Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Cole, P. Kernan (1996)
Life-cycle energy use in office buildingsBuilding and Environment, 31
G. Verbeeck, H. Hens (2010)
Life cycle inventory of buildings: A calculation methodBuilding and Environment, 45
D. Ürge-Vorsatz, L. Harvey, S. Mirasgedis, M. Levine (2007)
Mitigating CO2 emissions from energy use in the world's buildingsBuilding Research & Information, 35
Wacław. Szarejko, E. Trocka-Leszczyńska (2007)
Aspect of functionality in modernization of office buildingsFacilities, 25
C. Thormark (2002)
A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potentialBuilding and Environment, 37
A. Stephan, R. Crawford, Kristel Myttenaere (2012)
Towards a comprehensive life cycle energy analysis framework for residential buildingsEnergy and Buildings, 55
O. Kofoworola, S. Gheewala (2009)
Life cycle energy assessment of a typical office building in ThailandEnergy and Buildings, 41
S. Wilkinson (2011)
Sustainable retrofit potential in lower quality office stock in the central business district
R. Ball (2002)
Re use potential and vacant industrial premises: revisiting the regeneration issue in Stoke-on-TrentJournal of Property Research, 19
T. Ramesh, R. Prakash, K. Shukla (2010)
Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overviewEnergy and Buildings, 42
M. Kelly (2009)
Retrofitting the existing UK building stockBuilding Research & Information, 37
I. Sartori, A. Hestnes (2007)
Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review articleEnergy and Buildings, 39
R. Barras, P. Clark (1996)
Obsolescence and performance in the Central London office marketJournal of Property Valuation and Investment, 14
Adolf Acquaye, A. Duffy (2010)
Input-output analysis of Irish construction sector greenhouse gas emissionsBuilding and Environment, 45
Peter Bullen (2007)
Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildingsFacilities, 25
Ignacio Bribián, A. Usón, Sabina Scarpellini (2009)
Life cycle assessment in buildings: State-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certificationBuilding and Environment, 44
Damilola Ekundayo, S. Perera, Chika Udeaja, Lei Zhou (2012)
Carbon review and qualitative comparison of selected carbon counting tools
E. Rey (2004)
Office building retrofitting strategies: multicriteria approach of an architectural and technical issueEnergy and Buildings, 36
David Baccarini, G. Bateup (2008)
Benefits management in office fit‐out projectsFacilities, 26
K. Arge (2005)
Adaptable office buildings: theory and practiceFacilities, 23
J. Scrase (2001)
Curbing the growth in UK commercial energy consumptionBuilding Research & Information, 29
S. Wilkinson (2012)
Analysing sustainable retrofit potential in premium office buildingsStructural Survey, 30
A. Coelho, J. Brito (2012)
Influence of construction and demolition waste management on the environmental impact of buildings.Waste management, 32 3
A. Dimoudi, C. Tompa (2008)
Energy and environmental indicators related to construction of office buildingsResources Conservation and Recycling, 53
B. Winther, A. Hestnes (1999)
Solar versus green : The analysis of a Norwegian row House
G. Blengini (2009)
Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, ItalyBuilding and Environment, 44
N. Huberman, D. Pearlmutter (2008)
A life-cycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desertEnergy and Buildings, 40
S. Wilkinson, H. Remøy (2011)
Sustainability and within use office building adapations: A comparison of Dutch and Australian practices
Christoph Scheuer, G. Keoleian, Peter Reppe (2003)
Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implicationsEnergy and Buildings, 35
C. Warren (2003)
New working practice and office space density: a comparison of Australia and the UKFacilities, 21
P. Forsythe (2010)
Office Buildings - The Importance Of "Make Good", Fitout and Recurring Embodied Energy
Craig Roussac, C. McGee, George Milne (2008)
Changing the culture of commercial buildings in Australia: the role of green leases
G. Treloar, Andrew McCoubrie, P. Love, U. Iyer-Raniga (1999)
Embodied energy analysis of fixtures, fittings and furniture in office buildingsFacilities, 17
M. Dowson, A. Poole, D. Harrison, G. Susman (2012)
Domestic UK retrofit challenge: Barriers, incentives and current performance leading into the Green DealEnergy Policy, 50
Aistė Mickaityte, E. Zavadskas, A. Kaklauskas, L. Tupėnaitė (2008)
The concept model of sustainable buildings refurbishmentInternational Journal of Strategic Property Management, 12
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to quantify and profile the indicative amount of retrofits in office buildings as a necessary step in quantifying the recurring embodied energy in office buildings. Buildings are a major source of energy usage and emissions, and office buildings are a significant contributor to this situation. Life cycle assessments in this area have tended to neglect the potentially large impact arising from recurring embodied energy associated with office fit-out – which is often akin to a short-term consumable rather than a long-term durable in many multi-storey buildings. Design/methodology/approach – This study used building permit data from the Melbourne Central Business District ( n = 986) over the period 2006-2010 (inclusive) to quantify the number of retrofits and related trends. Building on this, a small number of targeted case study buildings were used to probe specific issues in profiling trends associated with high-frequency trends arising from the main sample. Findings – The data show that the number of retrofits varies according to location, grade, size and the age of buildings. Using the case study data, there is initial evidence to suggest that between 46 and 70 per cent of the floors in a high-rise office building will undergo retrofit in a five-year period. Further research should apply these data to recurring energy modelling for office buildings. Research limitations/implications – One limitation which applies to this study is that the research is limited to a defined geographical area in one Australian city, Melbourne. Secondly the study covers a specific period, and the number of retrofits may be affected negatively or positively depending on the prevailing market conditions. Practical implications – This paper raises important questions in respect of life cycle carbon emissions in the context of prevailing trends to shorter lease terms and practices around fit-out. Originality/value – The retrofit of office buildings tends to go unnoticed and unmeasured in the debate about sustainable buildings. The paper provides original thought development and important measurement input which will assist in providing a more accurate and meaningful life cycle assessment of office buildings.
Facilities – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 2, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.