Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Lessons learnt from complaints by surgical patients

Lessons learnt from complaints by surgical patients Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse the complaints received from surgical patients and provide suggestions to reduce them. Design/methodology/approach – The authors conducted a retrospective study of 100 complaints received from surgical patients over a two‐year period between January 2004 and December 2005. Data was obtained through the complaints department and summaries of all the complaints were analysed. Findings – There were 47 males and the median age was 58 years (range 13‐92). Of complaints, 44 per cent were received from outpatients and 56 per cent from inpatients. The main reasons for complaints from outpatients were appointment delays or cancellations (54.6 per cent), followed by clinical treatment (20.5 per cent), communication issues (13.6 per cent), attitude of staff (9.1 per cent) and miscellaneous (2.25 per cent). For inpatients, the main reasons were clinical treatment (39.3 per cent) followed by delay in admission/investigations (25 per cent), communication (17.9 per cent), attitude of staff (10.7 per cent) and miscellaneous (7.1 per cent). The outpatients complain mostly about administrative problems whereas inpatients complain about clinical care. Communication problems and staff attitude are the next most common in either setting. Providing patients with clear patient information about admission, treatment and waiting times would help to reduce complaints. Originality/value – The paper shows that adopting an empathetic approach to patients and understanding their concerns and anxieties would improve patient satisfaction. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Clinical Governance An International Journal Emerald Publishing

Lessons learnt from complaints by surgical patients

Download PDF
4 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/lessons-learnt-from-complaints-by-surgical-patients-qzyJGTSk23

References (1)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1477-7274
DOI
10.1108/14777270710775864
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse the complaints received from surgical patients and provide suggestions to reduce them. Design/methodology/approach – The authors conducted a retrospective study of 100 complaints received from surgical patients over a two‐year period between January 2004 and December 2005. Data was obtained through the complaints department and summaries of all the complaints were analysed. Findings – There were 47 males and the median age was 58 years (range 13‐92). Of complaints, 44 per cent were received from outpatients and 56 per cent from inpatients. The main reasons for complaints from outpatients were appointment delays or cancellations (54.6 per cent), followed by clinical treatment (20.5 per cent), communication issues (13.6 per cent), attitude of staff (9.1 per cent) and miscellaneous (2.25 per cent). For inpatients, the main reasons were clinical treatment (39.3 per cent) followed by delay in admission/investigations (25 per cent), communication (17.9 per cent), attitude of staff (10.7 per cent) and miscellaneous (7.1 per cent). The outpatients complain mostly about administrative problems whereas inpatients complain about clinical care. Communication problems and staff attitude are the next most common in either setting. Providing patients with clear patient information about admission, treatment and waiting times would help to reduce complaints. Originality/value – The paper shows that adopting an empathetic approach to patients and understanding their concerns and anxieties would improve patient satisfaction.

Journal

Clinical Governance An International Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Aug 14, 2007

Keywords: Hospitals; Complaints; Patient care; Surgery; Customer satisfaction

There are no references for this article.