Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Memoir and the diagnosis of schizophrenia: reflections on The Centre Cannot Hold , Me, Myself, and Them , and the “crumbling twin pillars” of Kraepelinian psychiatry

Memoir and the diagnosis of schizophrenia: reflections on The Centre Cannot Hold , Me, Myself,... Purpose – Over 100 years ago, Emil Kraepelin revolutionised the classification of psychosis by identifying what he argued were two natural disease entities: manic depressive psychosis (bipolar disorder) and dementia praecox (schizophrenia). Kraepelin's discoveries have since become the “twin pillars” of mainstream psychiatric thinking, practice, and research. Today, however, a growing number of researchers, clinicians, and mental health service users have rejected this model and call for a symptom‐led approach to prioritise subjective experience over diagnostic category. The purpose of this paper is to ask: how can the published first‐person accounts of experts by experience contribute to these debates? Design/methodology/approach – This paper analyses the representation of psychiatric diagnosis in two prominent autobiographies: Kurt Snyder's Me, Myself, and Them: A Firsthand Account of One Young Person's Experience with Schizophrenia (2007) and Elyn Saks' The Center Cannot Hold: My Journey Through Madness (2007). Findings – As well as providing a prognosis and a plan for treatment, the psychiatric diagnosis of schizophrenia gives shape and meaning to the illness experience and ultimately becomes the pivot or platform from which identity and memoir unfold. Practical implications – The paper introduces two popular autobiographical accounts of schizophrenia which may be useful resources for mental health service users and clinicians. Social implications – The paper highlights the complex ways in which people interpret and make meaning from their psychiatric diagnosis. Originality/value – The paper demonstrates that first‐person accounts make an important, if frequently overlooked, contribution to debates about psychiatric diagnosis. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Mental Health Review Journal Emerald Publishing

Memoir and the diagnosis of schizophrenia: reflections on The Centre Cannot Hold , Me, Myself, and Them , and the “crumbling twin pillars” of Kraepelinian psychiatry

Angela Woods
Mental Health Review Journal , Volume 16 (3): 5 – Sep 16, 2011
Download PDF
5 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/memoir-and-the-diagnosis-of-schizophrenia-reflections-on-the-centre-h2eXczmdWt
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1361-9322
DOI
10.1108/13619321111178041
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – Over 100 years ago, Emil Kraepelin revolutionised the classification of psychosis by identifying what he argued were two natural disease entities: manic depressive psychosis (bipolar disorder) and dementia praecox (schizophrenia). Kraepelin's discoveries have since become the “twin pillars” of mainstream psychiatric thinking, practice, and research. Today, however, a growing number of researchers, clinicians, and mental health service users have rejected this model and call for a symptom‐led approach to prioritise subjective experience over diagnostic category. The purpose of this paper is to ask: how can the published first‐person accounts of experts by experience contribute to these debates? Design/methodology/approach – This paper analyses the representation of psychiatric diagnosis in two prominent autobiographies: Kurt Snyder's Me, Myself, and Them: A Firsthand Account of One Young Person's Experience with Schizophrenia (2007) and Elyn Saks' The Center Cannot Hold: My Journey Through Madness (2007). Findings – As well as providing a prognosis and a plan for treatment, the psychiatric diagnosis of schizophrenia gives shape and meaning to the illness experience and ultimately becomes the pivot or platform from which identity and memoir unfold. Practical implications – The paper introduces two popular autobiographical accounts of schizophrenia which may be useful resources for mental health service users and clinicians. Social implications – The paper highlights the complex ways in which people interpret and make meaning from their psychiatric diagnosis. Originality/value – The paper demonstrates that first‐person accounts make an important, if frequently overlooked, contribution to debates about psychiatric diagnosis.

Journal

Mental Health Review Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Sep 16, 2011

Keywords: Schizophrenia; Bipolar disorder; Memoir; Medical diagnosis; First‐person perspective; Psychiatry

References

  • Psychiatry's civil war
    Aldhous, P.
  • Deconstructing psychosis conference February 2006: the validity of schizophrenia and alternative approaches to the classification of psychosis
    Allardyce, J.; Gaebel, W.; Zielasek, J.; Van Os, J,.
  • Madness Explained: Psychosis and Human Nature
    Bentall, R.P.
  • Doctoring the Mind: Is Our Current Treatment of Mental Illness Really Any Good?
    Bentall, R.P.
  • Schizophrenia – A Scientific Delusion?
    Boyle, M.
  • Taxonomy and ontology in psychiatry: a survey of recent literature
    Broome, M.R.
  • Data and clinical utility should be the drivers of changes to psychiatric classification
    Craddock, N.; Owen, M.J.
  • The Kraepelinian dichotomy – going, going … but still not gone
    Craddock, N.; Owen, M.J.
  • Opening Pandoras box: the 19 worst suggestions for DSM5
    Frances, A.
  • Should our major classifications of mental disorders be revised?
    Goldberg, D.
  • The Kraepelinian dichotomy: the twin pillars crumbling?
    Greene, T.
  • Making progress in schizophrenia research
    Heckers, S.
  • Disorders of thought are severe mood disorders: the selective attention defect in mania challenges the Kraepelinian dichotomy – a review
    Lake, C.R.
  • Hypothesis: Grandiosity and guilt cause paranoia; paranoid schizophrenia is a psychotic mood disorder – a review
    Lake, C.R.
  • Schizoaffective disorders are psychotic mood disorders; there are no schizoaffective disorders
    Lake, C.R.; Hurwitz, N.
  • Is ‘bipolar disorder’ the brain's autopoietic response to schizophrenia?
    Llewellyn, S.
  • The genetic deconstruction of psychosis
    Owen, M.J.; Craddock, N.; Jablensky, A.
  • The harmful concept of schizophrenia
    Romme, M.; Morris, M.
  • The Center Cannot Hold: My Journey Through Madness
    Saks, E.
  • Me, Myself, and Them: A Firsthand Account of One Young Person's Experience with Schizophrenia
    Snyder, K.; Gur, R.E.; Andrews, L.W.