Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Hirschman (1970)
Exit, Voice, and Loyalty
R. Brennan, M. McFadden, E. Law
Review of research: all that glitters is not gold: online delivery of education and training
D. Osborne, T. Gaebler (1992)
Reinventing Government: How the En-trepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector
J. Lyotard, G. Bennington, B. Massumi (1979)
The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge
D. Noble (1998)
Perspectives: Digital diploma mills: the automation of higher educationFirst Monday, 3
G. Salmon (2003)
E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online
C. Gordon
Governmental rationality: an introduction
J. O'Looney (1993)
Beyond Privatization and Service Integration: Organizational Models for Service DeliverySocial Service Review, 67
N. Rose (1999)
Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought
A. Morgan (1993)
Improving your students' learning : reflections on the experience of study
W. Bartlett (1993)
Quasi-markets and social policy
B. Hindess (1996)
Discourses of Power: From Hobbes to Foucault
B. Collis, J. Moonen (2002)
Flexible Learning in a Digital WorldOpen Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17
John Mitchell (2003)
E-Business and Online Learning: Connections and Opportunities for Vocational Education and Training.
J. Flint, R. Herbert, G. Leeves (2002)
Regional Small Business Perceptions of the Internet: The Case of Wyong ShireThe Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 8
R. Johnson
To wish and to will: reflections on policy formation and implementation in Australian distance education
M. Paulsen (2002)
Online Education Systems in Scandinavian and Australian Universities: A Comparative StudyThe International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3
D.F. Noble
Digital diploma mills: the automation of higher education
R. McClintock
The Educators Manifesto: Renewing the Progressive Bond with Posterity through the Social Construction of Digital Learning Communities
Katherine Nicoll (1998)
“Fixing” the “Facts”: flexible learning as policy inventionHigher Education Research & Development, 17
This paper discusses the managerialist approach to developing and implementing systems for flexible delivery of educational systems in the Australian university sector. Rapid advances in communication technologies have enabled the education sector to provide greater flexibility and diversity in the traditional areas of mixed delivery and distance education. Notes that educational policy is being shaped by neo‐liberal ideology, leading to systems of flexible delivery in which a concern with economic worth and efficiency can override the purpose of such systems. Asserts that, in order to develop effective online flexible learning systems, universities need to plan for, and invest heavily in, adequate programs to train academic staff in all aspects of the delivery of courses in the online flexible learning systems and to provide incentives to academics to become e‐moderators and managers of online flexible learning systems.
Campus-Wide Information Systems – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 1, 2004
Keywords: Distance learning; Universities; Higher education; Australia
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.