Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Yanow
Built space as story: the policy stories that buildings tell
J. Vuorinen
Hyvinvointivaltion Avoin Muoto. Suomalaisen MassakorkeakoulujäRjestelmän Arkkitehtoninen Toteutus, Esimerkkinä Oulun Yliopiston Suunnittelu ja Varhaiset Rakennusvaiheet. (The Open form of the Welfare Society. The Architectural Implementation of the Finnish Mass University System: The Planning of University of Oulu and its Early Phases of Construction)
Kimberly Elsbach, M. Pratt (2007)
4 The Physical Environment in OrganizationsThe Academy of Management Annals, 1
K. Dale (2005)
Building a Social Materiality: Spatial and Embodied Politics in Organizational ControlOrganization, 12
S. Linstead, H. Höpfl (2000)
The Aesthetics of Organization
(1992)
Classical and Modern Interactions: Postmodern Architecture, Multiculturalism, Decline, and Other Issues
G. Cairns (2002)
Aesthetics, Morality and Power: Design as Espoused Freedom and Implicit ControlHuman Relations, 55
H. Mallgrave (2005)
Modern Architectural Theory: A Historical Survey, 1673-1968
B. Latour (1990)
Technology is Society Made DurableThe Sociological Review, 38
A. Marrewijk, D. Yanow (2010)
Organizational spaces : rematerializing the workaday world
K. Virta
Oulun yliopisto, I rakennusvaihe (“University of Oulu, building phase I”)
D.J.M. Voordt, H.B.R. Wegen
Architecture in Use: An Introduction to the Programming, Design and Evaluation of Buildings
Kjetil Fallan (2008)
Architecture in action: Traveling with actor-network theory in the land of architectural researchArchitectural Theory Review, 16
P. Gagliardi (1990)
Symbols and Artifacts: Views of the Corporate Landscape
M. Callon (1984)
Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc BayThe Sociological Review, 32
M. Kornberger, S. Clegg (2004)
Bringing Space Back in: Organizing the Generative BuildingOrganization Studies, 25
K. Virta
Oulun yliopiston esisuunnittelu (“Preliminary planning of the University of Oulu”)
D. Holt (1997)
Consumption and Identity at Work.Contemporary Sociology, 26
D. Yanow
Space stories: studying museum buildings as organizational spaces while reflecting on interpretive methods and their narration
M. Hatch (1987)
Physical Barriers, Task Characteristics, and Interaction Activity in Research and Development FirmsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 32
K. Virta
Oulun yliopiston sijainti ja perusratkaisu (“Location of the University of Oulu”)
K. Virta
Oulun yliopiston pääkirjasto, Oulu (“University of Oulu, main library”)
T. Hernes (2004)
The Spatial Construction of Organization
S. Clegg, M. Kornberger (2006)
Space, Organizations and Management Theory
D. Steadman
Biological Analogy in Architecture and the Applied Arts
S. Halford (2004)
‘Towards a Sociology of Organizational Space’Sociological Research Online, 9
Scott Taylor, A. Spicer (2007)
Time for Space: A Narrative Review of Research on Organizational SpacesWiley-Blackwell: International Journal of Management Reviews
P.O. Berg, K. Kreiner
Corporate architecture: turning physical settings into symbolic resources
A. Marrewijk (2009)
Corporate headquarters as physical embodiments of organisational changeJournal of Organizational Change Management, 22
K. Dale
Building a social materiality
K. Virta
Oulun Yliopisto: Linnanmaan Alueen Suunnittelu” (University of Oulu: Planning of the Linnamaa Area)
G. Oldham, Daniel Brass (1979)
Employee Reactions to an Open-Plan Office: A Naturally Occurring Quasi-Experiment.Administrative Science Quarterly, 24
D. Yanow (1995)
Built Space as StoryPolicy Studies Journal, 23
S. Kingma (2008)
Dutch casino space or the spatial organization of entertainmentCulture and Organization, 14
K. Virta
Oulun yliopisto, Linnanmaan alue (“University of Oulu, Linnanmaa campus area”)
Henri Lefebvre (1992)
The production of spaceEconomic Geography, 68
C. Watkins (2005)
Representations of Space, Spatial Practices and Spaces of Representation: An Application of Lefebvre’s Spatial TriadCulture and Organization, 11
G. Burrell, K. Dale (2003)
Building Better Worlds? Architecture and Critical Management Studies
T. Gieryn (2002)
What buildings doTheory and Society, 31
Reinhold Martin (2003)
The Organizational Complex: Architecture, Media, and Corporate Space
K. Elsbach, M. Pratt
The physical environment in organizations
H. Khan (1998)
International Style: Modernist Architecture from 1925 to 1965
D. Yanow (1993)
The communication of policy meanings: Implementation as interpretation and textPolicy Sciences, 26
D. Yanow (1998)
Space StoriesJournal of Management Inquiry, 7
M. Callon, J. Law (1995)
Agency and the Hybrid CollectifMathematics, Science, and Postclassical Theory
K. Dale, G. Burrell
Spaces of Organization and the Organization of Space
M. Guillén (1997)
Scientific Management's Lost Aesthetic: Architecture, Organization, and the Taylorized Beauty of the MechanicalAdministrative Science Quarterly, 42
J. Johnson (1988)
Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-CloserSocial Problems, 35
C. Jencks (1977)
The language of post-modern architecture
B. Hillier (1996)
Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture
J. Alexander, G. Morgan (1988)
Images of OrganizationAmerican Journal of Nursing, 88
W. Orlikowski, Susan Scott (2008)
10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and OrganizationThe Academy of Management Annals, 2
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report a study of architectural development and organizational meanings and uses of space in a Finnish university. Design/methodology/approach – The paper draws from actor‐network theory and Lefebvre's spatial‐social approach to shed light on the organizational assumptions of the various building phases and how current employees use and make sense of the architectural space in the case organization. The methods used include participant observation, interviews of employees and architects, and interpretation of planning documents, architectural statements and administrative representations of the complex. Findings – It took over 30 years to build the campus. The original plans for the university buildings were substantially revised as architectural and organizational paradigms changed over time. However, regardless of the more recently built state‐of‐the‐art facilities, the early architectural design ideas have persisted as material‐social forces that participate in the ongoing production and reproduction of organizational space. Originality/value – Despite of the recent surge of writings on organizational space and architecture, there are relatively few empirical studies done on the topic. In particular, analyses investigating the travel of design ideas from architectural planning to actual physical constructions and further to the everyday organizing practices of employees have so far been rare in organizational literature. This paper partially fills this gap.
Journal of Organizational Change Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 18, 2011
Keywords: Finland; Universities; Architecture; Space utilization; Organizational history; Users
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.