Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Rafferty, N. Jimmieson (2017)
Subjective Perceptions of Organizational Change and Employee Resistance to Change: Direct and Mediated Relationships with Employee Well‐BeingLabor: Personnel Economics eJournal
Dennis Erwin, A. Garman (2010)
RESISTANCE TO ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE: LINKING RESEARCH AND PRACTICELeadership & Organization Development Journal, 31
F. Emery, E. Trist (1965)
The Causal Texture of Organizational EnvironmentsHuman Relations, 18
Rune By (2005)
Organisational change management: A critical reviewJournal of Change Management, 5
E. Morrison, Frances Milliken (2000)
Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic WorldAcademy of Management Review, 25
Adrianna Kezar (2001)
Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century : recent research and conceptualizations
R. Ackoff, Jamshid Gharajedaghi (1996)
Reflections on systems and their modelsSystems Research, 13
J. Kotter (2009)
Leading change: why transformation efforts failIEEE Engineering Management Review, 37
Eric Dent, S. Goldberg (1999)
Challenging “Resistance to Change”The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35
R. Steurer, Markus Langer, Astrid Konrad, A. Martinuzzi (2005)
Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business–Society RelationsJournal of Business Ethics, 61
David Nadler, M. Tushman (1990)
Beyond the Charismatic Leader: Leadership and Organizational ChangeCalifornia Management Review, 32
B. Burnes (1996)
No such thing as … a “one best way” to manage organizational changeManagement Decision, 34
A. Armenakis, A. Bedeian (1999)
Organizational Change: A Review of Theory and Research in the 1990sJournal of Management, 25
(1956)
Self-regulation and requisite variety
R. Ackoff (1998)
A Systemic View of Transformational LeadershipSystemic Practice and Action Research, 11
Stephen Jones, A. Ven (2016)
The Changing Nature of Change ResistanceThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52
Carrie Leana, B. Barry (2000)
Stability and Change as Simultaneous Experiences in Organizational LifeAcademy of Management Review, 25
T. Donaldson, L. Preston (1995)
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and ImplicationsAcademy of Management Review, 20
R. Allio (2003)
Russell L. Ackoff, iconoclastic management authority, advocates a “systemic” approach to innovationStrategy & Leadership, 31
S. Levin (1998)
Ecosystems and the Biosphere as Complex Adaptive SystemsEcosystems, 1
S. Piderit (2000)
Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: A Multidimensional View of Attitudes Toward an Organizational ChangeAcademy of Management Review, 25
B. Schneider, A. Brief, Richard Guzzo (1996)
Creating a climate and culture for sustainable organizational changeOrganizational Dynamics, 24
M. Val, Clara Fuentes (2003)
Resistance to change: a literature review and empirical studyManagement Decision, 41
P. Strebel (1994)
Choosing the Right Change PathCalifornia Management Review, 36
PurposeOrganizational change is one of the most researched issues in management and leadership. Change is generally viewed as necessary, with positive outcomes for all stakeholders. Resistance is consequently seen as a surprising outcome. However, much of the management literature focuses on change as organizational dynamics-driven, especially by those at the top, in the interests of those at the top, often with scant attention to the role of employees. The purpose of this paper is to take a different perspective, grounded in the systems theory.Design/methodology/approachThis is a conceptual paper. The authors critically examine theoretical explanations of resistance to change in organizations and offer an alternative perspective.FindingsSystems theorists have addressed change, and its necessity in organizational survival, using an open systems model. The open systems theory posits that organizations are social systems that have purposes of their own and is made of parts (employees) that are purposeful and operate within a purposeful larger system – the environment (stakeholders). Change that ignores a key part – employees – will be resisted.Originality/valueUsing the systems theory, the authors propose several suggestions for organizational leaders and managers to implement sustainable change. These include, among others, recommendations on circular organizational designs, the need for more democratic organizations, purposeful leadership styles and how to include employees in proactive organizational change processes.
European Business Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 10, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.