Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
John Yeung, A. Chan, Daniel Chan, Leong-Kwan Li (2007)
Development of a partnering performance index (PPI) for construction projects in Hong Kong: a Delphi studyConstruction Management and Economics, 25
B. Baiden, A. Price, A. Dainty (2006)
The extent of team integration within construction projectsInternational Journal of Project Management, 24
J. Palacios, V. González, L. Alarcón (2014)
Selection of Third Party Relationships in ConstructionJournal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce, 140
S. Cicmil, D. Marshall (2005)
Insights into collaboration at the project level: complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanismsBuilding Research & Information, 33
M. Alshawi, I. Faraj (2002)
Integrated construction environments: technology and implementationConstruction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 2
M. Rahman, M. Kumaraswamy (2004)
Potential for Implementing Relational Contracting and Joint Risk ManagementJournal of Management in Engineering, 20
D. Moore, A. Dainty (1999)
Integrated project teams’ performance in managing unexpected change eventsTeam Performance Management, 5
A. Kadefors (2004)
Trust in project relationships-inside the black boxInternational Journal of Project Management, 22
D. Forgues, L. Koskela (2009)
The influence of a collaborative procurement approach using integrated design in construction on project team performanceInternational Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2
A. Chan (2001)
Time–cost relationship of public sector projects in MalaysiaInternational Journal of Project Management, 19
B. Lloyd-Walker, A. Mills, D. Walker (2014)
Enabling construction innovation: the role of a no-blame culture as a collaboration behavioural driver in project alliancesConstruction Management and Economics, 32
Xianhai Meng (2012)
The effect of relationship management on project performance in constructionInternational Journal of Project Management, 30
D. Walker, K. Hampson, Renaye Peters (2002)
Project alliancing vs project partnering: a case study of the Australian National Museum ProjectSupply Chain Management, 7
James LeBreton, Jenell Senter (2008)
Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater AgreementOrganizational Research Methods, 11
N. Evbuomwan, C. Anumba (1998)
An integrated framework for concurrent life-cycle design and constructionAdvances in Engineering Software, 29
M. Dulaimi, Florence Y.Ling, G. Ofori, N. Silva (2002)
Enhancing integration and innovation in constructionBuilding Research & Information, 30
P. Lahdenperä (2012)
Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project deliveryConstruction Management and Economics, 30
B. Jørgensen, S. Emmitt (2009)
Investigating the integration of design and construction from a “lean” perspectiveConstruction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 9
A. Aapaoja, M. Herrala, Aki Pekuri, H. Haapasalo (2013)
The characteristics of and cornerstones for creating integrated teamsInternational Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6
J. Lindner, T. Murphy, G. Briers (2001)
HANDLING NONRESPONSE IN SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCHJournal of Agricultural Education, 42
D. Arditi, Ahmed Elhassan, Y. Toklu (2002)
Constructability Analysis in the Design FirmJournal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce, 128
C. Ibrahim, S. Costello, S. Wilkinson (2015)
Development of an assessment tool for team integration in alliance projectsInternational Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 8
Philip Lawrence, J. Scanlan (2007)
Planning in the Dark: Why Major Engineering Projects Fail to Achieve Key GoalsTechnology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19
Sinem Mollaoglu-Korkmaz, L. Swarup, D. Riley (2013)
Delivering Sustainable, High-Performance Buildings: Influence of Project Delivery Methods on Integration and Project OutcomesJournal of Management in Engineering, 29
M. Rahman, M. Kumaraswamy, F. Ling (2007)
Building a relational contracting culture and integrated teamsCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 34
J. Guthrie, Chester Spell, R. Nyamori (2002)
Correlates and consequences of high involvement work practices: the role of competitive strategyThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13
M. Rahman, M. Kumaraswamy (2008)
Relational Contracting and Teambuilding: Assessing Potential Contractual and Noncontractual IncentivesJournal of Management in Engineering, 24
Khairil Ibrahim, S. Costello, S. Wilkinson (2013)
Key practice indicators of team integration in construction projects: a reviewTeam Performance Management, 19
M. Asmar, A. Hanna, Chul-Ki Chang (2009)
Monte Carlo Simulation Approach to Support Alliance Team SelectionJournal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce, 135
D. Moore, A. Dainty (2001)
Intra-team boundaries as inhibitors of performance improvement in UK design and build projects: a call for changeConstruction Management and Economics, 19
A. Dainty, S. Millett, G. Briscoe (2001)
New perspectives on construction supply chain integrationSupply Chain Management, 6
Yuming Hong, Daniel Chan, A. Chan, John Yeung (2012)
Critical Analysis of Partnering Research Trend in Construction JournalsJournal of Management in Engineering, 28
M. Kumaraswamy, Aaron Anvuur (2008)
Selecting sustainable teams for PPP projectsBuilding and Environment, 43
J. Bröchner, B. Björk (2008)
Where to submit? Journal choice by construction management authorsConstruction Management and Economics, 26
N. Coviello, Marian Jones (2004)
Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship researchJournal of Business Venturing, 19
David Moore, P. Antill (2001)
Integrated Project Teams: the way forward for UK defence procurementEuropean Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7
J. Armstrong, Terry Overton (1977)
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail SurveysJournal of Marketing Research, 14
D. Walker, B. Lloyd-Walker (2014)
The ambience of a project alliance in Australia, 4
M. Dulaimi, F. Ling, Arun Bajracharya (2003)
Organizational motivation and inter-organizational interaction in construction innovation in SingaporeConstruction Management and Economics, 21
C. Black, A. Akintoye, Eamon Fitzgerald (2000)
An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in constructionInternational Journal of Project Management, 18
P. Love, D. Mistry, P. Davis (2010)
Price Competitive Alliance Projects: Identification of Success Factors for Public ClientsJournal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce, 136
N. El-Gohary, T. El-Diraby (2010)
Dynamic Knowledge-Based Process Integration Portal for Collaborative ConstructionJournal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce, 136
E. Palaneeswaran, M. Kumaraswamy (2000)
Contractor Selection for Design/Build ProjectsJournal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce, 126
Allan Hauck, D. Walker, K. Hampson, Renaye Peters (2004)
Project alliancing at National Museum of Australia : the collaborative process
Chau Wing (1997)
The ranking of construction management journalsConstruction Management and Economics, 15
B. Baiden, A. Price (2011)
The effect of integration on project delivery team effectivenessInternational Journal of Project Management, 29
P. Love, A. Gunasekaran, Heng Li (1998)
Concurrent engineering : a strategy for procuring construction projectsInternational Journal of Project Management, 16
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to validate a list of key indicators (KIs) of team integration identified from construction management literature, identify the most significant KIs and provide suggestions on how to influence team integration, based on the opinion of an established construction peer group in New Zealand. Design/methodology/approach – A literature review was conducted to identify and consolidate a set of KIs of team integration. Subsequently, a set of questions was designed to gain insight and opinion in terms of the significance and ranking of the identified indicators, as well as suggestions on how to influence the integration practice. Findings – Analysis of the survey results showed that all relevant indicators have a strong influence towards determining the success of team integration in construction projects. The top-ranked indicators that contribute towards successful team integration are all relationship orientated as follows; single team focus on goals and objectives, trust and respect, commitment from top management, free flow communication and no blame culture. A framework for influencing these indicators of team integration is proposed which includes four elements: first, team formation; second, contractual model; third, teamwork principle; and fourth, operational monitoring. Research limitations/implications – The findings are limited to practitioners’ perceptions who are registered with an established construction peer group in New Zealand. Practical implications – The results of the study are expected to provide insight for construction practitioners to help them embrace team integration practice and, hence, provide both the opportunity and a platform to enhance and measure their team performance. Originality/value – The paper recognises that while the process of integration is a result of a combination of many indicators, it further extends the team integration literature by providing insights into what are the dominant relationship indicators of team integration, and how to influence these indicators based on a proposed framework.
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 7, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.