Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S.H Tsaur, G.H Tzeng, G.C Wang
The application of AHP and fuzzy MCDM on the evaluation study of tourist risk
D. Mileti (1999)
Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States
M. Patyra (1997)
Book review: Fuzzy logic and Neuro Fuzzy Applications Explained by Constantin von Altrock (Prentice Hall 1995)SIGART Bull., 8
M. Zeleny
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
C. Altrock (1995)
Fuzzy logic and neurofuzzy applications explained
L. Duckstein, S. Opricovic (1980)
Multiobjective optimization in river basin developmentWater Resources Research, 16
Chitrasen Samantra (2012)
Decision-making in fuzzy environment
S Opricovic
Multi‐criteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems
Shu-Jen Chen, C. Hwang (1992)
Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications, 375
Tsaur Sheng-Hshiung, Tzeng Gwo-Hshiung, Wang Kuo-ching (1997)
Evaluating tourist risks from fuzzy perspectivesAnnals of Tourism Research, 24
F Kozin, H.K Zhou
Systems study of urban response and reconstruction due to catastrophic earthquakes
Junn-Yuan Teng, G. Tzeng (1996)
FUZZY MULTICRITERIA RANKING OF URBAN TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT ALTERNATIVES.Transportation Planning and Technology, 20
Rita Ribeiro (1996)
Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: A review and new preference elicitation techniquesFuzzy Sets Syst., 78
M. Horikiri, M Odani
Analysis of residents’ evacuation behavior after the Great Hanshin‐Awaji earthquake in Japan
A multi-criteria model is developed for analyzing the land-use strategies for reducing the future social and economic costs in an area with potential natural hazard. A multi-criteria decision-making procedure consists of generating alternatives, establishing criteria, assessment of criteria weights and application of the compromise ranking method (VIKOR). The alternatives are the scenarios of sustainable hazard effects mitigation, generated in the form of comprehensive land-use plans. The alternative plans should consider the redevelopment of urban areas and infrastructures, multi-purpose land use, including restrictions on building in hazardous areas. The evaluation of alternatives is implicated with imprecision (or uncertainty) of established criteria, and the fuzzy multi-criteria model is developed to deal with "qualitative" (unquantifiable or linguistic) or incomplete information. The planning goal is to compromise competitive land uses through choice of the best (compromise) combination of uses. An application of this model is illustrated with the post-earthquake regional planning problem in central Taiwan.
Environmental Management and Health – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 1, 2002
Keywords: Modelling; Disasters
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.