Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Linda Lotto (1986)
Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods, 8
A. Leont’ev, M. Hall (1978)
Activity, consciousness, and personality
F. Fisher (2005)
EcoLiteracy and MetaResponsibility: ‘Steps to an Ecology of Mind’Systemic Practice and Action Research, 18
C. Bereiter (1985)
Toward a Solution of the Learning ParadoxReview of Educational Research, 55
G. Boterf (2002)
Développer la compétence des professionnels
D. Fay, M. Frese (2001)
The Concept of Personal Initiative: An Overview of Validity StudiesHuman Performance, 14
R. Lewontin, R. Levins (1997)
Organism and environmentCapitalism Nature Socialism, 8
M. Frese, Wolfgang Kring, Andrea Soose, Jeannette Zempel (1996)
Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West GermanyInorganica Chimica Acta
U. Klemola, L. Norros (1997)
Analysis of the clinical behaviour of anaesthetists: recognition of uncertainty as a basis for practiceMedical Education, 31
P. Vaill, C. Byrnes (1996)
Learning as a way of being
Yrjö Engeström (2000)
Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work.Ergonomics, 43 7
M. Frese, D. Fay, Tanja Hilburger, Karena Leng, Almut Tag (1997)
The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samplesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Peter Smith (2001)
Work‐based Learning: The New Frontier of Management DevelopmentJournal of Workplace Learning, 13
B. Mansfield, Lindsay Mitchell (1996)
Towards a Competent Workforce
The presented instrument for competence assessment is used in an attempt to make a systematic assessment of what and how much has been learned by an individual employee at a certain point of time in his/her career within an enterprise. Competencies in different work areas are treated: handling functional work tasks, managing disturbances, prioritising, co-operating, organising, and achieving quality and environmental targets. All competencies are assessed on a scale measuring level of competence as cognitive complexity. Application of the instrument involves conducting a structured interview where the means-goal relationship in different work activities is investigated in detail. A quantitative analysis of level of competence in each work area, ranging from behavioural routines to the extent to which an individual contributes to developing and changing his/her task, is then performed. The results of two different tests of inter-rater reliability and six tests of validity (content, face and criterion validity) are presented. It is concluded that the instrument is adequately valid and reliable.
The Learning Organization – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 2003
Keywords: Assessment; Lifelong learning; Enterprise economics; Workplace learning; Methodology
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.