Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Knowledge management through technology strategy: implications for competitiveness

Knowledge management through technology strategy: implications for competitiveness Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to conceptualize a learning‐based technology strategy along three dimensions: proactive technology posture, process adaptation and experimentation, and collaborative technology sourcing; also to investigate their relationships with plant competitiveness (cost, quality, delivery, flexibility, and innovation). Design/methodology/approach – Hypothesized relationships are tested from three perspectives – direct effects perspective, co‐alignment perspective, and mediation perspective – using structural equation modeling with an international dataset. Findings – Results show that although the three dimensions of learning‐based technology strategy are not individually related to plant competitiveness (direct effects perspective), their co‐alignment strongly impacts plant competitiveness (co‐alignment perspective). Furthermore, this co‐alignment creates an environment in which employee suggestion and feedback can help make sense of novel situations, leading to superior plant competitiveness (mediation perspective). Practical implications – Many plants develop some aspects of a learning‐based technology strategy while paying little or no attention to the rest. As the findings of the present study show, such an approach will contribute very little to achieving competitive advantage in the marketplace. More specifically, it is shown that three dimensions of learning‐based technology strategy, when used together, have a significant effect on plant competitiveness. Additionally, it is shown that employee suggestions for improvements drive a learning‐based approach to technology strategy. Therefore, managers should adopt a comprehensive approach to technology strategy using all three dimensions and engage their employees in the process of technology development and improvement. Originality/value – The literature has stressed the need for proactive technology posture, process adaptation and experimentation, and collaborative technology sourcing to gain competitive advantage. However, little is known about their mutual interdependence and their combined impact on plant competitiveness. This paper attempts to fill in this gap in the literature. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management Emerald Publishing

Knowledge management through technology strategy: implications for competitiveness

Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/knowledge-management-through-technology-strategy-implications-for-1xaSmUpuV5
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1741-038X
DOI
10.1108/17410381111099789
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to conceptualize a learning‐based technology strategy along three dimensions: proactive technology posture, process adaptation and experimentation, and collaborative technology sourcing; also to investigate their relationships with plant competitiveness (cost, quality, delivery, flexibility, and innovation). Design/methodology/approach – Hypothesized relationships are tested from three perspectives – direct effects perspective, co‐alignment perspective, and mediation perspective – using structural equation modeling with an international dataset. Findings – Results show that although the three dimensions of learning‐based technology strategy are not individually related to plant competitiveness (direct effects perspective), their co‐alignment strongly impacts plant competitiveness (co‐alignment perspective). Furthermore, this co‐alignment creates an environment in which employee suggestion and feedback can help make sense of novel situations, leading to superior plant competitiveness (mediation perspective). Practical implications – Many plants develop some aspects of a learning‐based technology strategy while paying little or no attention to the rest. As the findings of the present study show, such an approach will contribute very little to achieving competitive advantage in the marketplace. More specifically, it is shown that three dimensions of learning‐based technology strategy, when used together, have a significant effect on plant competitiveness. Additionally, it is shown that employee suggestions for improvements drive a learning‐based approach to technology strategy. Therefore, managers should adopt a comprehensive approach to technology strategy using all three dimensions and engage their employees in the process of technology development and improvement. Originality/value – The literature has stressed the need for proactive technology posture, process adaptation and experimentation, and collaborative technology sourcing to gain competitive advantage. However, little is known about their mutual interdependence and their combined impact on plant competitiveness. This paper attempts to fill in this gap in the literature.

Journal

Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Dec 21, 2010

Keywords: Plant efficiency; Operations management; Knowledge management; Tacit knowledge; Explicit knowledge; Competitive strategy

References

  • Structural equation modeling in practice. a review and recommended two‐step approach
    Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W.
  • People: the human side of systems technology
    Averett, P.
  • Choosing successful technology development partners: a best‐practice model
    Bailey, W.J.; Masson, R.; Raeside, R.
  • Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
    Barney, J.
  • Comparative fit indexes in structural models
    Bentler, P.M.
  • Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures
    Bentler, P.M.; Bonett, D.G.
  • The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge
    Berger, P.L.; Luckmann, T.
  • Measuring and managing technological knowledge
    Bohn, R.E.
  • Technology management: a knowledge ecology perspective
    Bowonder, B.; Miyake, T.
  • Measurement issues in empirical research: improving measures of operations strategy and advanced manufacturing technology
    Boyer, K.K.; Pagell, M.
  • Alternative ways of assessing model fit
    Browne, M.W.; Cudeck, R.
  • Manufacturing flexibility and manufacturing proactiveness: empirical evidence from the motherboard industry
    Chang, S.C.; Lin, R.J.; Chen, J.H.; Huang, L.H.
  • Beating Murphy's Law
    Chew, W.B.; Leonard‐Barton, D.; Bohn, R.E.
  • Method and psychological effects on learning behaviors and knowledge creation in quality improvement projects
    Choo, A.S.; Linderman, K.W.; Schroeder, R.G.
  • A Behavioral Theory of the Firm
    Cyert, R.M.; March, J.G.
  • Towards a model of organizations as interpretation systems
    Daft, R.L.; Weick, K.E.
  • The dynamics of technology strategy: an exploratory study
    Davenport, S.; Campbell‐Hunt, C.; Solomon, J.
  • Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy
    Day, G.S.; Reibstein, D.J.; Gunther, R.E.
  • Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices
    Ding, L.; Velicer, W.F.; Harlow, L.L.
  • Dynamic capabilities: what are they?
    Eisenhardt, K.M.; Martin, J.A.
  • Empirical research methods in operations management
    Flynn, B.B.; Sakakibara, S.; Schroeder, R.G.; Bates, K.A.; Flynn, J.E.
  • Develop your technology strategy
    Ford, D.
  • Advanced manufacturing technology adoption: an integrated approach
    Gouvea da Costa, S.E.; Pinheiro de Lima, E.
  • Appropriate manufacturing technology: a strategic approach
    Grant, R.M.; Krishnan, R.; Shani, A.B.; Baer, R.
  • Auditing technology management processes
    Gregory, M.J.; Probert, D.R.; Cowell, D.R.
  • Multivariate Data Analysis
    Hair, J.F.; Anderson, R.E.; Tathum, R.L.; Black, W.C.
  • Process innovation and learning by doing in semiconductor manufacturing
    Hatch, N.W.; Mowery, D.C.
  • The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation
    Hill, C.W.L.; Rothaermel, F.T.
  • How the incumbent can win: managing technological transitions in the semiconductor industry
    Iansiti, M.
  • Testing a model of pull production: a paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling
    Koufteros, X.A.
  • An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation
    Lant, T.; Mezias, S.
  • Creating and transferring knowledge for productivity improvement in factories
    Lapré, M.A.; van Wassenhove, L.N.
  • The factory as a learning laboratory
    Leonard‐Barton, D.
  • The myopia of learning
    Levinthal, D.A.; March, J.G.
  • Performance implications of strategy‐technology connections: an empirical examination
    Liu, H.; Barrar, P.
  • Knowledge driven quality improvement
    Mukherjee, A.S.; Lapré, M.A.; van Wassenhove, L.N.
  • Resources, absorptive capacity, and technology sourcing
    Ouyang, H.
  • Strategic manufacturing planning systems and their linkage to planning system success
    Papke‐Shields, K.; Malhotra, M.K.; Grover, V.
  • Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: the moderating role of absorptive capacity
    Rothaermel, F.T.; Alexandre, M.T.
  • The knowledge factory for accelerated learning practices
    Roth, A.V.; Marucheck, A.S.; Kemp, A.; Trimble, D.
  • High Performance Manufacturing: Global Perspectives
    Schroeder, R.G.; Flynn, B.B.
  • Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling
    Schumacker, R.E.; Lomax, R.G.
  • Applied Multivariate Techniques
    Sharma, S.
  • Technological knowledge maturity, innovation and productivity
    Skilton, P.F.; Dooley, K.
  • Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy
    Teece, D.J.
  • Dynamic capabilities and strategic management
    Teece, D.J.; Pisano, G.; Shuen, A.
  • Exploiting opportunities for technological improvement in organizations
    Tyre, M.J.; Orlikowski, W.J.
  • Alternative methods of learning and process improvement in manufacturing
    Upton, D.M.; Kim, B.
  • The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondence
    Venkatraman, N.
  • Strategic technology partnering in high‐velocity environments – lessons from a case study
    Vilkamo, T.; Keil, T.
  • Technology as equivoque
    Weick, K.E.
  • Sensemaking in Organizations
    Weick, K.E.
  • Exploiting the dynamic links between competitive and technology strategies
    Zahra, S.; Sisodia, R.; Matherne, B.