Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Land value capture mechanisms in Hong Kong and Singapore A comparative analysis

Land value capture mechanisms in Hong Kong and Singapore A comparative analysis Hong Kong and Singapore are characterized by rapid economic development and a high population density of 6,250 and 6,055 per km 2 land respectively. Land revenue is their major source of income to finance their public infrastructure and social services. Their design and collection of taxes on land, their value‐capture instruments and their allocation of revenue for public works are examined. The article finds that there are some similarities between the two cities in capturing land value, such as the collection of annual rates and stamp duty on property. The differences include the adoption of property tax surcharge and the development charge. In fact, each mechanism has its pros and cons. The method and the extent of each mechanism depend on the goals of the government in respect of the social and economic conditions. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Property Investment & Finance Emerald Publishing

Land value capture mechanisms in Hong Kong and Singapore A comparative analysis

Download PDF
25 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/land-value-capture-mechanisms-in-hong-kong-and-singapore-a-comparative-KvKl5zMCmI
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1463-578X
DOI
10.1108/14635780410525153
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Hong Kong and Singapore are characterized by rapid economic development and a high population density of 6,250 and 6,055 per km 2 land respectively. Land revenue is their major source of income to finance their public infrastructure and social services. Their design and collection of taxes on land, their value‐capture instruments and their allocation of revenue for public works are examined. The article finds that there are some similarities between the two cities in capturing land value, such as the collection of annual rates and stamp duty on property. The differences include the adoption of property tax surcharge and the development charge. In fact, each mechanism has its pros and cons. The method and the extent of each mechanism depend on the goals of the government in respect of the social and economic conditions.

Journal

Journal of Property Investment & Finance – Emerald Publishing

Published: Feb 1, 2004

Keywords: Hong Kong; Singapore; Value analysis; Public revenue

References

  • Reforming Singapore's Tax System for the 21st Century
    Asher, M.G.
  • Assessing betterment under a public premium leasehold system: principles and practice in Canberra
    Bourassa, S.C.; Neutze, M.; Strong, A.L.
  • Land Administration
    Dale, P.F.; McLaughlin, J.D.
  • Best practices for property/land tax and valuation administration in a decentralized system
    Faure, P.M.
  • Rethinking value capture policies for Latin America
    Furtado, F.
  • Annual Report of the Director of Accounting Services and the Accounts of the Government
    Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
  • Accounts of the Government
    Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
  • Real estate in global cities: Singapore and Hong Kong as property states
    Haila, A.
  • The property tax system in Hong Kong
    Hastings, B.; Walters, M.
  • Transaction costs of allocating increased land value under public leasehold systems: Hong Kong
    Hong, Y.H.
  • Myths and realities of public land leasing: Canberra and Hong Kong
    Hong, Y.H.