Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Kamara (2002)
Capturing client requirements in construction projects
R. Wyatt, Jim Smith (2000)
Digital simulation of option-choice behaviourComputers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24
A. Othman, T. Hassan, C. Pasquire (2004)
Drivers for dynamic brief development in constructionEngineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11
Stuart Green (1996)
A metaphorical analysis of client organizations and the briefing processConstruction Management and Economics, 14
A. Gardiner, T. Gowers (2008)
The art of problem solving
J. Lampel, Henry Mintzberg, J. Quinn, S. Ghoshal (1991)
The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, Cases
P. Barrett, C. Stanley (1999)
Better Construction Briefing
Jim Smith, R. Wyatt (2003)
Strategic client briefing using performance indicators: A case study
T. Hindle (1990)
Rational Analysis for a Problematic WorldJournal of the Operational Research Society, 41
Jim Smith, R. Wyatt, N. Jackson (2003)
A method for strategic client briefingFacilities, 21
J. Kamara, C. Anumba, N. Evbuomwan (1999)
Client Requirements Processing in Construction: A New Approach Using QFDJournal of Architectural Engineering, 5
K. Popper, M. Notturno (1997)
The Myth of the Framework : In Defence of Science and RationalityCanadian Journal of Sociology-cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie, 22
Jim Smith, N. Jackson (2000)
Strategic needs analysis: its role in brief developmentFacilities, 18
K. Popper (1994)
The Myth of the Framework
N. Lichfield, Peter Kettle, M. Whitbread (1975)
Evaluation in the planning process
S. Austin, A. Baldwin, Baizhan Li, Paul Waskett (2000)
Analytical design planning technique (ADePT): a dependency structure matrix tool to schedule the building design processConstruction Management and Economics, 18
R. Woodhead, Jim Smith (2002)
The decision to build and the organisationStructural Survey, 20
Jim Smith, P. Love, R. Wyatt (2001)
To build or not to build? Assessing the strategic needs of construction industry clients and their stakeholdersStructural Survey, 19
Stuart Green (1992)
A SMART methodology for value management
E. Forman (1990)
Multi Criteria Decision Making and the Analytic Hierarchy Process
T. Saaty (1985)
Decision making for leadersIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-15
R. Wyatt, Jim Smith, P. Love (2004)
Philosophical Differences: The Case of Architects' Reluctance to Use Strategic Planning SoftwareSystemic Practice and Action Research, 17
R. Wyatt (1999)
Computer-aided policymaking : lessons from strategic planning software
Stuart Green (1990)
The essentials of value engineeringFacilities, 8
Anthony White (1986)
Strategic management
P. Checkland, J. Scholes (1990)
Soft Systems Methodology in Action
Jim Smith, P. Love (2004)
Stakeholder Management during Project Inception: Strategic Needs AnalysisJournal of Architectural Engineering, 10
R. Woodhead (2000)
Investigation of the early stages of project formulationFacilities, 18
Jiaqin Yang, Huei Lee (1997)
AN AHP DECISION MODEL FOR FACILITY LOCATION SELECTIONFacilities, 15
J. Kamara, C. Anumba (2001)
A critical appraisal of the briefing process in constructionJournal of Construction Research
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus on the intense research activity with regard to the project inception stage. The need to establish the project parameters and performance requirements is crucial to the success of any construction project. Many organizations have been developing approaches to assist everyone involved in this process. This study aims to provide some data on one approach used by the authors during these early stages. Design/methodology/approach – One approach to these early stages of the project is the use of a workshop‐based technique termed “strategic needs analysis”. Strategic needs analysis assists in these critical inception stages in the development of a project. Six action research studies based on these workshops were organized and analyzed by the authors. This has resulted in the development of a series of decision‐making attributes that capture the key characteristics relevant to the project inception stages. Findings – This paper analyzes and identifies on a two‐dimensional scale the best‐ and worst‐performing of the identified attributes classified by the stakeholders in each study. Research limitations/implications – The conclusions to this research suggest that working during these early inception stages with briefing workshops is both challenging and difficult. Practical implications – The findings provide a springboard for pointing out how an ambitious approach like this will always lead to practical implementation problems. It also provides data to indicate where one can begin to try to overcome these deficiencies. Originality/value – Data analysis and experience on this key stage of a project are now available to inform future researchers and practitioners in this complex but important area of activity.
Facilities – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 23, 2008
Keywords: Project brief; Performance measures; Strategic management
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.