Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Allen Bluedorn, R. Kanter (1978)
Men and Women of the CorporationBritish Journal of Sociology, 31
R. House, R. Aditya (1997)
The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis?Journal of Management, 23
H. Trice, J. Beyer (1991)
Cultural Leadership in OrganizationsOrganization Science, 2
W. Gardner, B. Avolio (1998)
The Charismatic Relationship: A Dramaturgical PerspectiveAcademy of Management Review, 23
S. Fiske (1980)
Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38
E.C. Baig
Gates looks into PC's future as career shift approaches
L.Z. McArthur, E. Ginsberg
Causal attribution to salient stimuli: an investigation of visual fixation mediators
S. Barnet, H. Bedau (1987)
Current Issues and Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument with Readings
J.T. Tedeschi, N. Norman
Social power, self‐presentation, and the self
Troy Mumford, M. Campion, F. Morgeson (2007)
The leadership skills strataplex: Leadership skill requirements across organizational levelsLeadership Quarterly, 18
A. Bandura (1977)
Social learning theoryCanadian Journal of Sociology-cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie, 2
J. Conger, R. Kanungo (1988)
Charismatic Leadership: The Elusive Factor in Organizational Effectiveness
M. Kravcík, Andreas Kaibel, M. Specht, Lucia Terrenghi (2004)
Mobile Collector for Field TripsJ. Educ. Technol. Soc., 7
L. McArthur, E. Ginsberg (1981)
Causal Attribution to Salient StimuliPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7
T. Gill (2007)
Using the Tablet PC for InstructionDecision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5
J.W. Rogers, J.R. Cox
Integrating a single TabletPC in chemistry, engineering, and physics courses
L. McArthur, D. Post (1977)
Figural emphasis and person perception.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13
L. Fiering, T. Kort, J. Shao, G. Shiffler, K. Dulaney
TabletPC market continues slow but steady shipment growth
B. Bass (1988)
Evolving perspectives on charismatic leadership.
Richard Anderson, Ruth Anderson, Peter Davis, Natalie Linnell, Craig Prince, Valentin Razmov, F. Videon (2007)
Classroom Presenter: Enhancing Interactive Education with Digital InkComputer, 40
E.T. Higgins, G.A. King
Accessibility of social constructs: information‐processing consequences of individual and contextual variability
S. Machin, S. Mcnally, Olmo Silva (2006)
New Technology in Schools: Is There a Payoff?Labor: Human Capital
K. Mock
Teaching with TabletPCs
M. Glacken, D. Chaney (2004)
Perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing research findings in the Irish practice setting.Journal of clinical nursing, 13 6
A. Bandura (1985)
Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory
Michael Agnes, D. Guralnik (1997)
Webster's New World college dictionary
A. Bandura (1997)
Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of ControlJournal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 13
B. Shamir, R. House, M. Arthur (1993)
The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based TheoryOrganization Science, 4
A. Bandura (2001)
Social Cognitive Theory of Mass CommunicationMedia Psychology, 3
Y. Appleby, A. Bathmaker (2006)
The new skills agenda : increased lifelong learning or new sites of inequality?British Educational Research Journal, 32
Ma Gaston (2005)
Become a Critical ReaderAmerican Dental Hygienists Association, 79
J. Conger, R. Kanungo (1987)
Toward a Behavioral Theory of Charismatic Leadership in Organizational SettingsAcademy of Management Review, 12
S.T. Fiske, S.E. Taylor
Social Cognition
J. Shao
Report highlight for dataquest insight: TabletPCs are slowly gaining momentum
Purpose – Leaders model behaviors they want followers to emulate, and they use various technologies to enhance their message, but which tools are most effective? Using two studies, this paper sets out to compare the effectiveness of newer and older computer technologies used by leaders for describing and demonstrating desired behaviors. Design/methodology/approach – The first study, an interdisciplinary experimental design, involved 110 students across two college campuses and data were analyzed using a 2 (modeling and no modeling)×2 (older and newer technology) between‐subjects ANOVA. The second study further explored modeling with both technologies on one campus, and data were analyzed with independent samples t ‐tests. Findings – Newer technology was more effective than older technology in increasing desired behaviors but only when coupled with modeling of those behaviors by the leader. However, after the novelty of the new technology had worn off, no significant difference in production of desired behaviors was observed. Practical implications – Justifying the expense of purchasing new technology to replace functional older equipment is an important consideration for businesses and universities. Organizational leaders need factual, unbiased data to guide their decisions about allocating limited financial resources. Originality/value – The studies were designed to provide decision‐makers with some much‐needed empirical data.
Leadership & Organization Development Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 6, 2009
Keywords: Leadership; Communication technologies; Modelling
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.