Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Joaquín Azagra-Caro, P. Mattsson, François Perruchas (2011)
Smoothing the lies: The distinctive effects of patent characteristics on examiner and applicant citationsJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 62
Nees Eck, L. Waltman (2017)
Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewerScientometrics, 111
Jiang MingJi, Zhouzheng Ping (2014)
Research on the Patent Innovation Performance of University–Industry Collaboration Based on Complex Network AnalysisJournal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 21
Torben Schubert (2011)
Assessing the value of patent portfolios: an international country comparisonScientometrics, 88
Valentina Tartari, Stefano Breschi (2012)
Set Them Free: Scientists' Evaluations of the Benefits and Costs of University-Industry Research Collaboration
Diana Boehm, Teresa Hogan (2013)
Science-to-Business collaborations: A science-to-business marketing perspective on scientific knowledge commercializationIndustrial Marketing Management, 42
Research Policy, 42
Satoshi Yasukawa, Shingo Kano (2014)
Validating the usefulness of examiners’ forward citations from the viewpoint of applicants’ self-selection during the patent application procedureScientometrics, 99
A. Giunta, F. Pericoli, E. Pierucci (2016)
University–Industry collaboration in the biopharmaceuticals: the Italian caseThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 41
Juan Alcácer, M. Gittelman, B. Sampat (2008)
Applicant and Examiner Citations in US Patents: An Overview and AnalysisIO: Productivity
Nabeel Al-Yateem, R. Rossiter, W. Robb, S. Slewa-Younan (2018)
Mental health literacy of school nurses in the United Arab EmiratesInternational Journal of Mental Health Systems, 12
Research Policy, 37
Jae Gwak, S. Sohn (2017)
Identifying the trends in wound-healing patents for successful investment strategiesPLoS ONE, 12
Stuart Graham, Alan Marco, Amanda Myers (2015)
Monetizing Marks: Insights from the USPTO Trademark Assignment DatasetWiley-Blackwell: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
H. Etzkowitz, L. Leydesdorff (2000)
The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and
J. Suzuki (2011)
Structural modeling of the value of patentResearch Policy, 40
Hiroyuki Okamuro, J. Nishimura (2013)
Impact of university intellectual property policy on the performance of university-industry research collaborationThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 38
I. Lai, Tun-Wei Lu (2016)
How to improve the university–industry collaboration in Taiwan's animation industry? Academic vs. industrial perspectivesTechnology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28
F. Calzonetti, N. Reid (2013)
The Role of Universities in Supporting New Technology Industries through Commercialization Spin-off Activities (JSRSAI Golden Anniversary Issue : Academic Knowledge Commercialization, Universities and Regional Economic Development) -- (University Engagement Versus Knowledge Commercialization), 43
Antoine Dechezleprêtre, Yann Ménière, Myra Mohnen (2017)
International patent families: from application strategies to statistical indicatorsScientometrics, 111
Ming Li, Xiangdong Chen, Gupeng Zhang (2017)
How does firm size affect technology licensing? Empirical evidence from ChinaScientometrics, 112
D. Mowery (2011)
Learning from one another? International policy “emulation” and university–industry technology transferIndustrial and Corporate Change, 20
Chi Chen, W. Fang, Shiuh-Sheng Hsu (2016)
A study on technological trajectory of light emitting diode in Taiwan by using patent dataInt. J. Technol. Manag., 72
Satoshi Yasukawa, Shingo Kano (2015)
Comparison of examiners’ forward citations in the United States and Japan with pairs of equivalent patent applicationsScientometrics, 102
Sanghoon Lee, Wonjoon Kim, Hakyeon Lee, Jeonghwan Jeon (2016)
Identifying the structure of knowledge networks in the US mobile ecosystems: patent citation analysisTechnology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28
P. Criscuolo, Bart Verspagen
Merit-infonomics Research Memorandum Series Does It Matter Where Patent Citations Come From? Inventor versus Examiner Citations in European Patents Does It Matter Where Patent Citations Come From? Inventor versus Examiner Citations in European Patents
Industrial and Corporate Change, 21
D. Lee, I. Seo, Hochull Choe, Hee Kim (2012)
Collaboration network patterns and research performance: the case of Korean public research institutionsScientometrics, 91
Research Policy, 37
D. Hegde, B. Sampat (2009)
Examiner Citations, Applicant Citations, and the Private Value of PatentsEwing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series
Research Policy, 42
James Bessen (2006)
The Value of U.S. Patents by Owner and Patent CharacteristicsBoston University Law & Economics Research Paper Series
M. Trajtenberg (1990)
A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of InnovationsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 21
J. Calvert, P. Patel (2003)
University-industry research collaborations in the UK: Bibliometric trendsScience and Public Policy, 30
D. Mowery, R. Nelson, B. Sampat, Arvids Ziedonis (2001)
The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980Research Policy, 30
Research Policy, 45
M. Meyer, P. Tang (2007)
Exploring the “value” of academic patents: IP management practices in UK universities and their implications for Third-Stream indicatorsScientometrics, 70
Corinne Langinier, Philippe Marcoul (2016)
The Search of Prior Art and the Revelation of Information by Patent ApplicantsReview of Industrial Organization, 49
T. Ryu, Yoo-Jin Han (2012)
Indicator for Evaluating National Patent Performance: Comparative Analysis among the 30 OECD Countries
(2002)
Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing
Joaquín Azagra-Caro, D. Barberá-Tomás, M. Edwards-Schachter, E. Tur (2017)
Dynamic interactions between university-industry knowledge transfer channels: A case study of the most highly cited academic patentResearch Policy, 46
Yuandi Wang, Jiashun Huang, Yantai Chen, Xiongfeng Pan, Jin Chen (2013)
Have Chinese universities embraced their third mission? New insight from a business perspectiveScientometrics, 97
W. Dolfsma, L. Leydesdorff (2011)
Innovation systems as patent networks: The Netherlands, India and nanotechInnovation, 13
OECD (2012)
10.1787/9789264167407-en
Joshua Powers, P. McDougall (2005)
University Start-Up Formation and Technology Licensing with Firms that Go Public: A Resource-Based View of Academic EntrepreneurshipJournal of Business Venturing, 20
Grace Chen, Jiancheng Guan (2016)
The Core‐Peripheral Structure of International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citation DataStrategy & Microeconomic Policy eJournal
Sungjoon Lee, Moon-soo Kim (2010)
Inter-technology networks to support innovation strategy: An analysis of Korea’s new growth enginesInnovation, 12
Mariko Sakakibara (2009)
An Empirical Analysis of Pricing in Patent Licensing ContractsExperimental & Empirical Studies eJournal
Florian Köhler (2011)
Patent cross-licensing, the influence of IP interdependency and the moderating effect of firm sizeThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 36
Ray-Yun Chang, Yan-Shu Lin, Jin-Li Hu (2015)
Mixed Competition and Patent LicensingERN: Auctions
P. Zuniga (2011)
The state of patenting at research institutions in developing countries: policy approaches and practices
Hui-Yun Sung, Hsi-Yin Yeh, Jin-Kwan Lin, Ssu-Han Chen (2017)
A visualization tool of patent topic evolution using a growing cell structure neural networkScientometrics, 111
Industrial and Corporate Change, 19
Hochull Choe, D. Lee (2017)
The structure and change of the research collaboration network in Korea (2000–2011): network analysis of joint patentsScientometrics, 111
S. Borgatti (2006)
Identifying sets of key players in a social networkComputational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 12
D. Czarnitzki, Thorsten Doherr, K. Hussinger, Paula Schliessler, Andrew Toole (2016)
Knowledge Creates Markets: The Influence of Entrepreneurial Support and Patent Rights on Academic EntrepreneurshipIO: Productivity
P. Thompson (2006)
Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from Inventor- and Examiner-added CitationsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 88
C. Cotropia, Mark Lemley, B. Sampat (2012)
Do Applicant Patent Citations Matter?Cyberspace Law eJournal
Research Policy, 38
Jennifer Chen, Show-Ling Jang, Chiao-Hui Chang (2013)
The patterns and propensity for international co-invention: the case of ChinaScientometrics, 94
Chulhyun Kim, Jeonghwan Jeon, Moon-soo Kim (2015)
Identification and Management of opportunities for technology-based services: a patent-based portfolio approachInnovation, 17
Gene Slowinski, Darin Latimer, S. Mehlman (2013)
Dealing with Shortages of Critical Materials: Concerned about Growing Supply Uncertainties, Firms Are Taking Various Actions to Anticipate and Plan for Critical Materials ShortagesResearch-technology Management, 56
Scott Bass, Lukasz Kurgan (2010)
Discovery of factors influencing patent value based on machine learning in patents in the field of nanotechnologyScientometrics, 82
International Journal of Technology Management, 72
W. Haiyan, Zhou Yuan (2009)
University-owned enterprises as entry point to the knowledge economy in ChinaScience and Public Policy, 36
Anthony Breitzman, P. Thomas (2015)
Inventor team size as a predictor of the future citation impact of patentsScientometrics, 103
Jean-François Sattin (2016)
Exploring the survival of patent licensing: some evidence from French foreign agreementsThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 41
J. Heywood, Guangliang Ye (2011)
Patent licensing in a model of spatial price discrimination, 90
Dong-hyu Kim, Heejin Lee, J. Kwak (2017)
Standards as a driving force that influences emerging technological trajectories in the converging world of the Internet and things: An investigation of the M2M/IoT patent networkResearch Policy, 46
Masashi Shirabe (2014)
Identifying SCI covered publications within non-patent references in U.S. utility patentsScientometrics, 101
J. Huenteler, Jan Ossenbrink, T. Schmidt, V. Hoffmann (2014)
How a Product's Design Hierarchy Shapes the Evolution of Technological Knowledge – Evidence from Patent-Citation Networks in Wind PowerO&M: Structures & Processes in Organizations eJournal
F. Zhang, X. Zhang (2014)
Patent activity analysis of vibration-reduction control technology in high-speed railway vehicle systems in ChinaScientometrics, 100
Inchae Park, Yujin Jeong, B. Yoon (2017)
Analyzing the value of technology based on the differences of patent citations between applicants and examinersScientometrics, 111
Joshua Powers (2003)
Commercializing Academic Research: Resource Effects on Performance of University Technology TransferThe Journal of Higher Education, 74
Rainer Frietsch, Peter Neuhäusler, Taehyun Jung, B. Looy (2014)
Patent indicators for macroeconomic growth—the value of patents estimated by export volumeTechnovation, 34
Jurriën Bakker (2017)
The log-linear relation between patent citations and patent valueScientometrics, 110
Industrial and Corporate Change, 24
Hyun Park, Jay Kang (2009)
Patterns of scientific and technological knowledge flows based on scientific papers and patentsScientometrics, 81
Boyan Jovanovic (2009)
The Technology Cycle and InequalityThe Review of Economic Studies, 76
Y. Chandra (2018)
Mapping the evolution of entrepreneurship as a field of research (1990–2013): A scientometric analysisPLoS ONE, 13
Dante Gregorio, S. Shane (2003)
Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?Research Policy, 32
S. Sohn, Mooyeob Lee (2012)
Conjoint analysis of R&D contract agreements for industry-funded university researchThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 37
Maria Odasso, Giuseppe Scellato, E. Ughetto (2013)
Selling Patents at Auction: An Empirical Analysis of Patent ValueInnovation Practice eJournal
S. Torrisi, A. Gambardella, P. Giuri, D. Harhoff, Karin Hoisl, M. Mariani (2016)
Used, Blocking and Sleeping Patents: Empirical Evidence from a Large-Scale Inventor SurveyResearch Policy, 45
M. Feitosa, A. Kraja, D. Chasman, Y. Sung, T. Winkler, I. Ntalla, Xiuqing Guo, N. Franceschini, Ching-Yu Cheng, X. Sim, D. Vojinović, J. Marten, S. Musani, Changwei Li, A. Bentley, Michael Brown, K. Schwander, M. Richard, R. Noordam, H. Aschard, Traci Bartz, L. Bielak, R. Dorajoo, Virginia Fisher, F. Hartwig, A. Horimoto, K. Lohman, A. Manning, T. Rankinen, A. Smith, S. Tajuddin, M. Wojczynski, Maris Alver, M. Boissel, Q. Cai, A. Campbell, Jin-Fang Chai, Xu Chen, J. Divers, Chuan Gao, A. Goel, Y. Hagemeijer, S. Harris, M. He, F. Hsu, A. Jackson, M. Kähönen, A. Kasturiratne, P. Komulainen, Brigitte Kühnel, F. Laguzzi, J. Luan, N. Matoba, I. Nolte, S. Padmanabhan, Muhammad Riaz, R. Rueedi, A. Robino, M. Said, R. Scott, T. Sofer, A. Stančáková, F. Takeuchi, B. Tayo, Peter Most, T. Varga, V. Vitart, Yajuan Wang, E. Ware, H. Warren, S. Weiss, W. Wen, L. Yanek, Weihua Zhang, Jinghua Zhao, S. Afaq, N. Amin, M. Amini, D. Arking, T. Aung, E. Boerwinkle, I. Borecki, U. Broeckel, Morris Brown, M. Brumat, G. Burke, M. Canouil, A. Chakravarti, S. Charumathi, Y. Chen, J. Connell, A. Correa, L. Fuentes, R. Mutsert, H. Silva, Xuan Deng, Jingzhong Ding, Q. Duan, C. Eaton, G. Ehret, R. Eppinga, E. Evangelou, J. Faul, S. Felix, N. Forouhi, T. Forrester, O. Franco, Y. Friedlander, I. Gandin, He Gao, M. Ghanbari, B. Gigante, C. Gu, D. Gu, S. Hagenaars, G. Hallmans, T. Harris, Jiang He, S. Heikkinen, C. Heng, M. Hirata, B. Howard, M. Ikram, U. John, T. Katsuya, C. Khor, T. Kilpeläinen, W. Koh, J. Krieger, S. Kritchevsky, M. Kubo, J. Kuusisto, T. Lakka, C. Langefeld, C. Langenberg, L. Launer, B. Lehne, C. Lewis, Yize Li, Shiow Lin, Jianjun Liu, Jingmin Liu, M. Loh, T. Louie, R. Mägi, C. McKenzie, T. Meitinger, A. Metspalu, Y. Milaneschi, L. Milani, K. Mohlke, Y. Momozawa, M. Nalls, C. Nelson, N. Sotoodehnia, J. Norris, J. O'connell, Nicholette Palmer, T. Perls, N. Pedersen, A. Peters, P. Peyser, N. Poulter, L. Raffel, O. Raitakari, Kathryn Roll, L. Rose, F. Rosendaal, J. Rotter, C. Schmidt, P. Schreiner, N. Schupf, W. Scott, P. Sever, Yuan Shi, S. Sidney, M. Sims, Colleen Sitlani, Jennifer Smith, H. Snieder, J. Starr, K. Strauch, H. Stringham, N. Tan, Hua Tang, K. Taylor, Y. Teo, Yih-Chung Tham, S. Turner, A. Uitterlinden, P. Vollenweider, M. Waldenberger, Lihua Wang, Y. Wang, W. Wei, Christine Williams, J. Yao, Caizheng Yu, Jian-Min Yuan, Wei Zhao, A. Zonderman, D. Becker, M. Boehnke, D. Bowden, J. Chambers, I. Deary, T. Esko, M. Farrall, P. Franks, B. Freedman, P. Froguel, P. Gasparini, C. Gieger, J. Jonas, Y. Kamatani, N. Kato, J. Kooner, Z. Kutalik, M. Laakso, C. Laurie, K. Leander, T. Lehtimäki, Lifelines Study, P. Magnusson, A. Oldehinkel, B. Penninx, O. Polašek, D. Porteous, R. Rauramaa, N. Samani, J. Scott, X. Shu, P. Harst, L. Wagenknecht, N. Wareham, H. Watkins, D. Weir, A. Wickremasinghe, Tangchun Wu, W. Zheng, C. Bouchard, K. Christensen, M. Evans, V. Gudnason, B. Horta, S. Kardia, Yongmei Liu, A. Pereira, B. Psaty, P. Ridker, R. Dam, W. Gauderman, Xiaofeng Zhu, D. Mook-Kanamori, M. Fornage, C. Rotimi, L. Cupples, T. Kelly, E. Fox, C. Hayward, C. Duijn, E. Tai, T. Wong, C. Kooperberg, W. Palmas, K. Rice, A. Morrison, P. Elliott, M. Caulfield, P. Munroe, D. Rao, M. Province, D. Levy (2018)
Novel genetic associations for blood pressure identified via gene-alcohol interaction in up to 570K individuals across multiple ancestriesPLoS ONE, 13
M. Perkmann, Valentina Tartari, M. McKelvey, E. Autio, A. Broström, P. D’Este, R. Fini, A. Geuna, Rosa Grimaldi, A. Hughes, Stefan Krabel, M. Kitson, P. Llerena, Franceso Lissoni, A. Salter, M. Sobrero (2012)
Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry RelationsO&M: Structures & Processes in Organizations eJournal
B. Ponomariov (2013)
Government-sponsored university-industry collaboration and the production of nanotechnology patents in US universitiesThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 38
C. Goetze (2010)
An empirical enquiry into co-patent networks and their stars: The case of cardiac pacemaker technologyTechnovation, 30
Hui-ting Hsieh, Ching‐chong Lai, Kuan-jen Chen (2015)
A Macroeconomic Model of Imperfect Competition with Patent LicensingThe B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 15
L. Leydesdorff, S. Carley, Ismael Rafols (2012)
Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categoriesScientometrics, 94
Sung-Seok Ko, Namuk Ko, Doyeon Kim, Hyunseok Park, Janghyeok Yoon (2014)
Analyzing technology impact networks for R&D planning using patents: combined application of network approachesScientometrics, 101
D. Mah, P. Hills (2014)
Collaborative Governance for Technological Innovation: A Comparative Case Study of Wind Energy in Xinjiang, Shanghai, and GuangdongEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32
T. Sohnesen, A. Ambel, Peter Fisker, Colin Andrews, Q. Khan (2016)
Small area estimation of child undernutrition in Ethiopian woredasPLoS ONE, 12
Nicolò Barbieri (2015)
Investigating the impacts of technological position and European environmental regulation on green automotive patent activityEcological Economics, 117
S. Ankrah, T. Burgess, P. Grimshaw, N. Shaw (2013)
Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer: What single-group studies of motives omitTechnovation, 33
Alessandro Muscio, A. Pozzali (2013)
The effects of cognitive distance in university-industry collaborations: some evidence from Italian universitiesThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 38
Z. Tekic, D. Kukolj (2013)
Threat of Litigation and Patent Value: What Technology Managers Should KnowResearch-Technology Management, 56
S. Zyoud, W. Sweileh, R. Awang, Samah Al-Jabi (2018)
Global trends in research related to social media in psychology: mapping and bibliometric analysisInternational Journal of Mental Health Systems, 12
Grazia Cecere, Nicoletta Corrocher, Cédric Gossart, Muge Ozman (2014)
Technological pervasiveness and variety of innovators in Green ICT: A patent-based analysisResearch Policy, 43
Xia Gao, Xi Guo, Jiancheng Guan (2013)
An analysis of the patenting activities and collaboration among industry-university-research institutes in the Chinese ICT sectorScientometrics, 98
K. Motohashi, Shingo Muramatsu (2012)
Examining the University Industry Collaboration Policy in Japan: Patent analysisTechnology in Society, 34
Rui Li, Tamy Chambers, Ying Ding, Guo Zhang, Liansheng Meng (2014)
Patent citation analysis: Calculating science linkage based on citing motivationJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65
Wei Hong, Yu-Sung Su (2013)
The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university–industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent dataResearch Policy, 42
Maribel Guerrero, D. Urbano (2012)
The development of an entrepreneurial universityThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 37
Juan Alcácer, M. Gittelman (2006)
Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner CitationsThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 88
As the university–industry collaboration (UIC) gradually attracts the attention of various national governments, the number of studies on UIC has increased substantially. Past UIC studies have mostly focused on investigating the incentives and the motivation for UIC, forms of UIC and performance output of UIC. However, they have not actively identified the key technologies and technology distribution that are conductive to the commercialization of UIC outcomes. Therefore, this study aims to adopt the licensed UIC patents as the basis for analysis and to construct a patent licensing technology network.Design/methodology/approachThis study focused on licensed patents because past studies have indicated that such patents usually have higher value. Moreover, patent licensing can be seen as the final step for the commercialization of UIC outcomes. Finally, past studies have rarely explored patent examiners’ views on key technologies. However, during the substantive examination of patents, patent examiners often use their background knowledge regarding the technology to include citations to other patented technologies that they consider valuable or indispensable. Therefore, this study focused on investigating the patents recognized and cited by patent examiners and conducted key technology identification.FindingsThe results indicated that past key technologies in UIC focused on surveying, medicine, biochemistry and electric digital data processing; these fields are crucial to the commercialization of key UIC technologies. Finally, the USA, Japan, Sweden and Germany play critical roles in the network of global university–industry cooperation and technology licensing.Originality/valuePatent examiners’ perspectives were adopted to establish a patent licensing technology network, through which the key technologies that could promote UIC patent licensing were mined. This study can also serve as a reference for resource allocation in university research and development and for governments to promote new technologies.
International Journal of Innovation Science – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 21, 2019
Keywords: Network analysis; University–industry collaboration; Patent examiner; Patent licensing; Patent citation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.