Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
V. García-Morales, F. Matías‐Reche, N. Hurtado‐Torres (2008)
Influence of transformational leadership on organizational innovation and performance depending on the level of organizational learning in the pharmaceutical sectorJournal of Organizational Change Management, 21
A. Eagly, Mary Johannesen-Schmidt, M. Engen (2003)
Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men.Psychological bulletin, 129 4
H. Simon (1991)
Bounded Rationality and Organizational LearningOrganization Science, 2
P. Senge
The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization
(1990)
The Art and Practice of the Learning
B. Bass, B. Avolio
Manual: The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire
B. Bass, B. Avolio (2011)
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire
Yair Berson, Louise Nemanich, D. Waldman, Benjamin Galvin, R. Keller (2006)
Leadership and organizational learning: A multiple levels perspectiveLeadership Quarterly, 17
J. Carroll, A. Edmondson (2002)
Leading organisational learning in health careQuality and Safety in Health Care, 11
Hideo Ikehara (1999)
Implications of gestalt theory and practice for the learning organisationThe Learning Organization, 6
P. Losty (1965)
A Behavioural Theory of the FirmJournal of the Operational Research Society, 16
B. Bass (1985)
LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS
K. Weick (1991)
The Nontraditional Quality of Organizational LearningOrganization Science, 2
A. Eagly, Mary Johannesen-Schmidt, M. Engen, A. Konrad (2012)
Transformational, transactional and laissez-faire styles : A meta-analysis comparing women and men
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how leadership has the capacity to both positively influence learning processes and negatively inhibit organizational learning. Design/methodology/approach – This is a conceptual paper that brings together an analysis of leadership and organizational learning literature. The argument is centered on transformational leadership and the responsibility for creating an organizational learning culture. Findings – There is a conventional belief that leaders have solitary control and influence when it comes to setting up organizational learning processes. However, a top‐down approach to facilitate and implement learning in organizations is not always an effective method because learning should be a collaborative practice. Thus, to rely fully on leaders to initiate and sustain the learning processes can be counter‐productive. Practical implications – Good and effective leadership is the key to organizational learning. Learning is the only sustainable method of achieving competitive advantage for contemporary organizations because of rapidly changing environmental forces. Corporations with aspirations for long‐term survival must facilitate, through their leadership, “the impulse to learn” amongst their members. Originality/value – Knowledge is lacking in the area where leadership is linked to learning. Such knowledge is important because leaders play a central role in the learning framework and leaders also offer the required guidance for organizations to integrate and sustain learning processes through policy and practice.
Development and Learning in Organizations – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 28, 2011
Keywords: Leadership; Workplace training; Transformational leadership
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.