Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Nassir, S. Mohd, Mee Ngu (1997)
Selectivity and timing: evidence from the performance of Malaysian unit trusts
F. Fabozzi, J. Francis (1979)
Mutual Fund Systematic Risk for Bull and Bear Markets: An Empirical ExaminationERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk (Topic)
S. Mohamad, A. Nassir (1995)
The Performance of Unit Trusts in Malaysia: Some Evidence, 3
Mark Grinblatt, S. Titman (1989)
Mutual Fund Performance: An Analysis of Quarterly Portfolio HoldingsThe Journal of Business, 62
ZimmermannHeinz, Zogg-WetterClaudia (1992)
On Detecting Selection and Timing Ability: The Case of Stock Market IndexesFinancial Analysts Journal, 48
Tang Chuan (1995)
The Investment Performance of Unit Trust Funds in Malaysia, 3
Roy. Henriksson (1984)
Market Timing and Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical InvestigationThe Journal of Business, 57
E. Chang, Wilbur Lewellen (1984)
Market Timing and Mutual Fund Investment PerformanceThe Journal of Business, 57
B. Malkiel (1995)
Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971 to 1991Journal of Finance, 50
Dwight Grant (1977)
Portfolio Performance and the "Cost" of Timing DecisionsJournal of Finance, 32
T. Miller, N. Gressis (1980)
Nonstationarity and Evaluation of Mutual Fund PerformanceJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 15
Richard Ippolito (1993)
On Studies of Mutual Fund Performance, 1962–1991Financial Analysts Journal, 49
Carl Chen, Cheng-Few Lee, Shafiqur Rahman, Anthony Chan (1992)
A CROSS‐SECTIONAL ANALYSIS OF MUTUAL FUNDS’MARKET TIMING AND SECURITY SELECTION SKILLJournal of Business Finance & Accounting, 19
Mee Aw (1997)
Measuring unit trust fund performance using different benchmarks / Aw Mee Wah
Cheng-Few Lee, Shafiqur Rahman (1990)
Market Timing, Selectivity, and Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical InvestigationThe Journal of Business, 63
Y. BelloZakri, JanjigianVahan (1997)
A Reexamination of the Market-Timing and Security-Selection Performance of Mutual FundsFinancial Analysts Journal, 53
B. Lehmann (1987)
Orthogonal Frontiers and Alternative Mean-Variance Efficiency TestsJournal of Finance, 42
Mark Grinblatt, S. Titman (1994)
A Study of Monthly Mutual Fund Returns and Performance Evaluation TechniquesJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29
Cheol Eun, R. Kolodny, Bruce Resnick (1991)
U.S.–based international mutual funds, 17
S. Low, N. Ghazali (2005)
An evaluation of the market-timing and security-selection performance of mutual funds: The case of Malaysia
M. Jensen (1967)
The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964Harvard Business School: Negotiation
K. Brown, G. Brown (1987)
Does the Composition of the Market Portfolio Really Matter?, 13
G. Kao, Louis Cheng, Kam Chan (1998)
International mutual fund selectivity and market timing during up and down market conditionsThe Financial Review, 33
Gregory Connor, Robert Korajczyk (1990)
The attributes, behavior, and performance of U.S. mutual fundsReview of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1
Joon Chan, Seng Koh, Francis Koh (1985)
Unit Trusts in Singapore, 11
Stanley Block, D. French (2000)
The effect of portfolio weighting on investment performance evaluation: The case of actively managed mutual fundsJournal of Economics and Finance, 26
L. Hin, Aw Wah (1997)
Measuring Unit Trust Fund Performance Using Different Benchmarks, 5
Kent Daniel, Mark Grinblatt, S. Titman, Russ Wermers (1997)
Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarksJournal of Finance, 52
M. Firth (1977)
The Investment Performance of Unit Trusts in the Period 1965-75Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 9
Stanley Kon (1983)
The Market-Timing Performance of Mutual Fund ManagersThe Journal of Business, 56
Stanley Kon, F. Jen (1978)
Estimation of Time-Varying Systematic Risk and Performance for Mutual Fund Portfolios: An Application of Switching RegressionJournal of Finance, 33
G. McDonald (2009)
OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS June 1974 OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE OF MUTUAL FUNDS , 1960-1969
(1987)
Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation: A Comparison of Benchmarks and Benchmark Comparisons
William Droms, David Walker (1994)
Investment Performance of International Mutual FundsJournal of Financial Research, 17
Stanley Kon, F. Jen (1979)
The Investment Performance of Mutual Funds: An Empirical Investigation of Timing, Selectivity, and Market EfficiencyThe Journal of Business, 52
Richard Roll (1978)
AMBIGUITY WHEN PERFORMANCE IS MEASURED BY THE SECURITIES MARKET LINEJournal of Finance, 33
E. Elton, M. Gruber, Sanjiv Das, M. Hlavka (1993)
Efficiency with Costly Information: A Reinterpretation of Evidence from Managed PortfoliosReview of Financial Studies, 6
R. Cumby, J. Glen (1990)
Evaluating the Performance of International Mutual FundsJournal of Finance, 45
Arthur Darrow, Douglas Kahl (1982)
A Comparison of Moderated Regression Techniques Considering Strength of EffectJournal of Management, 8
M. Jensen (1969)
Risk, the Pricing of Capital Assets, and the Evaluation of Investment PortfoliosHarvard Business School: Negotiation
R. Carlson (1970)
Aggregate Performance of Mutual Funds, 1948–1967Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 5
David Volkman (1999)
Market Volatility and Perverse Timing Performance of Mutual Fund ManagersJournal of Financial Research, 22
Francis Koh, Seng Koh, T. Cheng (1987)
An Empirical Analysis of the Performance of Unit Trusts in Singapore, 2
Mark Grinblatt, S. Titman (1993)
Performance Measurement without Benchmarks: An Examination of Mutual Fund ReturnsThe Journal of Business, 66
Purpose – The paper seeks to examine whether selectivity and timing performance of fund manager is sensitive to the choice of market benchmarks. The two benchmarks used are the Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI) and the Exchange Main Board All‐Share (EMAS) Index. Design/methodology/approach – The paper seeks to employed Jensen's model to estimate the overall fund performance and Henriksson and Merton's model to separate the fund manager's investment performance into the selectivity and market‐timing components. Findings – The findings indicate that, on average, the funds display negative overall performance with either the KLCI or the EMAS Index. In addition, there is little variation in the manager's market‐timing and selectivity performance across alternative market benchmarks. It is also reported that a manager's poor timing ability contributes significantly to the fund's negative overall performance. Research limitations/implications – The paper employed just two market benchmarks. Inclusion of more market benchmarks in future research may provide further support for the existing findings. Practical implications – Regardless of the market benchmarks used, the results imply that fund managers should seriously reassess their market timing efforts, given that their predictions are very often in the wrong direction than in the right direction. Such findings suggest that no economic benefit accrues to the average fund manager involved in market‐timing activities. Originality/value – The paper provides first evidence on the sensitivity of a fund manager's separate investment components (timing and selectivity) to different specification of the market benchmarks.
Managerial Finance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 23, 2007
Keywords: Unit trusts; Fund management benchmarking; Securities; Market outing; Malaysia
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.