Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Numerical implementations of the FEM‐DBCI integral equation

Numerical implementations of the FEM‐DBCI integral equation Purpose – This paper aims to discuss various numerical implementations of the integral equation in the hybrid finite element method‐Dirichlet boundary condition iteration (FEM‐DBCI) method for the numerical solution of unbounded static and quasi‐static electromagnetic field problems. Design/methodology/approach – Three numerical implementations are described and compared from the point of view of accuracy and complexity, by means of two examples regarding simple electrostatic problems. Findings – The implementation by means of a pair of integration surfaces made of element sides leads to accuracy levels which are much better than that of a single surface (made of element sides) and only a little worse than that of a single surface connecting point in the middle of finite element sides. Practical implications – The former implementations, however, are simpler since they are practically the same as that of a standard boundary element method integral equation. Originality/value – The paper constitutes a useful guide to the implementation of the FEM‐DBCI method. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering Emerald Publishing

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/numerical-implementations-of-the-fem-dbci-integral-equation-AjtaZvEalk
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0332-1649
DOI
10.1108/03321640810878298
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to discuss various numerical implementations of the integral equation in the hybrid finite element method‐Dirichlet boundary condition iteration (FEM‐DBCI) method for the numerical solution of unbounded static and quasi‐static electromagnetic field problems. Design/methodology/approach – Three numerical implementations are described and compared from the point of view of accuracy and complexity, by means of two examples regarding simple electrostatic problems. Findings – The implementation by means of a pair of integration surfaces made of element sides leads to accuracy levels which are much better than that of a single surface (made of element sides) and only a little worse than that of a single surface connecting point in the middle of finite element sides. Practical implications – The former implementations, however, are simpler since they are practically the same as that of a standard boundary element method integral equation. Originality/value – The paper constitutes a useful guide to the implementation of the FEM‐DBCI method.

Journal

COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic EngineeringEmerald Publishing

Published: Jul 11, 2008

Keywords: Integral equations; Finite element analysis; Electromagnetic fields

References