Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to contrast consumer laws in England and Australia in relation to residential building projects, and considers how the laws of England may be improved in light of the Australian laws.Designmethodologyapproach The paper reviews consumer laws in both England and Australia, and examines the measures that are in place or not to protect consumers who engage builders or purchase a home that contains latent defects.Findings After comparing the laws of the two countries, the conclusion is made that English law could be improved by imposing regulations on builders, including by mandating the use of written contracts for building work which are required to contain particular terms, requiring builders to be licensed and insured, and by introducing a consumerfriendly form of dispute resolution for home building disputes.Practical implications The paper recommends that there be law reform in England.Originalityvalue The paper provides so far as the authors are aware the first comparison of English and Australian consumer laws in relation to residential building work.
International Journal of Law in the Built Environment – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 4, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.