Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Thangaratinam, Charles Redman (2005)
The Delphi techniqueThe Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 7
Hazel Easthope, J. Warnken, Cathy Sherry, E. Coiacetto, Dianne Dredge, C. Guilding, N. Johnston, D. Lamminmaki, Sacha Reid (2014)
How Property Title Impacts Urban Consolidation: A Life Cycle Examination of Multi-title DevelopmentsUrban Policy and Research, 32
Ruth Aguilera, Alvaro Cuervo‐Cazurra (2009)
Codes of Good GovernanceIO: Firm Structure
Shorey Peterson, A. Berle, G. Means (1933)
The Modern Corporation and Private Property.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 28
N. Yip, R. Forrest (2002)
Property Owning Democracies? Home Owner Corporations in Hong KongHousing Studies, 17
Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny (1996)
A Survey of Corporate GovernanceOrganizations & Markets eJournal
Hazel Easthope (2009)
The fourth tier of governance: Managing the future of our cities
Martti Lujanen (2010)
Legal challenges in ensuring regular maintenance and repairs of owner‐occupied apartment blocksInternational Journal of Law in The Built Environment, 2
S. Letza, J. Kirkbride, Xiuping Sun (2004)
Shareholding Versus Stakeholding: A Critical Review of Corporate GovernanceCorporate Finance: Governance
Kaylene Arkcoll, C. Guilding, Dawne Lamminamki, L. McManus, J. Warnken (2013)
Funding common property expenditure in multi‐owned housing schemesProperty Management, 31
S. Blandy, J. Dixon, A. Dupuis (2006)
Theorising Power Relationships in Multi-owned Residential Developments: Unpacking the Bundle of RightsUrban Studies, 43
N. Johnston, Sacha Reid (2013)
Multi-owned developments: a life cycle review of a developing research areaProperty Management, 31
O. Klakegg, T. Williams, Ole Magnussen, Helene Glasspool (2009)
Governance Frameworks for Public Project Development and EstimationProject Management Journal, 39
S. Keeney, F. Hasson, H. McKenna (2001)
A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing.International journal of nursing studies, 38 2
Douglas Branson (2006)
Too Many Bells? Too Many Whistles? Corporate Governance in the Post Enron, Post Worldcom EraCorporate Law: Corporate & Financial Law: Interdisciplinary Approaches eJournal
N. Johnston, C. Guilding, Sacha Reid (2012)
Examining Developer Actions that Embed Protracted Conflict and Dysfunctionality in Staged Multi-owned Residential Schemes
Lisa Ruhanen, N. Scott, B. Ritchie, Aaron Tkaczynski (2010)
Governance: a review and synthesis of the literatureTourism Review, 65
Roger Miller, D. Lessard (2001)
The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects: Shaping Institutions, Risks, and Governance
Hazel Easthope, Bill Randolph (2009)
Governing the Compact City: The Challenges of Apartment Living in Sydney, AustraliaHousing Studies, 24
Bill Randolph (2006)
Delivering the Compact City in Australia: Current Trends and Future ImplicationsUrban Policy and Research, 24
Cathy Sherry (2009)
The New South Wales Strata and Community Titles Acts: A Case Study of Legislatively Created High Rise and Master Planned CommunitiesInternational Journal of Law in The Built Environment, 1
G. Rowe, George Wright (1999)
The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysisInternational Journal of Forecasting, 15
Eric Too, P. Weaver (2014)
The management of project management: a conceptual framework for project governanceInternational Journal of Project Management, 32
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to develop a governance typology which identifies governance issues and outcomes. Multi-owned properties (MOPs) are a unique property type due to the incorporation of a private governance association. Although there are jurisdictional differences, these associations are generally responsible for the management, maintenance and control of the commonly owned property; determining the contributions payable by each lot owner to the operation of the association; enforcing the rules of the association; and ensuring that records meet legislative requirements. Legislation for MOP schemes was enacted in different jurisdictions to guide the governance and management of these matters. However, challenges relating to the governance of MOPs have continued to be a problem as identified in the literature and practice. Design/methodology/approach – The study first reviewed the legislation in three Australian states to identify specific governance categories and the legislative requirements related to those categories. To gain group opinion about the specific governance issues and outcomes, the Delphi method was utilised whereby industry experts participated in a two-round survey questionnaire. Findings – A typology was developed as a result of consensus found between participants. The findings identified key governance issues and outcomes for MOPs. Practical implications – The governance typology forms the basis for the development of a more comprehensive audit tool for the assessment of governance quality in individual schemes. Originality/value – This paper is the first of its kind to collate issues impacting upon effective owners’ corporation governance and the potential outcomes associated with poor governance practices in MOPs.
International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 5, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.