Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Bob Avary (1980)
Ego States: Manifestations of Psychic Organs:Transactional Analysis Journal, 10
Philip Hallinger, L. Bickman, Kenn Davis (1996)
School Context, Principal Leadership, and Student Reading AchievementThe Elementary School Journal, 96
P Hallinger, L Bickman, K Davis
School context, principal leadership and student achievement
P Hallinger
Changing norms of principal leadership in the United States
R. Heck, T. Larsen, G. Marcoulides (1990)
Instructional Leadership and School Achievement:Validation of a Causal ModelEducational Administration Quarterly, 26
J Hannaway, L Sproull
Who’s running the show? Coordination and control of instruction in educational organizations
P Duigham
Administrative behavior of school superintendents: a descriptive study
F. Heider (1958)
The psychology of interpersonal relations
P Heck, T. Larson, G Marcoulides
Principal instructional leadership and school achievement: validation of a causal model
A. Manasse (1983)
Improving Conditions for Principal Effectiveness: Policy Implications of ResearchThe Elementary School Journal, 85
J. Murphy
The reform of school administration: pressures and calls for change
G. Graen (1977)
Effects of Linking-Pin Quality on the Quality of Working Life of Lower Participants.Administrative Science Quarterly, 22
M. James (1975)
The OK boss
P. Hill, G. Foster, T. Gendler (1990)
High schools with character
L Fenwick, H. Murlis
Managing Performance
A.L. Manasse
Principals as leaders of high‐performing systems
K Peterson
Making sense of principal’s work
C. Argyris, R. Harrison (1962)
Interpersonal competence and organizational effectivenessAmerican Sociological Review, 27
U Pareek
Training Instruments for Human Resources Development
H. Sullivan (1953)
The interpersonal theory of psychiatry
K. Weick (1982)
Administering Education in Loosely Coupled Schools.Phi Delta Kappan, 63
N. Pitner, Ogawa R
Organizational leadership: the case of the superintendent
T. Deal, Lynn Celotti (1980)
How Much Influence Do (and Can) Educational Administrators Have on ClassroomsPhi Delta Kappan, 61
Research in educational settings has indicated, inter alia, that the organizer and administrator’s personality (principal’s), ways of working, the nature of her/his interpersonal relationships and administrative practices or behavior are likely to be some of the important reasons behind the differential performance of schools. Perhaps, this is so because “experience without wisdom” can be a trap. Headships who reflect on their own interpersonal behavior create opportunities for components of the school (teachers, students, non‐academics and parents) to realize their individual capabilities in the face of rapidly changing demands of growth and job satisfaction (e.g. reduced interpersonal conflicts). Every such stakeholder has an eye on the managerial capabilities of the principal of the school. Thus, more interpersonally skillful and gifted the leadership available in a school, the more performing the institution.
International Journal of Educational Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 2000
Keywords: Management styles; Management roles; Schools
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.