Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity in Russian‐Western business settings Reflection on commentators' critique

Knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity in Russian‐Western business settings Reflection on... Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to four commentaries on the original viewpoint entitled “Knowledge transfer between Russian and Western firms: whose absorptive capacity is in question?” ( CPoIB, Vol. 7 No. 3). As a response, the paper reflects on several points put forward in the critique by the four commentators. Design/methodology/approach – The paper engages in a debate and critically reflects on issues regarding knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity in the context of business interactions between Russian and Western firms. Findings – The paper revisits the notions of “knowledge”, “knowledge transfer” and “absorptive capacity” and argues that moving away from a functionalist framework is useful when analyzing these terms in the context of Russian‐Western business settings. The paper also discusses the applicability and relevance of some Soviet management practices in contemporary Russia and in conducting business with Western partners. The role of Russian business schools in reproducing, generating and disseminating knowledge is also discussed. Research limitations/implications – The paper is a continuation of the discussion on issues and questions related to knowledge transfer between Russian and Western firms. It outlines research directions worth pursuing in the future. Practical implications – Western managers are advised to treat knowledge transfer as a two‐way learning process rather than seeing themselves merely as a source of superior knowledge that needs to be transferred to Russian business partners. Russian managers will benefit from understanding the dynamics of knowledge transfer processes and refining their view on absorptive capacity. Originality/value – The paper contributes to the ongoing academic conversation on issues of knowledge transfer between Russian and Western firms. It engages in a critical reflection on issues put forward in the original paper on this topic and on four commentaries, published in this issue of CPoIB . http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png critical perspectives on international business Emerald Publishing

Knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity in Russian‐Western business settings Reflection on commentators' critique

Download PDF
8 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/knowledge-transfer-and-absorptive-capacity-in-russian-western-business-d6VuQk5qkU
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1742-2043
DOI
10.1108/17422041111180818
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to four commentaries on the original viewpoint entitled “Knowledge transfer between Russian and Western firms: whose absorptive capacity is in question?” ( CPoIB, Vol. 7 No. 3). As a response, the paper reflects on several points put forward in the critique by the four commentators. Design/methodology/approach – The paper engages in a debate and critically reflects on issues regarding knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity in the context of business interactions between Russian and Western firms. Findings – The paper revisits the notions of “knowledge”, “knowledge transfer” and “absorptive capacity” and argues that moving away from a functionalist framework is useful when analyzing these terms in the context of Russian‐Western business settings. The paper also discusses the applicability and relevance of some Soviet management practices in contemporary Russia and in conducting business with Western partners. The role of Russian business schools in reproducing, generating and disseminating knowledge is also discussed. Research limitations/implications – The paper is a continuation of the discussion on issues and questions related to knowledge transfer between Russian and Western firms. It outlines research directions worth pursuing in the future. Practical implications – Western managers are advised to treat knowledge transfer as a two‐way learning process rather than seeing themselves merely as a source of superior knowledge that needs to be transferred to Russian business partners. Russian managers will benefit from understanding the dynamics of knowledge transfer processes and refining their view on absorptive capacity. Originality/value – The paper contributes to the ongoing academic conversation on issues of knowledge transfer between Russian and Western firms. It engages in a critical reflection on issues put forward in the original paper on this topic and on four commentaries, published in this issue of CPoIB .

Journal

critical perspectives on international business – Emerald Publishing

Published: Oct 25, 2011

Keywords: Critical reflection; Debate; Absorptive capacity; Knowledge transfer; Russian companies; Western companies; Russian business schools; Russia; Western Europe; Companies; Business schools

References

  • Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms
    Argote, L.; Ingram, P.
  • Time and organizational improvisation
    Crossan, M.; Cunha, M.P.; Vera, D.; Cunha, J.D.
  • Travel of ideas
    Czarniawska, B.; Joerges, B.
  • Knowledge migration, communication and value change in different cultural contexts: an introduction
    Czudzikowski, K.; Fink, G.; Mayrhofer, W.
  • Learning the craft of organizational research
    Daft, R.L.
  • Strategic organization: a field in search of micro‐foundations
    Felin, T.; Foss, N.J.
  • The knowledge‐based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge
    Felin, T.; Hesterly, W.S.
  • An exchange of ideas about knowledge governance: seeking first principles and microfoundations
    Felin, T.; Spender, J.‐C.
  • Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: levels of analysis, mechanisms, and research directions
    Foss, N.J.; Husted, K.; Michailova, S.
  • Towards a knowledge‐based theory of the firm
    Grant, R.M.
  • Creating Knowledge Advantage: The Tacit Dimensions of International Competition and Cooperation
    Holden, N.J.; Glisby, M.
  • Why cross‐cultural knowledge transfer is a form of translation in more ways than you think
    Holden, N.J.; Von Kortzfleisch, H.F.O.
  • Across the great divide: HRD, technology translation, and knowledge migration in bridging the knowledge gap between SMEs and universities
    Iles, P.; Yolles, M.
  • The ‘tortuous evolution’ of international management research: critical issues on the way to maturity
    Michailova, S.
  • Knowledge governance: themes and questions
    Michailova, S.; Foss, N.J.
  • Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis
    Weick, K.E.
  • International joint ventures, HRM and viable knowledge migration
    Yolles, M.