Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Saad, A. Al-Ashaab, M. Maksimovic, L. Zhu, E. Shehab, P. Ewers, A. Kassam (2013)
A3 thinking approach to support knowledge-driven designThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68
Joe Anderson, J. Morgan, Susan Williams (2010)
Using Toyota's A3 Thinking for Analyzing MBA Business CasesDecision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 9
Mírian Freitas (1998)
Focus group – pesquisa qualitativa: resgatando a teoria, instrumentalizando o seu planejamento, 33
A. Alves, J. Dinis-Carvalho, R. Sousa (2012)
Lean production as promoter of thinkers to achieve companies' agilityThe Learning Organization, 19
Manimay Ghosh (2012)
A3 Process: A Pragmatic Problem-Solving Technique for Process Improvement in Health CareJournal of Health Management, 14
Paul Fuller, A. Dainty, T. Thorpe (2011)
Improving project learning: a new approach to lessons learntInternational Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4
Diane Kimsey (2010)
Lean methodology in health care.AORN journal, 92 1
M. Driver (2003)
Diversity and learning in groupsThe Learning Organization, 10
David Lamb (2015)
Learning about events through involvement and participation: The use of experiential and authentic learning experiencesInternational Journal of Event and Festival Management, 6
Sören Ulonska, T. Welo (2013)
New Perspectives in the Quest for Unification of ‘Lean’ with Traditional Engineering Design Methodology
Brian Rafferty (2009)
Understanding A3 Thinking: A Critical Component of Toyota's PDCA Management System by Durward K. Sobek II and Art SmalleyJournal of Product Innovation Management, 26
Norhairin Saad, A. Al-Ashaab, E. Shehab, M. Maksimovic (2013)
A3 Thinking Approach to Support Problem Solving in Lean Product and Process Development
P. Borches, G. Bonnema (2010)
3.3.1 A3 Architecture Overviews: Focusing architectural knowledge to support evolution of complex systems *INCOSE International Symposium, 20
J. Bassuk, Ida Washington (2013)
The A3 Problem Solving Report: A 10-Step Scientific Method to Execute Performance Improvements in an Academic Research VivariumPLoS ONE, 8
O. Filho, R. Calado (2013)
Learning Supply Chain Management by PBL with A3 Report SupportIFAC Proceedings Volumes, 46
José Neves (1996)
PESQUISA QUALITATIVA - CARACTERÍSTICAS, USOS E POSSIBILIDADES
Pamela Loewen, R. Loo (2004)
Assessing team climate by qualitative and quantitative approachesThe Learning Organization, 11
Purpose– This study aims to propose a complementary method to the A3 information collection, data analysis and capturing and sharing knowledge to facilitate problem solving in a general framework. The incorporation of this method minimizes the difficulties identified in the literature focused on continuous improvement of processes. The method comprises combining triangulation techniques utilizing focus groups for a survey of qualitative data and the approach called Look – Ask – Model – Discuss – Act (LAMDA), which was originally designed for cycles of knowledge creation applied in product development processes. Design/methodology/approach– The methodology proposed in this work follows the A3 report approach including focus groups’ techniques in the planning step and problem analysis and the use of the LAMDA learning cycle, aiming to fill the gaps in A3 method. Therefore, the methodology includes five macro steps, which are divided into smaller steps. Note that the inclusion of the LAMDA learning cycle in the A3 report is called A3LAMDA. In addition, macro steps from 1 to 4 belong to “knowledge creation” step and macro step 5 deals with the “Capture of knowledge” step. Along the proposed methodology application, greater focus will be given to techniques incorporated in the A3 report, as they represent the main contribution of this method. Findings– The proposed approach to the A3 report was more concise and comprehensive, allowing different views and perspectives to be considered to understand the problem and find solutions through the focus groups method. In addition, the development of a structured questionnaire for the interviews encouraged the participants to present their opinions regarding the problem hypotheses. The use of the LAMDA learning cycle was essential to capture and share the knowledge acquired during the problem-solving process. It allowed not only the reflection on the aspects that have either worked or not but also the understanding of how to do the next work differently. Originality/value– This study aims to propose a complementary method to the A3 information collection, data analysis and capturing and sharing knowledge to facilitate problem solving in the general framework. The incorporation of this method minimizes the difficulties identified in the literature that focused on continuous improvement of processes.
The Learning Organization – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 11, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.