Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Ali, S. Rasoolimanesh, M. Sarstedt, C. Ringle, Ki-Sang Ryu (2017)
An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in Hospitality ResearchIndustrial & Manufacturing Engineering eJournal
Mie Augier, D. Teece (2007)
Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissionsManagement International Review, 47
M. Stone (1976)
Cross‐Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical PredictionsJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 36
K. Eisenhardt, Jeffrey Martin (2000)
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY?Strategic Management Journal, 21
(2020)
Mediation role of competitiveness in the relationship between knowledge acquisition and performance of international joint ventures
Business Statistics for Contemporary Decision Making
Organization Science, 13
A. Zolait, S. Sivadasan (2009)
Organizational Innovative Capabilities: An Empirical Study of Malaysian Firms
M. Plessis (2007)
The role of knowledge management in innovationJ. Knowl. Manag., 11
Kim Clark, Takahiro Fujimoto (2003)
Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know [Book Review]IEEE Engineering Management Review, 31
G.D.P. Growth (2018)
World Bank
Victor Oltra, Salvador Vivas-López, M. Peris-Ortiz (2018)
The role of ontological learning levels in developing dynamic capabilitiesInternational Journal of Learning and Change, 10
Prasanna Tambe, P. Cappelli, V. Yakubovich (2019)
Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management: Challenges and a Path ForwardCalifornia Management Review, 61
K. Conner, C. Prahalad (1996)
A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus OpportunismOrganization Science, 7
M. Sarstedt, Joseph Hair, J. Cheah, Jan-Michael Becker, C. Ringle (2019)
How to Specify, Estimate, and Validate Higher-Order Constructs in PLS-SEMAustralasian Marketing Journal, 27
Choice Reviews Online, 35
D. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen (1997)
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTStrategic Management Journal, 18
Royal Institute of Technology, 3
Strategic Management Review
Y. Yeh, Sun-Quae Lai, Chin-Tsang Ho (2006)
Knowledge management enablers: a case studyInd. Manag. Data Syst., 106
J. Rhodes, Richard Hung, P. Lok, Bella Lien, Chi-Min Wu (2008)
Factors influencing organizational knowledge transfer: implication for corporate performanceJ. Knowl. Manag., 12
R. Demir, S. Söderman (2007)
Skills and complexity in management of IJVs: Exploring Swedish managers’ experiences in ChinaInternational Business Review, 16
Encarnación García‐Sánchez, V. García-Morales, Rodrigo Martín-Rojas (2018)
Influence of Technological Assets on Organizational Performance through Absorptive Capacity, Organizational Innovation and Internal Labour FlexibilitySustainability, 10
D. Teece (2010)
Forward Integration and Innovation: Transaction Costs and BeyondJournal of Retailing, 86
Henri Inkinen (2016)
Review of empirical research on knowledge management practices and firm performanceJ. Knowl. Manag., 20
André Gold, A. Malhotra, A. Segars (2001)
Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities PerspectiveJournal of Management Information Systems, 18
R. Grant (1991)
The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy FormulationCalifornia Management Review, 33
D. Teece (2020)
Hand in Glove: Open Innovation and the Dynamic Capabilities FrameworkJournal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 1
W. Baker, James Sinkula (1999)
The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performanceJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27
Chansoo Park, I. Vertinsky, M. Becerra (2015)
Transfers of tacit vs explicit knowledge and performance in international joint ventures: the role of ageInternational Business Review, 24
Jan-Michael Becker, Kristina Klein, Martin Wetzels (2012)
Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type modelsLong Range Planning, 45
Vítor Costa, Samuel Monteiro (2016)
Knowledge Processes, Absorptive Capacity and Innovation: A Mediation AnalysisKnowledge and Process Management, 23
Maryam Alavi, Dorothy Leidner (2001)
Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research IssuesMIS Q., 25
Wei Zheng, Baiyin Yang, G. McLean (2010)
Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge managementJournal of Business Research, 63
P. Schoemaker, Sohvi Heaton, D. Teece (2018)
Innovation, Dynamic Capabilities, and LeadershipCalifornia Management Review, 61
M. Zollo, S. Winter (2002)
Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic CapabilitiesOrganization Science, 13
Michael Tippins, R. Sohi (2003)
IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link?Strategic Management Journal, 24
D. Levin, Rob Cross (2004)
The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge TransferManag. Sci., 50
Heeseok Lee, Byounggu Choi (2003)
Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical ExaminationJournal of Management Information Systems, 20
Asif Islam, S. Muzi, Jorge Meza (2016)
Does mobile money use increase firms’ investment? Evidence from Enterprise Surveys in Kenya, Uganda, and TanzaniaSmall Business Economics, 51
E. Claver-Cortés, P. Zaragoza-Sáez, Eva Pertusa-Ortega (2007)
Organizational structure features supporting knowledge management processesJ. Knowl. Manag., 11
Bernard Simonin (2004)
An Empirical Investigation of the Process of Knowledge Transfer in International Strategic AlliancesJournal of International Business Studies, 35
Hyo-Min Seo, Min Kim, Kyungro Chang, Taehee Kim (2016)
Influence Of Interpersonal Trust On Innovative Behaviour Of Service Workers: Mediating Effects Of Knowledge SharingInternational Journal of Innovation Management, 20
Zhining Wang, Nianxin Wang (2012)
Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performanceExpert Syst. Appl., 39
M. Lemon, Parminder Sahota (2004)
Organizational culture as a knowledge repository for increased innovative capacityTechnovation, 24
N. Anand (2014)
An Overview of Indian Economy (1991-2013)IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 3
L. Ali, Yousif Al-Hakim, S. Hassan (2011)
The role of middle managers in knowledge management implementation for innovation enhancement
Joseph Hair, Matt Howard, Christian Nitzl (2020)
Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysisJournal of Business Research, 109
Olga Petricevic, D. Teece (2019)
The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterpriseJournal of International Business Studies, 50
(2013)
Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS
Lei Chang (1994)
A Psychometric Evaluation of 4-Point and 6-Point Likert-Type Scales in Relation to Reliability and ValidityApplied Psychological Measurement, 18
Tarun Kabiraj, C. Lee, S. Marjit (2005)
Cultural Compatibility and Joint Venture Instability: A Theoretical AnalysisIndian economic review, 40
(2019)
India ranks in ‘Bloomberg Innovation Index’ of 60 economies for first time ever
B. Lawson, D. Samson (2001)
DEVELOPING INNOVATION CAPABILITY IN ORGANISATIONS: A DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES APPROACHInternational Journal of Innovation Management, 05
D. Teece (2018)
Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theoryJournal of Management & Organization, 24
D. Teece (2010)
Business Models, Business Strategy and InnovationLong Range Planning, 43
V. Aggarwal, Madhavi Kapoor (2018)
Innovation growth from knowledge transfer in international strategic alliancesJournal of Strategy and Management
J. Barney (1991)
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive AdvantageJournal of Management, 17
D. Teece (1992)
Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological ProgressJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18
P. Buckley (2002)
Is the International Business Research Agenda Running Out of Steam?Journal of International Business Studies, 33
Oliver Schilke, Songcui Hu, Constance Helfat (2018)
Quo Vadis, Dynamic Capabilities? A Content-Analytic Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Recommendations for Future ResearchThe Academy of Management Annals, 12
J. Darroch (2005)
Knowledge management, innovation and firm performanceJ. Knowl. Manag., 9
Ramani Gade, M. Tulasi, V. Bhai
SEAWEEDS : A NOVEL BIOMATERIAL
Joseph Hair, Jeffrey Risher, M. Sarstedt, C. Ringle (2019)
When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEMEuropean Business Review
P. Braunerhjelm, Ding Ding, Per Thulin (2018)
The knowledge spillover theory of intrapreneurshipSmall Business Economics, 51
M. Sarstedt, C. Ringle, J. Cheah, H. Ting, O. Moisescu, Lăcrămioara Radomir (2020)
Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEMTourism Economics, 26
(2020)
Ceic data
Anna Rylander, J. Peppard (2005)
What Really is a Knowledge-Intensive Firm? (Re)framing Research in the “Knowledge Economy"
The study purports at investigating the effect of organizational factors (strategy, culture, information technology and structure) on knowledge transfer and innovation performance in the context of Indian International joint ventures (IJVs) of varied ages and industries. All the variables are woven together in the framework of dynamic capabilities theory.Design/methodology/approachPLS-SEM was used to analyze the primary data collected from IJVs. The disjoint two-stage approach was applied to check the mediation in the model. The multigroup technique was deployed to test group-differences in the sample.FindingsThe four organizational factors, combined as a construct, are seen to have a positive impact on knowledge transfer, which facilitates innovation performance. But mediation analysis revealed the insignificant indirect relationship of organizational factors with innovation through knowledge transfer for the total sample. In-depth group analysis revealed that these results differ between young and mature IJVs and knowledge-intensive and non-knowledge intensive industries.Research limitations/implicationsThe number of organizational factors is limited to four, which can be further increased. Longitudinal studies for investigating the formation of dynamic capabilities can be the future research direction.Originality/valueThe research has provided hierarchical analysis for organizational factors, knowledge transfer and innovation performance with multigroup industrial and age-wise analysis of Indian IJVs, which is still unplumbed in international business literature.
South Asian Journal of Business Studies – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 3, 2021
Keywords: Dynamic capabilities; Knowledge transfer; Smart-PLS-3; Sustainable competitive advantage; Innovation performance; International joint ventures/global ventures; MGA
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.