Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Wirtz, Jan Weyerer, Franziska Schichtel (2019)
An integrative public IoT framework for smart governmentGov. Inf. Q., 36
Changlin Wang (2014)
Antecedents and consequences of perceived value in Mobile Government continuance use: An empirical research in ChinaComput. Hum. Behav., 34
Parul Gupta, P. Suri (2017)
Measuring public value of e-governance projects in India: citizens’ perspectiveTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11
K.M.G. Lopes (2016)
Fatores direcionadores para a criação de valor público na adoção de serviços eletrônicos pelo cidadão
J. Bertot, Ursula Gorham, P. Jaeger, Lindsay Sarin, Heeyoon Choi (2014)
Big data, open government and e-government: Issues, policies and recommendationsInf. Polity, 19
O. Al-Hujran, M. Al-Debei, A. Chatfield, M. Migdadi (2015)
The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and useComput. Hum. Behav., 53
A. Cordella, C. Bonina (2012)
A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflectionGov. Inf. Q., 29
Kanishka Karunasena, Hepu Deng (2012)
Critical factors for evaluating the public value of e-government in Sri LankaGov. Inf. Q., 29
Tara Sun, R. Medaglia (2019)
Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcareGov. Inf. Q., 36
Svein Ølnes, J. Ubacht, M. Janssen (2017)
Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharingGov. Inf. Q., 34
D. Hilgers, C. Ihl (2010)
Citizensourcing: Applying the Concept of Open Innovation to the Public Sector
Naci Karkin, M. Janssen (2014)
Evaluating websites from a public value perspective: A review of Turkish local government websitesInt. J. Inf. Manag., 34
J. Alford, Owen Hughes (2008)
Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public ManagementThe American Review of Public Administration, 38
Sherry Amstein (1969)
“A Ladder of Citizen Participation”Journal of The American Planning Association, 35
José Gil-García, Jing Zhang, G. Cid (2016)
Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional viewGov. Inf. Q., 33
Teddy Rosady (2018)
STANDARISASI PENGEMBANGAN ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT BERDASARKAN UNPAN (United Nations Online Network in Public Administration and Finance) UNTUK INDONESIA, 2
J. Rose, John Persson, L. Heeager (2015)
How e-Government managers prioritise rival value positions: The efficiency imperativeInf. Polity, 20
J. Salazar (2013)
Entorno político y dependencia financiera de los estados mexicanosGestion Y Politica Publica, 22
S. Osborne, Zoe Radnor, Kirsty Strokosch (2016)
Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment?Public Management Review, 18
Hung-Lian Tang, Sock Chung, Chun Se (2009)
Examining the impact of possible antecedents on service usage: an empirical study on Macao e-governmentElectron. Gov. an Int. J., 6
Gestión y Política Pública, 22
Haitham Alshibly, R. Chiong (2015)
Customer empowerment: Does it influence electronic government success? A citizen-centric perspectiveElectron. Commer. Res. Appl., 14
A. Cordella, Andrea Paletti (2018)
ICTs and value creation in public sector: Manufacturing logic vs service logicInf. Polity, 23
A. Savoldelli, Cristiano Codagnone, Gianluca Misuraca (2014)
Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoptionGov. Inf. Q., 31
José Gil-García, Natalie Helbig, A. Ojo (2014)
Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sectorGov. Inf. Q., 31
José Gil-García, L. Luna-Reyes (2006)
Integrating Conceptual Approaches to E-Government
R. Rhodes, J. Wanna (2009)
BRINGING THE POLITICS BACK IN: PUBLIC VALUE IN WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENTARY GOVERNMENTPublic Administration, 87
Ida Lindgren, Gabriella Jansson (2013)
Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual frameworkGov. Inf. Q., 30
A. Meijer (2015)
E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategiesGov. Inf. Q., 32
S. Hoe (2016)
Defining a smart nation: the case of SingaporeJ. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc., 14
F. Bélanger, Lemuria Carter (2008)
Trust and Risk in eGovernment AdoptionJ. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 17
Jing Zhang, G. Cid, José Gil-García (2015)
Creating public value through Open Government: Perspectives, experiences and applicationsInf. Polity, 20
Hung, M. Jen (2012)
Building Citizen-centred E-government in Taiwan: Problems and Prospects (发展以公民为核心的电子化政府-台湾的经验与启示)1Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71
(2016)
United Nations e-government survey
Sang Lee, Taewon Hwang, Dong-Kook Choi (2012)
Open innovation in the public sector of leading countriesManagement Decision, 50
G. Stoker (2006)
Public Value ManagementThe American Review of Public Administration, 36
J. Criado, J. Gil-Garcia (2013)
Electronic Government and Public Policy Current Status and Future Trends
Glenn Hui, M. Hayllar (2010)
Creating Public Value in E‐Government: A Public‐Private‐Citizen Collaboration Framework in Web 2.0Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69
Sherry Arnstein's (2020)
Ladder of Citizen Participation
H. Gjermundrød, I. Dionysiou (2015)
A conceptual framework for configurable privacy-awareness in a citizen-centric eGovernmentElectron. Gov. an Int. J., 11
J. Chen, Roppe Jubilado, Erik Capistrano, David Yen (2015)
Factors affecting online tax filing - An application of the IS Success Model and trust theoryComput. Hum. Behav., 43
L. Luna-Reyes, J. Gil-Garcia, G. Romero (2012)
Towards a multidimensional model for evaluating electronic government: Proposing a more comprehensive and integrative perspectiveGov. Inf. Q., 29
The relationship between citizens and government has been gradually changing from government centered to citizen centered. These changes can be understood from the public value perspective, which is a promising way to foster the use of electronic services (e-services) by citizens. The purpose of this paper is to analyze how key drivers for public value creation can enhance adopting electronic public services by citizens. The use of e-services as a basis for applying smart technologies is also discussed.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative study based on both a systematic literature review and a case study of an e-service provided by a Brazilian state government.FindingsThe study identifies that creating public value happens only after adopting e-services and that public value can be perceived directly by those who use the service or indirectly by the observation of people who have adopted it. A two-dimensional framework showing the direct and indirect factors that drive public value creation is proposed based on the data collection and literature review.Research limitations/implicationsThe proposed conceptual framework remains untested and the data collection in the Brazilian context might be a limitation. Other studies could gather data based on the collective uses of e-services.Originality/valueThe framework can be used in other studies concerning public value creation. Public managers might consider its drivers when planning e-services as a way to link them to social, political and collective issues in addition to smart technologies.
International Journal of Public Sector Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 12, 2019
Keywords: Drivers; Public value; Key drivers; Electronic services; Electronic services adoption; Public value creation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.