Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the recent codification of the duties of nominee directors in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach – Comparative law and legal theory. Findings – The paper finds that the Malaysian approach to the duties of nominee directors is overly prescriptive and inconsistent with commercial reality. Practical implications – A review of the law on the duties of nominee directors in Malaysia is called for. Originality/value – This paper highlights the need for clear law reform objectives and made comparisons of the law across jurisdictions.
International Journal of Law and Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 11, 2008
Keywords: Directors; Corporate governance; Law reform; Malaysia
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.