Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
We at the IJIS continue to be amazed at the fluidity and dynamic nature of innovation. It seems that as soon as we feel like we are getting a handle on innovation another contributing author causes us to take pause and ponder our own understanding again. For example, in the edition, Hakkarainen writes that the Innovation Funnel is a fallacy. This title took me by surprise when I first read it, but he makes many interesting comments resulting in an unsettling feeling that I may be mistaken. An illustration I really enjoyed in this paper is the pond full of frogs’ analogy; that as far as innovation goes, you should not push everything through a funnel. Instead you should pick up each of the frogs in the pond, kiss it, see which one might be an enchanted prince. Upon finding a prince, one should school it in the ways of a king and let the rest go back to the pond (perhaps to be kissed again later). In the Ortega paper, they authors did a very nice job of making the point that socially focused organizations (or any for that matter) should utilize social impact models in determining a
International Journal of Innovation Science – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.