Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Knowledge‐sharing enablers and barriers in pharmaceutical research and development

Knowledge‐sharing enablers and barriers in pharmaceutical research and development Purpose – Because selling innovative products is crucial to its livelihood, the pharmaceutical industry has a fundamental need to share knowledge to stimulate the process of knowledge creation. This study seeks to explore knowledge‐sharing enablers and barriers in pharmaceutical R&D. Design/methodology/approach – A case study was carried out in a pharmaceutical company in Denmark. R&D professionals were asked to identify organizational enablers and barriers to knowledge sharing. Their accounts were processed as text during workshops. Data were condensed thematically. The analysis was combined with the conceptualization of tacit and explicit knowledge as proposed by Nonaka and Takeuchi. Findings – The research shows that R&D professionals have different views and practices regarding engaging in knowledge sharing. This reveals that knowledge sharing is multi‐faceted and that one standard for R&D professionals does not exist. The enablers identified recognized the use of tacit knowledge. The existence of enablers and barriers with oppositional influence on knowledge‐sharing practices is evident. Furthermore, synergy is identified in the knowledge‐sharing enablers provided that the settings fostering personal closeness to colleagues are stimulated. Physical proximity to colleagues therefore has obvious influence on knowledge‐sharing practices. Research limitations/implications – This study was based on a single case study. The extent to which the findings can be generalized to other industries is unknown. Practical implications – The findings have implications for R&D managers who must be aware of these professional diversities in order to enhance knowledge‐sharing practices. Attention should also be given to the synergies hidden in knowledge‐sharing enablers. Originality/value – Focused implementation of enablers will increase knowledge‐sharing practices and minimize barriers. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Knowledge Management Emerald Publishing

Knowledge‐sharing enablers and barriers in pharmaceutical research and development

Download PDF
18 pages
Read Article

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/knowledge-sharing-enablers-and-barriers-in-pharmaceutical-research-and-0vvDqSWMth
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1367-3270
DOI
10.1108/13673271111108693
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – Because selling innovative products is crucial to its livelihood, the pharmaceutical industry has a fundamental need to share knowledge to stimulate the process of knowledge creation. This study seeks to explore knowledge‐sharing enablers and barriers in pharmaceutical R&D. Design/methodology/approach – A case study was carried out in a pharmaceutical company in Denmark. R&D professionals were asked to identify organizational enablers and barriers to knowledge sharing. Their accounts were processed as text during workshops. Data were condensed thematically. The analysis was combined with the conceptualization of tacit and explicit knowledge as proposed by Nonaka and Takeuchi. Findings – The research shows that R&D professionals have different views and practices regarding engaging in knowledge sharing. This reveals that knowledge sharing is multi‐faceted and that one standard for R&D professionals does not exist. The enablers identified recognized the use of tacit knowledge. The existence of enablers and barriers with oppositional influence on knowledge‐sharing practices is evident. Furthermore, synergy is identified in the knowledge‐sharing enablers provided that the settings fostering personal closeness to colleagues are stimulated. Physical proximity to colleagues therefore has obvious influence on knowledge‐sharing practices. Research limitations/implications – This study was based on a single case study. The extent to which the findings can be generalized to other industries is unknown. Practical implications – The findings have implications for R&D managers who must be aware of these professional diversities in order to enhance knowledge‐sharing practices. Attention should also be given to the synergies hidden in knowledge‐sharing enablers. Originality/value – Focused implementation of enablers will increase knowledge‐sharing practices and minimize barriers.

Journal

Journal of Knowledge Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Feb 22, 2011

Keywords: Knowledge management; Pharmaceuticals industry; Research and development; Case studies; Quality; Research

References

  • Social capital: prospects for a new concept
    Adler, P.S.; Kwon, S‐W.
  • Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge‐sharing networks
    Albrams, L.C.; Cross, R.; Lesser, E.; Levin, D.Z.
  • Knowledge Work and Knowledge‐Intensive Firms
    Alvesson, M.
  • Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of organizational reward systems
    Bartol, K.M.; Srivastava, A.
  • Knowledge sharing mechanisms in industrial research
    Berends, H.; Van der Bij, H.; Debackere, K.; Weggeman, M.
  • Why is knowledge management so difficult?
    Birkenshaw, J.
  • A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks
    Borgatti, S.; Cross, R.
  • Impact of office layout on communication in a science‐driven business
    Boutellier, R.; Ullman, F.; Schreiber, J.; Naef, R.
  • Knowledge effectiveness, social context and innovation
    Brachos, D.; Kostopoulos, K.; Sonderquist, K.E.; Prastacos, G.
  • Knowledge sharing dilemmas
    Cabrera, Á.; Cabrera, E.F.
  • Internal knowledge generation: the research laboratory and innovative productivity in the pharmaceutical industry
    Cardinal, L.B.; Hatfield, D.E.
  • Competent jerks, lovable fools, and the formation of social network
    Casciaro, T.; Lobo, M.S.
  • The effects of joint reward system in new product development
    Chang, T.J.; Yeh, S.P.; Yeh, I‐J.
  • Knowledge creation: absorptive capacity, organizational mechanisms, and knowledge storage/retrieval capacities
    Chou, S‐W.
  • The qualitative research interview
    Christensen, U.; Schmidt, L.; Dyhr, L.
  • Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation
    Cohen, W.M.; Levinthal, D.A.
  • Knowledge creation in small manufacturing firms during product innovation: an empirical analysis of cause‐effect relationships among its determinants
    Corti, E.; Lo Storto, C.
  • Human resource management and knowledge management: enhancing knowledge sharing in a pharmaceutical company
    Currie, G.; Kerrin, M.
  • Working Knowledge. How Organizations Manage What they Know
    Davenport, T.H.; Prusak, L.
  • Why We Do What We Do: The Dynamics of Personal Autonomy
    Deci, E.L.; Flaste, R.
  • Linking intrinsic motivation, risk taking, and employee creativity in an R&D environment
    Dewett, T.
  • Structures of Social Life
    Fiske, A.P.
  • Global pharmaceutical industry: intellectual wealth and asset protection
    Ganguli, P.
  • Flaws in the ‘engine’ of knowledge creation
    Gourlay, S.; Nurse, A.
  • Towards a knowledge‐based theory of the firm
    Grant, R.M.
  • Virtualness and knowledge in teams: managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology
    Griffith, T.L.; Sawyer, J.E.; Neale, M.A.
  • Knowledge management's social dimension: lessons from Nucor Steel
    Gupta, A.K.; Govindarajan, V.
  • What is your strategy for managing knowledge?
    Hansen, M.T.; Nohria, N.; Tierney, T.
  • Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing
    Hendriks, P.
  • Analyzing Documentary Accounts
    Hodson, R.
  • Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry
    Horrobin, D.F.
  • Autarkic drug discovery in Japanese pharmaceutical companies: insights into national differences in industrial innovation
    Kneller, R.
  • Interviews. An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing
    Kvale, S.
  • The effectiveness of different mechanisms for integrating marketing and R&D
    Leenders, M.A.A.M.; Wierenga, B.
  • The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer
    Levin, D.Z.; Cross, R.
  • Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge
    McDermott, R.; O'Dell, C.
  • Barrier impact on organizational learning within complex organizations
    McLaughlin, S.; Paton, R.A.; Macbeth, D.K.
  • Distance in organizations
    Napier, B.J.; Ferris, G.R.
  • Old is gold? The value of temporal exploitation in the creation of new knowledge
    Nerkar, A.
  • Understanding dynamic capabilities through knowledge management
    Nielsen, A.P.
  • A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation
    Nonaka, I.
  • The Knowledge Creating Company
    Nonaka, I.; Takeuchi, H.
  • Novo Nordisk Annual Report 2008, Financial, Social, and Environmental Performance
    Novo Nordisk A/S
  • If only we knew what we know: identification and transfer of internal best practice
    O'Dell, C.; Grayson, J.
  • Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms
    Osterloch, M.; Frey, B.
  • Appropriation, tacit knowledge and hybrid social regimes in biotechnology in Europe
    Poti, B.
  • Recognizing, appreciating and capturing the tacit knowledge of R&D scientists
    Sapienza, A.M.; Lombardino, J.G.
  • Academic versus industry patenting: an in‐depth analysis of what determines patent value
    Sapsalis, E.; van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B.; Navon, R.
  • Knowledge creation in new product development projects
    Schulze, A.; Hoegl, M.
  • Care of the other: knowledge‐creation through care in professional teams
    Styhre, A.; Roth, J.; Ingelgård, A.
  • Heedful interrelating, knowledge sharing, and new drug development
    Styhre, A.; Ollila, S.; Roth, J.; Williamson, D.; Berg, L.
  • Drivers of organizational creativity: a path model of creative climate in pharmaceutical R&D
    Sundgren, M.; Dimenäs, E.; Gustafsson, J‐E.; Selart, M.
  • Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of the best practice within the firm
    Szulanski, G.
  • Sticky Knowledge Barriers to Knowing in the Firm
    Szulanski, G.
  • Relational quality and innovative performance in R&D based science and technology firms
    Thompson, M.; Heron, P.
  • Evolving to reflect the modern industrial life‐science environment
    Tranter, D.
  • Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks
    Tsai, W.; Ghoshal, S.
  • Rational embeddedness learning: the case of bank loan managers and their clients
    Uzzi, B.; Lancaster, R.
  • Committed to share: commitment and CMC use as antecedents of knowledge sharing
    Van den Hoof, B.; de Leeuw van Weenen, F.
  • Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation
    Von Hippel, E.
  • Enabling Knowledge Creation
    Von Krogh, G.; Kazou, I.; Nonaka, I.
  • Case Study Research. Design and Methods
    Yin, R.K.
  • Clustering biotech: a recipe for success? Spatial patterns of growth of biotechnology in Munich, Rhineland and Hamburg
    Zeller, C.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

Try 2 weeks free now

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

or browse the journals available

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$499/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

Sign up
for free
Start 14 day
Free Trial