Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Becker (1992)
Places for PluralismEthics, 102
Shorey Peterson, A. Berle, G. Means (1933)
The Modern Corporation and Private Property.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 28
D. Crowther (2003)
Creating Shareholder Value
Amitai Etzioni (1998)
A Communitarian Note on Stakeholder TheoryBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 8
J. Child (1974)
MANAGERIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPANY PERFORMANCE PART IJournal of Management Studies, 11
C. Emmanuel, D. Otley, K. Merchant (1990)
Accounting for Management Control
V. Roberts (1994)
Is authority a dirty word? some dilemmas in idealistic organisationsJournal of Social Work Practice, 8
J. Habermas, J. Shapiro (1972)
Knowledge and Human Interests
T. Donaldson (1989)
The ethics of international business
T. Brignall, L. Fitzgerald, R. Johnston, R. Silvestro (1992)
Performance Measurement in Service Businesses
I. Herremans, Parporn Akathaporn, Morris McInnes (1993)
An investigation of corporate social responsibility reputation and economic performanceAccounting Organizations and Society, 18
H. Smith, John Hasnas (1999)
Ethics and Information Systems: The Corporate DomainMIS Q., 23
K. Eisenhardt (1989)
Agency Theory: An Assessment and ReviewAcademy of Management Review, 14
Elaine Sternberg (1998)
Corporate Governance - Accountability in the Marketplace
W. Friedmann, A. Guest (1961)
Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence.The Philosophical Quarterly, 12
J. Coates (1993)
Corporate performance evaluation in multinationals
S. White, T. Mitchell (1976)
Organization Development: A Review of Research Content and Research DesignAcademy of Management Review, 1
J. Child (1975)
MANAGERIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPANY PERFORMANCE‐PART II. A CONTINGENCY ANALYSISJournal of Management Studies, 12
T. Tinker (1985)
Paper prophets: A social critique of accounting
M. Briers, M. Hirst (1990)
The role of budgetary information in performance evaluationAccounting Organizations and Society, 15
T. Veblen (1901)
The Theory of the Leisure Class
W. Dugger (1987)
The Economic Institutions of CapitalismJournal of Economic Issues, 21
T. Donaldson (1982)
Corporations and morality
D. Crowther (2000)
Corporate Reporting, Stakeholders and the Internet: Mapping the New Corporate LandscapeUrban Studies, 37
John Hasnas (1998)
The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the PerplexedBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 8
Richard Marens, A. Wicks (1999)
Getting Real: Stakeholder Theory, Managerial Practice, and the General Irrelevance of Fiduciary Duties Owed to ShareholdersBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 9
K. Goodpaster (1991)
Business Ethics and Stakeholder AnalysisBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 1
S. Freud (1933)
New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis
Purpose – Agency Theory is normally used to explain the relationship between the managers of a corporation and its owners, or shareholders, and to legitimate the payment of share options, and other remuneration mechanisms, to those managers on the basis that this will align the interests of the managers of a corporation with those of its owners. The paper aims to argue that this outworn legitimation is not just based on a bankrupt theory but is actually deleterious to corporate performance, managerial behaviour and the relationship between managers, shareholders and other stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach – The approach is to examine the behaviour of the managers of The Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies (“Shell”) as they have continued to reinterpret accounting regulations, reclassify oil reserves and re‐report past and probable/possible future performance of the company. Findings – The argument is predicated in the assertion that in the relationship between owners and managers of such a corporation there are actually no principals and therefore there can be no agents. Furthermore, the rewards structure developed from the theory provides a motivation for managerial misrepresentation leading to a situation in which principles are defunct. The Social Contract between all stakeholders to a corporation has been reinvigorated as a basis for sustainable performance, with consequent implications for the behaviour of all parties to the contract. Originality/value – The paper illustrates that evidence abounds showing that corporations do not have any sense of social responsibility and do not feel constrained by any kind of ethical code, no matter what their corporate literature states, but that there are an increasing number of stakeholders to organisations who are demanding accountability – and forcing corporations to respond accordingly.
Social Responsibility Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 1, 2007
Keywords: Corporate governance; Ethics; Oil industry; Social responsibility
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.