Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/mediator-insight-disputants-perceptions-of-third-parties-knowledge-and-AbCehkgALj
References (49)
-
Marieke Kleiboer (1996)
Understanding Success and Failure of International MediationJournal of Conflict Resolution, 40
-
J. Cooper, R. Croyle (1984)
Attitudes and attitude change.Annual review of psychology, 35
-
10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.776
-
I. Zartman, Saadia Touval (1985)
International Mediation: Conflict Resolution and Power PoliticsJournal of Social Issues, 41
-
A. Elangovan (1995)
Managerial Third-Party Dispute Intervention: A Prescriptive Model of Strategy SelectionAcademy of Management Review, 20
-
D. Lax, James Sebenius (1987)
The Manager as Negotiator -
E. McGinnies, C. Ward (1980)
Better Liked than RightPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6
-
C. Hovland, I. Janis, H. Kelley (1953)
Communication And Persuasion -
G. Welton, D. Pruitt (1987)
The Mediation ProcessPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13
-
Jacob Bercovitch (1992)
Mediators and mediation strategies in international relationsNegotiation Journal, 8
-
R. Baron, D. Kenny (1986)
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 51 6
-
Rekha Karambayya, J. Brett (1989)
Managers Handling Disputes: Third-Party Roles and Perceptions of FairnessAcademy of Management Journal, 32
-
Donald Conlon, P. Carnevale, William Ross (1994)
The Influence of Third Party Power and Suggestions on Negotiation: The Surface Value of a Compromise1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24
-
T. Kochan, T. Jick (1978)
The Public Sector Mediation ProcessJournal of Conflict Resolution, 22
-
R. Kandel (1998)
Situated substantive expertise: An ethnographic illustration and a proposed standard of practice for mediatorsConflict Resolution Quarterly, 15
-
10.1111/j.1571-9979.1991.tb00599.x
-
10.1111/j.1571-9979.1996.tb00079.x
-
10.1111/j.1571-9979.1985.tb00328.x
-
R. Folger, M. Konovsky (1989)
Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise DecisionsAcademy of Management Journal, 32
-
D. Brookmire, F. Sistrunk (1980)
The Effects of Perceived Ability and Impartiality of Mediators and Time Pressure on NegotiationJournal of Conflict Resolution, 24
-
D. O’Keefe (1990)
Persuasion: Theory and Research -
10.2307/256381
-
10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.460
-
K. Jehn (1995)
A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup ConflictAdministrative Science Quarterly, 40
-
Jerry Wittmer, P. Carnevale, M. Walker (1991)
General Alignment and Overt Support in Biased MediationJournal of Conflict Resolution, 35
-
S. Chaiken, Durairaj Maheswaran (1994)
Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment.Journal of personality and social psychology, 66 3
-
10.1111/j.1571-9979.1995.tb00051.x
-
P. Carnevale, D. Pruitt (1992)
NEGOTIATION AND MEDIATIONAnnual Review of Psychology, 43
-
K. Gibson, Leigh Thompson, M. Bazerman (1996)
Shortcomings of neutrality in mediation: Solutions based on rationalityNegotiation Journal, 12
-
Jacob Bercovitch (1996)
Understanding mediation's role in preventive diplomacyNegotiation Journal, 12
-
Jacob Bercovitch (1991)
International mediation and dispute settlement: Evaluating the conditions for successful mediationNegotiation Journal, 7
-
Allen Amason (1996)
Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management TeamsAcademy of Management Journal, 39
-
Josh Arnold, K. O'Connor (1999)
Ombudspersons or Peers? The effect of third-party expertise and recommendations on negotiationJournal of Applied Psychology, 84
-
Donald Conlon, William Ross (1993)
The effects of partisan third parties on negotiator behavior and outcome perceptionsJournal of Applied Psychology, 78
-
Josh Arnold, P. Carnevale (1997)
Preferences for Dispute Resolution Procedures as a Function of Intentionality, Consequences, Expected Future Interaction, and Power1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27
-
P. Carnevale, Richard Pegnetter (1985)
The Selection of Mediation Tactics in Public Sector Disputes: A Contingency AnalysisJournal of Social Issues, 41
-
D. Kolb (1985)
To Be a Mediator: Expressive Tactics in MediationJournal of Social Issues, 41
-
10.1111/j.1571-9979.1992.tb00671.x
-
M. Kutner (1975)
Applied Linear Statistical Models -
S. Saxton, E. Locke (1987)
Generalizing From Laboratory to Field Settings.Contemporary Sociology, 16
-
10.1111/j.1571-9979.1996.tb00099.x
-
D. Kolb, Blair Sheppard (1985)
Do managers mediate, or even arbitrate?Negotiation Journal, 1
-
H. Gadlin, Elizabeth Pino (1997)
Neutrality: A Guide for the Organizational OmbudspersonNegotiation Journal, 13
-
M. Birnbaum, Steven Stegner (1979)
Source Credibility in Social Judgment: Bias, Expertise, and the Judge's Point of ViewJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37
-
O’Connor (1997)
Groups and Solos in Context: The Effects of Accountability on Team Negotiation.Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 72 3
-
J. Brett, S. Goldberg, William Ury (1990)
Designing systems for resolving disputes in organizations.American Psychologist, 45
-
J. Brett, Z. Barsness, S. Goldberg (1996)
The effectiveness of mediation: An independent analysis of cases handled by four major service providersNegotiation Journal, 12
-
I. Weschler (1950)
The Personal Factor in Labor MediationPersonnel Psychology, 3
-
James Holzworth (1983)
Intervention in a cognitive conflictOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
- ISSN
- 1044-4068
- DOI
- 10.1108/eb022844
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This study examined the influence of mediator insight on disputants' perceptions and behaviors in negotiation. Participants played the role of student employee representatives and bargained with student management representatives over a number of issues. During the course of the negotiation, a mediator made recommendations as to how the conflict should be resolved. The experiment varied 1 the amount of information disputants believed mediators possessed about their interests and needs and 2 mediator recommendations e.g., integrative, compromise, non integrative. The results indicated that perceived insight i.e., the level of information about the conflict had strong effects on disputants' perceptions of mediator credibility. Perceptions of mediator credibility, in turn, were found to influence disputants' general perceptions of the mediator e.g., acceptability, confidence, satisfaction and perceptions of the mediator's recommendations.
Journal
International Journal of Conflict Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 2000