Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Senge (1997)
THE FIFTH DISCIPLINEMeasuring Business Excellence, 1
J. Caron, S. Jarvenpaa, Donna Stoddard (1994)
Business reengineering at CIGNA Corporation: experiences and lessons learned from the first five yearsManagement Information Systems Quarterly, 18
Frederick Sturdivant, Francis Gouillart (1994)
Spend a day in the life of your customersHarvard Business Review, 72
H. Simon, W. Chase (1988)
Skill in ChessAmerican Scientist, 61
W. Deming (1982)
Out of the Crisis
M. Hammer (1990)
Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate
E. Hall, J. Rosenthal, Judy Wade (1994)
How to Make Reengineering Really Work
Alvin Toffler (1990)
Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century
Fred Kofman, P. Senge (1993)
Communities of commitment: The heart of learning organizationsOrganizational Dynamics, 22
V. Patel, G. Groen (1991)
The general and specific nature of medical expertise: A critical look.
F. Taylor, 马 风才 (2014)
科学管理原理=The principles of scientific management
M. McGill, J. Slocum (1993)
Unlearning the organizationOrganizational Dynamics, 22
H. Harrington (1991)
Business process improvement : the breakthrough strategy for total quality, productivity, and competitiveness
T. Davenport, Donna Stoddard (1994)
Reengineering: Business Change of Mythic Proportions?MIS Q., 18
Joseph Juran (1989)
Juran on Leadership For Quality
P. Checkland (1981)
Systems Thinking, Systems Practice
K. Holyoak (1991)
Symbolic connectionism: Toward third-generation theories of expertise.
P. Drucker (1989)
The New RealitiesForeign Affairs, 68
J. Walsh (1995)
Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory LaneOrganization Science, 6
P. Gordon (1983)
The mind of the strategist: The art of Japanese business: by Kenichi Ohmae New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982Business Horizons, 26
M. Hammer, J. Champy (1993)
Reengineering the Corporation
Discusses the concepts of knowledge, information and data. Analyses the concept of knowledge organizations with the focus on its reliance on knowledge workers and intense information flow. Based on the previous discussion, critically analyses four contemporary myths: (1) process improvement should focus on activities; (2) process improvement should itself be a top‐down process; (3) organizations should be learning systems; and (4) fragmentation should be avoided. Argues that these myths are particularly deceiving and potentially dangerous owing to their incompatibility with the concept of knowledge organizations and the way these organizations operate.
The Learning Organization – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 1, 1996
Keywords: BPR; Knowledge‐based systems; Learning organizations; Myths
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.