Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Mergers and acquisitions in the insurance sector: reducing information asymmetry

Mergers and acquisitions in the insurance sector: reducing information asymmetry Purpose – According to several authors 50 per cent of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) operations destroy value. The aim of this paper is to study the reasons why it happens and to seek to reveal that intangible assets, which are increasingly important in today's economy, must be better assessed during the due diligence phase. Design/methodology/approach – The authors present a part of the French intangible assets measurement approach, which has been published by the French Intangible Assets Observatory. The methodology proposes an extended balance sheet which is an interesting addition to the IAS‐IFRS intangible standard. It identifies 12 classes of intangible assets including human capital and customer capital. Findings – The paper proposes a due diligence approach, using the French methodology and applies it to the insurance sector. Research limitations/implications – This paper is not an academic paper. However, a significant research program is now underway in France. Academic publications are expected to be submitted. Practical implications – The practice of intangible due diligence is a key issue in today's increasingly intangible economy. This practice is on the verge of a very strong development. Originality/value – The paper presents a systemic approach to intangible assets. It answers a key question: what are the main assets that are necessary to start and continue a process of value creation? Accounting only recognizes the intangible assets that are not overly volatile, for prudential reasons. But even if customers or teams are “too intangible” for accountants, they are required to generate cash flows. If they are not evaluated, the process of wealth creation is not under control. This is crucial in M&A. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Intellectual Capital Emerald Publishing

Mergers and acquisitions in the insurance sector: reducing information asymmetry

Alan Fustec; Tanguy Faroult
Journal of Intellectual Capital , Volume 12 (4): 10 – Oct 25, 2011
Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/mergers-and-acquisitions-in-the-insurance-sector-reducing-information-3sXXhUZMV7
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1469-1930
DOI
10.1108/14691931111181698
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – According to several authors 50 per cent of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) operations destroy value. The aim of this paper is to study the reasons why it happens and to seek to reveal that intangible assets, which are increasingly important in today's economy, must be better assessed during the due diligence phase. Design/methodology/approach – The authors present a part of the French intangible assets measurement approach, which has been published by the French Intangible Assets Observatory. The methodology proposes an extended balance sheet which is an interesting addition to the IAS‐IFRS intangible standard. It identifies 12 classes of intangible assets including human capital and customer capital. Findings – The paper proposes a due diligence approach, using the French methodology and applies it to the insurance sector. Research limitations/implications – This paper is not an academic paper. However, a significant research program is now underway in France. Academic publications are expected to be submitted. Practical implications – The practice of intangible due diligence is a key issue in today's increasingly intangible economy. This practice is on the verge of a very strong development. Originality/value – The paper presents a systemic approach to intangible assets. It answers a key question: what are the main assets that are necessary to start and continue a process of value creation? Accounting only recognizes the intangible assets that are not overly volatile, for prudential reasons. But even if customers or teams are “too intangible” for accountants, they are required to generate cash flows. If they are not evaluated, the process of wealth creation is not under control. This is crucial in M&A.

Journal

Journal of Intellectual Capital – Emerald Publishing

Published: Oct 25, 2011

Keywords: Intangible assets; Intellectual capital; Acquisitions and mergers; France

References

  • Intellectual Assets and Value Creation: Implication for Coporate Reporting
    Bismuth, A.; Kirkpatrick, G.
  • Croissance externe et création de valeur
    Chaigneau, A.
  • Intellectual Capital
    Edvinsson, L.; Malone, M.S.
  • Where Is the Wealth of Nations? Measuring Capital for the XXI Century
    Hamilton, K.
  • The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action
    Kaplan, R.S.; Norton, D.P.
  • Communication at the 2nd National Day of Intangible Assets
    Rousseau, L.
  • New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge‐based Assets
    Sveiby, K.E.