Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Chalmers Johnson (2006)
Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic
M. Hardt, A. Negri
Empire
R. Slaughter (2008)
Opinion: Is America “the land of the future”?Foresight, 10
T. Paine (1857)
Common SenseHall's Journal of Health, 4
Z. Sardar, Merryl Davies (2004)
American Dream, Global Nightmare
R. Haass
The age of nonpolarity: what will follow US dominance?
Tiziano Bonazzi, S. Lipset (1997)
American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged SwordThe American Historical Review, 102
John Winthrop (2008)
A Model of Christian Charity (1630)
R. Slaughter
Is America ‘the land of the future’?
M. Mann
Incoherent Empire
S. Huntington
The Clash of Civilisations and the Remaking of World Order
N. Ferguson, R. Bothwell (2005)
Colossus: The Price of America's EmpireInternational Journal, 60
H. Kitamura (1971)
BookThe emerging Japanese superstate: Challenge and response: by Herman Kahn 274 pages. $7.95. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJFutures, 3
A. Chua
Day of Empire: How Hyperpowers Rise to Global Dominance – and Why They Fail
A.J. Bacevich
American Empire: The Realities and Consequences of American Diplomacy
H. Kahn (1970)
The emerging Japanese superstate;: Challenge and response
S. Burman (2007)
The State of the American Empire: How the USA Shapes the World
T. Lynch, Robert Singh (2008)
After Bush: The Case for Continuity in American Foreign Policy
P. Katzenstein, R. Keohane
Anti‐Americanism in World Politics
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider the most likely future for the American empire. It is a speculative essay that takes as its starting‐point Slaughter's argument that the American Empire is unsustainable. Design/methodology/approach – The paper shows that at this moment of flux in international affairs America enjoys unprecedented power but is meeting growing opposition. After a review of how America came to be in its current position the argument develops along different lines, exploring the capacities of states that might challenge the USA and exploring the new networks between states and other agencies that exclude America. Findings – The paper finds that, while these networks have become increasingly dense, they are as yet insufficiently coherent to challenge US hegemony. If the USA adopts a less aggressive approach to the management of globalization it can build a new international architecture that will adorn its hegemony and avoid the new networks becoming a noose that will strangle its power. The US reaction to the new web of interstate and non‐governmental relationships that exclude it, and are motivated to some extent by a desire to challenge its authority, has the potential to determine the longevity of American power and the future path of international affairs. Originality/value – The paper provides a measured perspective to distinguish between the idea of America and the reality of its foreign policy.
foresight – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 18, 2008
Keywords: International relations; Globalization; United States of America
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.