Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Mandatory vs voluntary exercise on non-financial reporting: does a normative/coercive isomorphism facilitate an increase in quality?

Mandatory vs voluntary exercise on non-financial reporting: does a normative/coercive isomorphism... This paper aims at investigating the quality of non-financial reporting (NFR) in light of Directive no. 2014/95/EU. Specifically, it focuses on the quality of NFR in Italian companies, as required by Legislative Decree no. 254/2016.Design/methodology/approachThe method used to develop the analysis is mainly qualitative. A content analysis of 184 non-financial reports (NFRs) was conducted on a sample of 92 companies that have been previously involved in the process of NFR on a voluntary basis. Then, a longitudinal analysis was carried out to assess the quality of the NFR conducted from a voluntary to a mandatory basis.FindingsThis study shows that the quality of NFR does not increase when moving from a voluntary to a mandatory basis, especially for 25% of the companies that publish supplementary sustainability reports and/or plans. This result demonstrates that preparers may perceive mandatory NFR as a comprehensive best practice to adequately report their social, economic and environmental performance.Originality/valueThe contribution of this research is threefold. Firstly, it contributes to the social and environmental accounting literature that focuses on NFR quality assessment. Secondly, it contributes to the literature that emphasizes the role of mimetic, coercive and normative isomorphism mechanisms on accounting systems and reporting practices. Thirdly, it contributes to the research gaps for academics highlighted by previous literature on mandatory corporate reporting as a consequence of normative requirements and on the relationship between regulation and mimetic, coercive and normative isomorphic mechanisms within organizations. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Meditari Accountancy Research Emerald Publishing

Mandatory vs voluntary exercise on non-financial reporting: does a normative/coercive isomorphism facilitate an increase in quality?

Download PDF
28 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/mandatory-vs-voluntary-exercise-on-non-financial-reporting-does-a-rAGPi3NUUi
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2049-372X
DOI
10.1108/medar-08-2019-0540
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper aims at investigating the quality of non-financial reporting (NFR) in light of Directive no. 2014/95/EU. Specifically, it focuses on the quality of NFR in Italian companies, as required by Legislative Decree no. 254/2016.Design/methodology/approachThe method used to develop the analysis is mainly qualitative. A content analysis of 184 non-financial reports (NFRs) was conducted on a sample of 92 companies that have been previously involved in the process of NFR on a voluntary basis. Then, a longitudinal analysis was carried out to assess the quality of the NFR conducted from a voluntary to a mandatory basis.FindingsThis study shows that the quality of NFR does not increase when moving from a voluntary to a mandatory basis, especially for 25% of the companies that publish supplementary sustainability reports and/or plans. This result demonstrates that preparers may perceive mandatory NFR as a comprehensive best practice to adequately report their social, economic and environmental performance.Originality/valueThe contribution of this research is threefold. Firstly, it contributes to the social and environmental accounting literature that focuses on NFR quality assessment. Secondly, it contributes to the literature that emphasizes the role of mimetic, coercive and normative isomorphism mechanisms on accounting systems and reporting practices. Thirdly, it contributes to the research gaps for academics highlighted by previous literature on mandatory corporate reporting as a consequence of normative requirements and on the relationship between regulation and mimetic, coercive and normative isomorphic mechanisms within organizations.

Journal

Meditari Accountancy Research – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 23, 2021

Keywords: Corporate reporting; Social and environmental accounting; Institutional isomorphism; Non-financial report

References

  • A descriptive analysis of environmental disclosure: a longitudinal study of French companies
    Albertini, E.
  • Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: the wireless communications industry
    Amir, E.; Lev, B.
  • Sustainable corporate social responsibility and the value chain
    Aras, G.; Crowther, D.
  • Corporate sustainability reporting: a study in disingenuity?
    Aras, G.; Crowther, D.
  • Quality of financial reporting: measuring qualitative characteristics
    Beest, F.V.; Braam, G.J.M.; Boelens, S.
  • Quality versus quantity: the case of forward-looking disclosure
    Beretta, S.; Bozzolan, S.
  • The relationship between investor materiality and the sustainable development goals: a methodological framework
    Betti, G.; Consolandi, C.; Eccles, R.G.
  • Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of a and a+ GRI reports
    Boiral, O.
  • Corporate social responsibility reporting: a comprehensive picture?
    Bouten, L.; Everaert, P.; Van Liedekerke, L.; De Moor, L.; Christiaens, J.
  • The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: a review of the literature in accounting and finance
    Brooks, C.; Oikonomou, I.
  • Leading practices in integrated reporting: management accountants will guide their companies on the journey to value creation
    Busco, C.; Quattrone, P.; Riccaboni, A.
  • Relabeling internal and external validity for applied social scientists
    Campbell, D.T.
  • Intra and intersectoral effects in environmental disclosures: evidence for legitimacy theory?
    Campbell, D.
  • The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: evidence from China
    Chen, Y.C.; Hung, M.; Wang, Y.
  • Member State Implementation of Directive 2014/95/EU
  • Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach
    Daub, C.H.
  • Enhancing the credibility of reporting on corporate social responsibility in Europe
    De Beelde, I.; Tuybens, S.
  • Integrated reporting: background, measurement issues, approaches and an agenda for future research
    De Villiers, C.; Venter, E.R.; Hsiao, P.C.K.
  • Introduction: the legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation
    Deegan, C.
  • Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: the roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency
    Dhaliwal, D.; Li, O.Z.; Tsang, A.; Yang, Y.G.
  • Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: international evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure
    Dhaliwal, D.S.; Radhakrishnan, S.; Tsang, A.; Yang, Y.G.
  • The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields
    Di Maggio, P.J.; Powell, W.W.
  • What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review
    Dienes, D.; Sassen, R.; Fischer, J.
  • Voluntary versus mandatory non-financial disclosure
    Doni, F.; Martini, S.B.; Corvino, A.; Mazzoni, M.
  • Barriers to implementing the international integrated reporting framework: a contemporary academic perspective
    Dumay, J.; Bernardi, C.; Guthrie, J.; La Torre, M.
  • Non-financial information: State of the art and research perspectives based on a bibliometric study
    Erkens, M.; Paugam, L.; Stolowy, H.
  • Directive as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups, 2014/95/EU
  • Harmonization in CSR reporting
    Fortanier, F.; Kolk, A.; Pinkse, J.
  • Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting
    Guthrie, J.; Petty, R.; Yongvanich, K.; Ricceri, F.
  • Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states
    Hąbek, P.; Wolniak, R.
  • Determinants of sustainability reporting: a review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research
    Hahn, R.; Kühnen, M.
  • The term ‘non-financial information’ – a semantic analysis of a key feature of current and future corporate reporting
    Haller, A.; Link, M.; Groß, T.
  • Human ecology
    Hawley, A.; Sills, D.L.
  • Social reporting and new governance regulation: the prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency
    Hess, D.
  • Between mandatory and voluntary: non-financial reporting by German companies
    Hoffmann, E.; Dietsche, C.; Hobelsberger, C.
  • Corporate social responsibility research in accounting
    Huang, X.B.; Watson, L.
  • The consequences of mandatory sustainability reporting
    Ioannou, I.; Serafeim, G.
  • Assessing quality of financial reporting
    Jonas, G.J.; Blanchet, J.
  • Reliability in content analysis
    Krippendorff, K.
  • Harmonising non-financial reporting regulation in Europe: practical forces and projections for future research
    La Torre, M.; Sabelfeld, S.; Blomkvist, M.; Tarquinio, L.; Dumay, J.
  • What does materiality mean to integrated reporting preparers? An empirical exploration
    Lai, A.; Melloni, G.; Stacchezzini, R.
  • Integrated reporting and narrative accountability: the role of preparers
    Lai, A.; Melloni, G.; Stacchezzini, R.
  • Corporate sustainable development: is ‘integrated reporting’ a legitimation strategy?
    Lai, A.; Melloni, G.; Stacchezzini, R.
  • The credibility of CSR (corporate social responsibility) reports in Europe. Evidence from a quantitative content analysis in 11 countries
    Lock, I.; Seele, P.
  • Ensuring more sustainable reporting in Europe using non-financial disclosure – de facto and de jure evidence
    Manes-Rossi, F.; Tiron-Tudor, A.; Nicolò, G.; Zanellato, G.
  • The role of stakeholders in sustainability reporting assurance
    Manetti, G.; Toccafondi, S.
  • Effect of financial reporting quality on sustainability information disclosure
    Martínez-Ferrero, J.; Garcia-Sanchez, I.M.; Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B.
  • CSR disclosure in Polish-listed companies in the light of directive 2014/95/EU requirements: empirical evidence
    Matuszak, Ł.; Różańska, E.
  • CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: an empirical analysis
    Michelon, G.; Pilonato, S.; Ricceri, F.
  • The social construction of organizational knowledge: a study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism
    Mizruchi, M.S.; Fein, L.C.
  • Scoring corporate environmental reports for comprehensiveness: a comparison of three systems
    Morhardt, J.E.
  • Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria
    Morhardt, J.E.; Baird, S.; Freeman, K.
  • Evidence of assurance enhancing the quality of voluntary environmental disclosures: an empirical analysis
    Moroney, R.; Windsor, C.; Aw, Y.T.
  • Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: a critical evaluation
    O’Dwyer, B.; Owen, D.L.
  • The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note
    Patten, D.M.
  • Multinationals’ accountability on sustainability: the evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports
    Perego, P.; Kolk, A.
  • Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice
    Pettigrew, A.M.
  • L’information non financière. Clarification d’un concept en vogue
    Protin, P.; Gonthier-Besacier, N.; Disle, C.; Bertrand, F.; Périer, S.
  • Policy transfer in the European Union: institutional isomorphism as a source of legitimacy
    Radaelli, C.M.
  • Nonfinancial disclosures across Anglo-American countries
    Robb, S.W.; Zarzeski, L.E.S.T.
  • Scoring CSR reporting in listed companies – evidence from Italian best practices
    Romolini, A.; Fissi, S.; Gori, E.
  • Institutional isomorphism and corporate social responsibility: towards a conceptual model
    Roszkowska-Menkes, M.; Aluchna, M.
  • The adolescence of institutional theory
    Scott, W.R.
  • Empirical analysis of non-financial reporting by Spanish companies
    Sierra-Garcia, L.; Garcia-Benau, M.A.; Bollas-Araya, H.M.
  • Development of an evaluation methodology for triple bottom line reports using international standards on reporting
    Skouloudis, A.; Evangelinos, K.; Kourmousis, F.
  • The expansion of non-financial reporting: an exploratory study
    Stolowy, H.; Paugam, L.
  • Directive 2014/95/EU: are Italian companies already compliant?
    Venturelli, A.; Caputo, F.; Cosma, S.; Leopizzi, R.; Pizzi, S.
  • How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? Processes and consequences of adopting the global reporting initiative
    Vigneau, L.; Humphreys, M.; Moon, J.
  • Making sustainability meaningful: aspirations, discourses and reporting practices
    Busco, C.; Giovannoni, E.; Granà, F.; Izzo, M.F.
  • Does isomorphism legitimate?
    Deephouse, D.L.
  • Sustainability accounting
    Zvezdov, D.; Schaltegger, S.; Idowu, S.O.; Capaldi, N.; Zu, L.; Gupta, A.D.