Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Teppo Felin (2005)
Strategic Organization : A Field in Search of Micro-foundations
N. Holden, Harald Kortzfleisch (2004)
Why cross-cultural knowledge transfer is a form of translation in more ways than you thinkKnowledge and Process Management, 11
R. Daft (1983)
Learning the Craft of Organizational ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 8
M. Minkov, G. Hofstede (2011)
The evolution of Hofstede's doctrineCross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 18
Snejina Michailova, N. Foss (2009)
Knowledge Governance: Themes and Questions
P. Iles, M. Yolles (2002)
International joint ventures, HRM and viable knowledge migrationThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13
P. Iles, M. Yolles (2002)
Across the great divide: HRD, technology translation, and knowledge migration in bridging the knowledge gap between SMEs and UniversitiesHuman Resource Development International, 5
Snejina Michailova (2011)
The “tortuous evolution” of international management research: Critical issues on the way to maturityThunderbird International Business Review, 53
Murray Davis, 内海 透雄, 大秦 一浩 (2016)
A Translation : MURRAY S. DAVIS, That's Interesting! : Towards a Phenomenology of Sociology and a Sociology of Phenomenology
Teppo Felin, J. Spender (2009)
An exchange of ideas about knowledge governance: Seeking first principles in microfoundations
N. Foss, Snejina Michailova (2009)
Knowledge Governance: Processes and Perspectives
N.J. Foss, K. Husted, S. Michailova
Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: levels of analysis, mechanisms, and research directions
M. Hatch, K. Weick (1998)
Introductory Essay : Improvisation As a Mindset for Organizational AnalysisOrganization Science, 9
N. Foss, K. Husted, Snejina Michailova (2010)
Governing Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: Levels of Analysis, Governance Mechanisms, and Research DirectionsOrganizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal
N. Holden, M. Glisby (2010)
Creating Knowledge Advantage: The Tacit Dimensions of International Competition and Cooperation
Teppo Felin, W. Hesterly (2007)
The Knowledge-Based View, Nested Heterogeneity, and New Value Creation: Philosophical Considerations on the Locus of KnowledgeAcademy of Management Review, 32
K. Chudzikowski, G. Fink, W. Mayrhofer (2011)
Knowledge migration, communication and value change in different cultural contexts: an introductionCross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 18
M. Crossan, João Cunha, M. Cunha, Dusya Vera (2002)
Time and Organizational ImprovisationERN: Other IO: Theory (Topic)
L. Argote, P. Ingram (2000)
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMSOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82
K. Weick (1998)
Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis
B. Czarniawska, B. Joerges
Travel of ideas
S. Park, M. Gordon (1996)
PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTStrategic Management Journal, 17
R.M. Grant
Towards a knowledge‐based theory of the firm
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to four commentaries on the original viewpoint entitled “Knowledge transfer between Russian and Western firms: whose absorptive capacity is in question?” ( CPoIB, Vol. 7 No. 3). As a response, the paper reflects on several points put forward in the critique by the four commentators. Design/methodology/approach – The paper engages in a debate and critically reflects on issues regarding knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity in the context of business interactions between Russian and Western firms. Findings – The paper revisits the notions of “knowledge”, “knowledge transfer” and “absorptive capacity” and argues that moving away from a functionalist framework is useful when analyzing these terms in the context of Russian‐Western business settings. The paper also discusses the applicability and relevance of some Soviet management practices in contemporary Russia and in conducting business with Western partners. The role of Russian business schools in reproducing, generating and disseminating knowledge is also discussed. Research limitations/implications – The paper is a continuation of the discussion on issues and questions related to knowledge transfer between Russian and Western firms. It outlines research directions worth pursuing in the future. Practical implications – Western managers are advised to treat knowledge transfer as a two‐way learning process rather than seeing themselves merely as a source of superior knowledge that needs to be transferred to Russian business partners. Russian managers will benefit from understanding the dynamics of knowledge transfer processes and refining their view on absorptive capacity. Originality/value – The paper contributes to the ongoing academic conversation on issues of knowledge transfer between Russian and Western firms. It engages in a critical reflection on issues put forward in the original paper on this topic and on four commentaries, published in this issue of CPoIB .
Critical Perspectives on International Business – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 25, 2011
Keywords: Critical reflection; Debate; Absorptive capacity; Knowledge transfer; Russian companies; Western companies; Russian business schools; Russia; Western Europe; Companies; Business schools
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.