Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/market-freedom-or-shareholders-protection-a-comparative-analysis-of-6rJwBNFxxv
References (42)
-
Juan Francisco (2009)
The Social Responsibility of the UniversityMindayawan Journal of Culture and Society, 2
-
10.2307/840878
-
Policy Framework
-
I. Ramsay, G. Stapledon (2001)
Corporate Groups in Australia, 29
-
Role and responsibilities of nominee directors
-
I. Ramsay (2006)
Models of Corporate Regulation: The Mandatory/Enabling Debate -
R. Tomasic, S. Bottomley, R. McQueen (2002)
Corporations Law in Australia -
R. Buxbaum (2002)
Facilitative and Mandatory Rules in the Corporation Law(s) of the United StatesAmerican Journal of Comparative Law, 50
-
J. Morgan (1960)
Report of the committee: For the year ended 31st December, 1959The Australian Surveyor, 18
-
A. Keay (2007)
Tackling the issue of the corporate objective: an analysis of the United Kingdom's 'enlightened shareholder value approach'Sydney Law Review, 29
-
Final Report
-
Company Directors: Regulating Conflicts of Interest and Formulating a Statement of Duties
-
A Consultative Document: On Clarifying and Reformulating the Directors' Roles and Duties
-
E. Dodd (1945)
Report of the Committee on Company Law AmendmentHarvard Law Review, 58
-
M. Whincop (1997)
Trivial Pursuit: A Theoretical Perspective on Simplification Initiatives, 7
-
Jeffery Gordon (1989)
The Mandatory Structure of Corporate LawColumbia Law Review, 89
-
Nominee Directors and Alternate Directors
-
Pearlie Koh (2007)
The Nominee Director's Tangled LotSingapore journal of legal studies, 2007
-
H. Ford, R. Austin, I. Ramsay (2005)
Ford's principles of corporations law -
Report on Corporate Governance
-
M. Salim (2006)
Legal Transplantation and Local Knowledge: Corporate Governance in Malaysia, 20
-
R. Carroll
Shadow director and other third party liability for corporate activity -
P. Davies, Sarah Worthington, Eva Micheler, L. Gower (1979)
Gower's Principles of modern company law -
C. Tan (2009)
Walter Woon on company law -
H. Bosch
Bosch on Business -
The Social Responsibility of Corporation
-
Martin Groenbaek, R. Romano (1994)
The Genius of American Corporate LawAmerican Journal of Comparative Law, 42
-
C. Parker (2000)
Reinventing Regulation within the CorporationAdministration & Society, 32
-
Report of the Company Law Committee
-
Bernard Black (2002)
Is Corporate Law Trivial?: A Political and Economic AnalysisNorthwestern University Law Review, 84
-
(1994)
Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory -
Corporations Law Simplification Program Task Force Plan of Action
-
Margaret Blair, Lynn Stout (1999)
A Team Production Theory of Corporate LawUniversity of California
-
R. Monks (2000)
Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: the strategic frameworkCorporate Governance: An International Review, 8
-
E.W. Thomas
The role of nominee directors and the liability of their appointors -
Corporate Responsibility: Managing Risk and Creating Value
-
Philip Lawton (1996)
Berle and Means, Corporate Governance and the Chinese Family FirmCorporate Governance & Law eJournal
-
M. Eisenberg, R. Winter, Fred McChesney (1989)
The Structure of Corporation LawColumbia Law Review, 89
-
Geoff Morse, Sarah Worthington
Palmer's Company Law -
M. Salim, Philip Lawton (2008)
The Law in a Post-Colonial State: The Shareholders' Oppression Remedy in MalaysiaGlobal Jurist, 8
-
D. Sugarman (1999)
Special issue of the Company Lawyer on the Law Commission's paper on company directors : regulating conflicts of interest and formulating a statement of duties. -
10.2307/1073662
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2008 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
- ISSN
- 1754-243X
- DOI
- 10.1108/17542430810890350
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the recent codification of the duties of nominee directors in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach – Comparative law and legal theory. Findings – The paper finds that the Malaysian approach to the duties of nominee directors is overly prescriptive and inconsistent with commercial reality. Practical implications – A review of the law on the duties of nominee directors in Malaysia is called for. Originality/value – This paper highlights the need for clear law reform objectives and made comparisons of the law across jurisdictions.
Journal
International Journal of Law and Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 11, 2008
Keywords: Directors; Corporate governance; Law reform; Malaysia