Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

MEASURING CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE MODE AND ROCIII INSTRUMENTS USING SELF AND PEER RATINGS

MEASURING CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE MODE AND ROCIII INSTRUMENTS USING... This comparative study assesses the internal consistency reliability, rater bias, and convergent and discriminant validities of peer and self ratings for the MODE and ROCIII conflict management instruments. Additionally, the study examines the convergent and discriminant validities, and method variance of the two conflict instruments. BBA students N 133, divided into small teams, participated in a Business Policy Simulation Game. Participants rated their own conflict management styles and the styles of all members of their teams. Higher internal consistency reliability scores were found for the ROCIII than for the MODE. The complementary analyses of an ANOVA and a standard multitraitmultimethod analysis revealed greater convergence between the two rating sources on the dominating and avoiding styles for the MODE than for the ROCIII and higher convergence on the collaborating and compromising styles for the ROCIII than for the MODE. A moderately low convergence validity was found between the two instruments. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Conflict Management Emerald Publishing

MEASURING CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE MODE AND ROCIII INSTRUMENTS USING SELF AND PEER RATINGS

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/measuring-conflict-management-styles-a-comparison-between-the-mode-and-CZAKpewMk0
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1044-4068
DOI
10.1108/eb022714
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This comparative study assesses the internal consistency reliability, rater bias, and convergent and discriminant validities of peer and self ratings for the MODE and ROCIII conflict management instruments. Additionally, the study examines the convergent and discriminant validities, and method variance of the two conflict instruments. BBA students N 133, divided into small teams, participated in a Business Policy Simulation Game. Participants rated their own conflict management styles and the styles of all members of their teams. Higher internal consistency reliability scores were found for the ROCIII than for the MODE. The complementary analyses of an ANOVA and a standard multitraitmultimethod analysis revealed greater convergence between the two rating sources on the dominating and avoiding styles for the MODE than for the ROCIII and higher convergence on the collaborating and compromising styles for the ROCIII than for the MODE. A moderately low convergence validity was found between the two instruments.

Journal

International Journal of Conflict ManagementEmerald Publishing

Published: Mar 1, 1992

There are no references for this article.