Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Long, P. Tirschwell (2003)
International Logistics: Global Supply Chain Management
J. Bessant, J. Tidd (2007)
Innovation and Entrepreneurship
J. McNiff, J. Whitehead (2000)
Action research in organisations
D. Flint, J. Mentzer (1997)
VALIDITY IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH.Journal of Business Logistics
Általános tudományok (2010)
Diffusion of Innovations
S. Kurnia, R. Johnston (1999)
The mutuality of ECR benefits, costs and risks in supply chain reform
Jesper Aastrup, Á. Halldórsson (2008)
Epistemological role of case studies in logistics: A critical realist perspectiveInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38
Dag Näslund, R. Frankel, Yemisi Bulomole (2005)
Entering the White Space of Logistics ResearchJournal of Business Logistics, 26
S. Kvale (1996)
Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewingEvaluation and Program Planning, 3
C. Lynch (1997)
logistics outsourcing -- a management guide
Larry Huston, N. Sakkab (2006)
Connect and Develop : Inside Procter & Gamble's New Model for InnovationHarvard Business Review, 84
J. Nathan, J. Trinkaus (1996)
Improving health care means spending more time with patients and less time with inventory.Hospital materiel management quarterly, 18 2
J. Raelin, D. Coghlan (2006)
Developing Managers as Learners and Researchers: Using Action Learning and Action ResearchJournal of Management Education, 30
Clayton Christensen, M. Raynor (2003)
The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth
Stephan Wagner (2008)
Innovation Management in the German Transportation IndustryJournal of Business Logistics, 29
I. Stuart, David McCutcheon, R. Handfield, R. McLachlin, D. Samson (2002)
Effective case research in operations management: a process perspectiveJournal of Operations Management, 20
Chris Huxham (1996)
Action Research for Management ResearchBritish Journal of Management, 7
G. Susman, R. Evered (1978)
An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research.Administrative Science Quarterly, 23
Lars Fuglsang, Jon Sundbo (2002)
Innovation as Strategic Reflexivity
R. Germain, Cornelia Drsoge, Nancy Spears (1996)
THE IMPLICATIONS OF JUST-IN-TIME FOR LOGISTICS ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE /Journal of Business Logistics
Allan Afuah (1997)
Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation, and Profits
M. Sawhney, R. Wolcott, Inigo Arroniz (2012)
The 12 different ways for companies to innovateIEEE Engineering Management Review, 35
R. Yin (1984)
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Dag Näslund (2002)
Logistics needs qualitative research – especially action researchInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32
C. Medlin (2007)
Case Study Research
K. Eisenhardt (1989)
Building theories from case study researchSTUDI ORGANIZZATIVI
Ernest Stringer (1996)
Action research : a handbook for practitioners
Carl Wallenburg (2009)
INNOVATION IN LOGISTICS OUTSOURCING RELATIONSHIPS: PROACTIVE IMPROVEMENT BY LOGISTICS SERVICE PROVIDERS AS A DRIVER OF CUSTOMER LOYALTYJournal of Supply Chain Management, 45
R. Rapoport (1970)
Three Dilemmas in Action ResearchHuman Relations, 23
D. Flint, E. Larsson, B. Gammelgaard, J. Mentzer (2005)
Logistics Innovation: A customer Value-Oriented Social ProcessJournal of Business Logistics, 26
J. Tidd, J. Bessant, K. Pavitt (2001)
Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition
Michael Kinney, William Wempe (2002)
Further Evidence on the Extent and Origins of JIT's Profitability EffectsThe Accounting Review, 77
K. Ferdows, Michael Lewis, J. Machuca (2004)
Rapid-Fire FulfillmentHarvard Business Review, 82
D. Flint, E. Larsson, B. Gammelgaard (2008)
Exploring processes for customer value insights, supply chain learning and innovation: An international studyJournal of Business Logistics, 29
Subroto Roy, K. Sivakumar, I. Wilkinson (2004)
Innovation generation in supply chain relationships: A conceptual model and research propositionsJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32
B. Flyvbjerg (2006)
Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study ResearchQualitative Inquiry, 12
H. Chesbrough (2003)
The Era of Open InnovationMIT Sloan Management Review, 44
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to learn more about logistics innovation processes and their implications for the focal organization as well as the supply chain, especially suppliers. Design/methodology/approach – The empirical basis of the study is a longitudinal action research project that was triggered by the practical needs of new ways of handling material flows of a hospital. This approach made it possible to revisit theory on logistics innovation process. Findings – Apart from the tangible benefits reported to the case hospital, five findings can be extracted from this study: the logistics innovation process model may include not just customers but also suppliers; logistics innovation in buyer‐supplier relations may serve as an alternative to outsourcing; logistics innovation processes are dynamic and may improve supplier partnerships; logistics innovations in the supply chain are as dependent on internal stakeholders as on external relationships; and logistics innovation process may start out as a dialectic, conflict ridden process and end up in a well‐ordered goal‐oriented teleological process. Research limitations/implications – In general, the study contributes to the knowledge base of innovation process in logistics that is still sparse although literature on innovation in many other disciplines is well‐developed. As this research is only one study highlighting a special context of a hospital, further studies on the dynamic logistics innovation processes and their implications for the relevant parties as well as the supply chain are needed. This study does not claim statistical generalizability of the findings but provides insight into complex organizational processes that, for example, surveys cannot. Practical implications – The findings of the study have provided valuable insights into the process of a logistics innovation in an oriental healthcare supply chain context. The study is, however, still limited in disclosing end‐to‐end supply chain benefits including concrete performance improvements at the suppliers. Examining logistics innovation processes should result not only in the implementation of innovative processes, but also in improved supplier relations leading to improved financial results in the supply chain. Originality/value – The paper adds to the knowledge of the dynamic processes of logistics innovation both downstream and upstream in a supply chain. It elaborates on an existing model by methodological triangulation in order to learn more about the qualities of actual processes and their implications for theory and practice.
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 12, 2011
Keywords: Logistics innovation; Logistics processes; Healthcare supply chain; Action research; Hospitals; Taiwan
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.