Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Adair, N. Hutchison, J. Burgess, Stephen Roulac (2005)
The appraisal of urban regeneration landJournal of Property Investment & Finance, 23
E. Atherton, N. French, L. Gabrielli (2005)
Decision Theory and Real Estate Development: A Note on UncertaintyReal Estate eJournal
D. Bell, H. Raiffa, A. Tversky (1988)
Decision Making: DESCRIPTIVE, NORMATIVE, AND PRESCRIPTIVE INTERACTIONS IN DECISION MAKING
P. Loizou, N. French (2012)
Risk and uncertainty in development: A critical evaluation of using the Monte Carlo simulation method as a decision tool in real estate development projectsJournal of Property Investment & Finance, 30
D. Bell, H. Raiffa, A. Tversky (1990)
Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions.
M. Smolka, Camila Maleronka (2018)
Assessing the monetary relevance of land value capture: the case for charges for additional building rights in São Paulo, Brazil, 1
(2005)
Land value and large urban projects: the Latin American experience
Journal of European Real Estate Research, 1
The purpose of this paper is to explore how Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) could have enhanced understanding of the risks involved in the financial strategy for revitalization of Rio de Janeiro’s central city based on the capture of value generated by government interventions.Design/methodology/approachThe study first describes the process involved in developing the financial strategy and model without MCS. Then, it shows how the MCS could have been integrated into this process and evaluates its potential impacts on the quality of risk analysis.FindingsIf MCS is fully integrated into the decision-making process, it can serve as a heuristic tool that helps team members to better understand risks by generating forecasts of land value and other variables as a probability distributions. By showing the variance of the forecasted variable, MCS integrates elements of modern risk analysis into financial model development in a cost-effective manner.Research limitations/implicationsMCS covers only the risks associated with the variables in the financial model. Events that seem extremely unlikely (i.e. “black swans”) can occur and must be assessed separately.Practical implicationsMCS can help analysts to understand the financial risks of large-scale development projects involving value capture, even in the prefeasibility stage.Social implicationsBy facilitating value capture, MCS could help close the financing gap for sustainable urban development and subsidies for lower income families.Originality/valueThe study “retrofits” MCS on a successfully completed financial prefeasibility study to assess its usefulness as a heuristic tool.
Journal of Property Investment & Finance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 10, 2019
Keywords: Monte Carlo simulation; Financial model; Risk assessment; Urban development; Land value capture; Scenario analysis; Rio de Janeiro; Brazil
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.