Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

ON THE INVERSE RELATIONSHIP OF RECALL AND PRECISION

ON THE INVERSE RELATIONSHIP OF RECALL AND PRECISION It is now ten years since some slight experimental evidence was presented which appeared to support the hypothesis that there was an inverse relationship between recall and precision. The idea of this was certainly not new Fairthorne had more than implied it in his discussions on OBNA and ABNO systems, i.e. OnlyButNotAll high precision and AllButNotOnly high recall. However, it was one of the propositions arising from Cranfield I which met with strong opposition and was quite rightly attacked. In reply to the critical review by Swanson, I had to agree that the simple hypothesis required modification. By the following year test results coming from the experiments by Salton and from Cranfield II made further modification necessary, and the hypothesis was finally put forward to read as follows Within a single system, assuming that a sequence of subsearches for a particular question is made in the logical order of expected decreasing precision, and the requirements are those stated in the question, there is an inverse relationship between recall and precision, if the results of a number of different searches are averaged. This, it will be noted, has four important qualifications to the basic statement. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Documentation Emerald Publishing

ON THE INVERSE RELATIONSHIP OF RECALL AND PRECISION

CLEVERDON, CYRIL W.
Journal of Documentation , Volume 28 (3): 7 – Mar 1, 1972
Download PDF
7 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/on-the-inverse-relationship-of-recall-and-precision-qJDmWdb3gp

References (2)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0022-0418
DOI
10.1108/eb026538
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

It is now ten years since some slight experimental evidence was presented which appeared to support the hypothesis that there was an inverse relationship between recall and precision. The idea of this was certainly not new Fairthorne had more than implied it in his discussions on OBNA and ABNO systems, i.e. OnlyButNotAll high precision and AllButNotOnly high recall. However, it was one of the propositions arising from Cranfield I which met with strong opposition and was quite rightly attacked. In reply to the critical review by Swanson, I had to agree that the simple hypothesis required modification. By the following year test results coming from the experiments by Salton and from Cranfield II made further modification necessary, and the hypothesis was finally put forward to read as follows Within a single system, assuming that a sequence of subsearches for a particular question is made in the logical order of expected decreasing precision, and the requirements are those stated in the question, there is an inverse relationship between recall and precision, if the results of a number of different searches are averaged. This, it will be noted, has four important qualifications to the basic statement.

Journal

Journal of Documentation – Emerald Publishing

Published: Mar 1, 1972

There are no references for this article.