (2003)
Self-directed learning in nurse education: a review of the literature.Journal of advanced nursing, 43 1
R. Gerber (1998)
How do workers learn in their workThe Learning Organization, 5
R. Poell, K. Dam, P. Berg (2004)
Organising Learning in Work ContextsApplied Psychology, 53
S. Lawton, P. Wimpenny (2003)
Continuing professional development: a review.Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987), 17 24
Marjolein Berings (2006)
On-the-job learning styles: Conceptualization and instrument development for the nursing profession
S. Bolhuis (2000)
Naar zelfstandig leren: wat doen en denken docenten?
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to gain more insight into employees' on‐the‐job learning. Its specific purpose is to develop and validate a classification of on‐the‐job learning activities and learning themes, focusing on the nursing profession in particular. Design/methodology/approach – Two successive studies were conducted for this purpose. In the first study in‐depth interviews with 20 Dutch nurses were analysed using a grounded theory approach. The content validity of the categories found in the first study was investigated in the second study by interviewing 17 supervisors and eight educators from different hospitals in The Netherlands. Findings – The paper finds that the main categories of learning activities are: learning by doing one's regular job, learning by applying something new in the job, learning by social interaction with colleagues, learning by theory or supervision, and learning by reflection. First‐order learning activities and second‐order learning activities can be distinguished. The main categories of on‐the‐job learning themes are: the technical‐practical domain, the socio‐emotional domain, the organisational domain, the developmental domain, and a pro‐active attitude to work. Research limitations/implications – The validation study was conducted by the same researchers as the first study. The findings are based on one profession (nursing) in one country (The Netherlands). Practical implications – The categories can be used by nurse educators and health sector managers/trainers to develop comprehensive and structured intervention methods for the improvement of on‐the‐job learning which do justice to the complexity and diversity of on‐the‐job learning by nurses. HR (development) professionals can use the classification as part of a competence management and development system. Originality/value – The study provides a detailed, complete and multi‐dimensional explication of nurses' on‐the‐job learning activities and learning themes, grounding the classification and framework in empirical data and using multiple data sources.
Personnel Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 6, 2008
Keywords: Classification; Learning methods; Learning processes; Nursing; Workplace learning
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.