Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Occupants’ satisfaction and perceived productivity in open-plan offices designed to support activity-based working: findings from different industry sectors

Occupants’ satisfaction and perceived productivity in open-plan offices designed to support... In the rise of offices designed to support activity-based working (ABW), parts of industry have fully transitioned to open-plan environments and then later to unassigned seating, whereas other parts, such as tertiary education, are still in the process of moving away from individual offices. There are a few relevant studies to understand how occupants from industry sectors with different levels of adoption of ABW perceived environments designed to support this way of working. This paper aims to contribute to the knowledge gap by providing insight into workers’ satisfaction and dissatisfaction from open-plan offices designed to support ABW along with the key predictors of perceived productivity.Design/methodology/approachA data set of 2,090 post-occupancy evaluation surveys conducted in five sectors – tertiary education, finance, construction, property/asset management and design/engineering – was analyzed. ANOVA and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted for the survey questionnaires. First, ANOVA tests were conducted for the whole sample with perceived productivity as the dependent variable. A seven-point Likert scale with five theoretical factors was generated with all survey questionnaires. CFA was performed to show the factor loadings. In addition, regression analyses were carried out for each of factor item taken as the independent variable, where perceived productivity was the dependent variable. Key sources of satisfaction and dissatisfaction per sector were analyzed and differences between occupants reporting a negative or positive impact on their productivity were also investigated. Finally, open-ended comments were analyzed to show the key sources of dissatisfaction based on open-ended comments.FindingsWorkers from construction were the most satisfied, followed by finance and tertiary education. Occupants from all industry sectors consistently rated their workspaces highly on biophilic and interior design. Distraction and privacy received the lowest scores from all sectors. Open-ended comments showed mismatches between spatial and behavioral dimensions of ABW both for satisfaction and perceived productivity. Interior design was the strongest predictor for perceived productivity for all sectors. Findings dispel the notion that ABW implementation may not be suitable for certain industries, as long as the three key pillars of ABW are fully implemented, including design, behavior and technology.Originality/valueThis paper provides insight into workers’ satisfaction and dissatisfaction from open-plan offices designed to support ABW in different industry sectors along with the key predictors of perceived productivity. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Corporate Real Estate Emerald Publishing

Occupants’ satisfaction and perceived productivity in open-plan offices designed to support activity-based working: findings from different industry sectors

Download PDF
24 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/occupants-satisfaction-and-perceived-productivity-in-open-plan-offices-mTK7f5JB30
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1463-001X
DOI
10.1108/jcre-06-2020-0027
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In the rise of offices designed to support activity-based working (ABW), parts of industry have fully transitioned to open-plan environments and then later to unassigned seating, whereas other parts, such as tertiary education, are still in the process of moving away from individual offices. There are a few relevant studies to understand how occupants from industry sectors with different levels of adoption of ABW perceived environments designed to support this way of working. This paper aims to contribute to the knowledge gap by providing insight into workers’ satisfaction and dissatisfaction from open-plan offices designed to support ABW along with the key predictors of perceived productivity.Design/methodology/approachA data set of 2,090 post-occupancy evaluation surveys conducted in five sectors – tertiary education, finance, construction, property/asset management and design/engineering – was analyzed. ANOVA and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted for the survey questionnaires. First, ANOVA tests were conducted for the whole sample with perceived productivity as the dependent variable. A seven-point Likert scale with five theoretical factors was generated with all survey questionnaires. CFA was performed to show the factor loadings. In addition, regression analyses were carried out for each of factor item taken as the independent variable, where perceived productivity was the dependent variable. Key sources of satisfaction and dissatisfaction per sector were analyzed and differences between occupants reporting a negative or positive impact on their productivity were also investigated. Finally, open-ended comments were analyzed to show the key sources of dissatisfaction based on open-ended comments.FindingsWorkers from construction were the most satisfied, followed by finance and tertiary education. Occupants from all industry sectors consistently rated their workspaces highly on biophilic and interior design. Distraction and privacy received the lowest scores from all sectors. Open-ended comments showed mismatches between spatial and behavioral dimensions of ABW both for satisfaction and perceived productivity. Interior design was the strongest predictor for perceived productivity for all sectors. Findings dispel the notion that ABW implementation may not be suitable for certain industries, as long as the three key pillars of ABW are fully implemented, including design, behavior and technology.Originality/valueThis paper provides insight into workers’ satisfaction and dissatisfaction from open-plan offices designed to support ABW in different industry sectors along with the key predictors of perceived productivity.

Journal

Journal of Corporate Real Estate – Emerald Publishing

Published: Mar 8, 2021

Keywords: Activity-based working; Post-occupancy evaluation; Indoor environmental quality; Workspace design; Workspace design; Open-plan office; Perceived productivity

References

  • Room to roam: costing commercial fit-out for activity-based working
  • An end-user’s perspective on activity-based office concepts
    Appel-Meulenbroek, R.; Groenen, P.; Janssen, I.
  • The impact of activity based working (ABW) on workplace activity, eating behaviors, productivity, and satisfaction
    Arundell, L.; Sudholz, B.; Teychenne, M.; Salmon, J.; Hayward, B.; Healy, G.N.; Timperio, A.
  • From fading novelty effects to emergent appreciation of activity-based flexible offices: comparing the individual, organizational and spatial adaptations in two case organizations
    Babapour, M.
  • Open office space: the wave of the future for academic health centers?
    Barnes, J.; Wineman, J.; Adler, N.
  • Office type in relation to health, well-being, and job satisfaction among employees
    Bodin Danielsson, C.; Bodin, L.
  • Accommodating new ways of working: lessons from best practices and worst cases
    Brunia, S.; de Been, I.; van der Voordt, T.J.M.
  • Employee satisfaction with the physical work environment: the importance of a need-based approach
    Budie, B.; Appel-Meulenbroek, R.; Kemperman, A.; Weijs-Perree, M.
  • The rise of office design in high-performance, open-plan environments
    Candido, C.; Chakraborty, P.; Tjondronegoro, D.
  • BOSSA: a multidimensional post-occupancy evaluation tool
    Candido, C.; Kim, J.; de Dear, R.; Thomas, L.
  • Designing healthy workspaces: results from Australian certified open-plan offices
    Candido, C.; Marzban, S.; Haddad, S.; Mackey, M.; Loder, A.
  • Designing activity-based workspaces: satisfaction, productivity and physical activity
    Candido, C.; Thomas, L.; Haddad, S.; Zhang, F.; Mackey, M.; Ye, W.
  • Impact of workspace layout on occupant satisfaction, perceived health and productivity
    Candido, C.; Zhang, J.; Kim, J.; de Dear, R.; Thomas, L.; Strapasson, P.; Joko, C.
  • Workspace preferences and non-preferences in activity-based flexible offices: two case studies
    Chafi, M.B.; Harder, M.; Danielsson, C.B.
  • The physical environment of the office: contemporary and emerging issues
    Davis, M.C.; Leach, D.J.; Clegg, C.W.; Hodgkinson, G.P.; Ford, J.K.
  • The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support
    De Been, I.; Beijer, M.
  • How to cope with dilemmas in activity-based work environments: results from user-centred research
    De Been, I.; Beijer, M.; den Hollander, D.
  • Attitude towards NWOW and activity based working – activity patterns and change perspectives
    De Kok, A.; Zwieten, J.; Helms, R.
  • Creative workspaces – a fad or making real impact?
    De Paoli, D.; Ropo, A.
  • Front and backstage in the workplace: an explorative case study on activity-based working and employee perceptions of control over work-related demands
    Ekstrand, M.; Damman, S.
  • The US workplace survey 2020 – the challenges of navigating unassigned seating
  • Need–supply fit in an activity-based flexible office: a longitudinal study during relocation
    Gerdenitsch, C.; Korunka, C.; Hertel, G.
  • Exploring mobility and workplace choice in a flexible office through post-occupancy evaluation
    Göçer, Ö.; Göçer, K.; Ergöz Karahan, E.; İlhan Oygür, I.
  • The effects of moving into an activity-based office on communication, social relations and work demands – a controlled intervention with repeated follow-up
    Haapakangas, A.; Hallman, D.M.; Mathiassen, S.E.; Jahncke, H.
  • Flexibility in use: switching behaviour and satisfaction in activity-based work environments
    Hoendervanger, J.G.; De Been, I.; Van Yperen, N.W.; Mobach, M.P.; Albers, C.J.
  • Relationship between workplace spatial settings and occupant-perceived support for collaboration
    Hua, Y.; Loftness, V.; Heerwagen, J.H.; Powell, K.M.
  • Performance-oriented office environments – framework for effective workspace design and the accompanying change processes
    Kämpf-Dern, A.; Konkol, J.
  • Employee satisfaction with working space and its association with well-being – a cross-sectional study in a multi-space office
    Lusa, S.; Käpykangas, S.M.; Ansio, H.; Houni, P.; Uitti, J.
  • Towards responsible workplace innovation: the rise of NWW in public knowledge organizations and their impact on governance
    Medik, V.L.; Stettina, C.J.
  • Relocation to an activity-based flexible office – design processes and outcomes
    Rolfö, L.V.
  • Concentration requirements modify the effect of office type on indicators of health and performance
    Seddigh, A.; Berntson, E.; Bodin Danielson, C.; Westerlund, H.
  • Relationship between attributes of individual workers and concentration at work
    Sugino, R.; Tanabe, S.; Takahashi, M.; Tokumura, T.; Wada, K.; Kuroki, T.; Nakagawa, J.; Shinoda, J.; Shinoyama, T.
  • Productivity and employee satisfaction in flexible workplaces
    Van der Voordt, T.
  • One Shelley street Macquarie bank
  • The impact of new working practices on employee productivity: the first exploratory study in Asia
    Wadu Mesthrige, J.; Chiang, Y.H.
  • Designing work: collaboration versus concentration in open plan workspaces?
    Walsh, J.
  • The relation between activity-based work environments and office workers’ job attitudes and vitality
    Wohlers, C.; Hartner-Tiefenthaler, M.; Hertel, G.
  • Differences in occupants' satisfaction and perceived productivity in high- and low-performance offices
    Göçer, Ö.; Candido, C.; Thomas, L.; Göçer, K.
  • Desk ownership in the workplace: the effect of non-territorial working on employee workplace satisfaction, perceived productivity and health
    Kim, J.; Candido, C.; Thomas, L.; de Dear, R.