Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Po-Pui Chung, Kwok Leung (1988)
Effects of Performance Information and Physical Attractiveness on Managerial Decisions about PromotionJournal of Social Psychology, 128
J. Kessels, R. Harrison (1998)
External Consistency: The Key to Success in Management Development Programmes?Management Learning, 29
R. Bert (2006)
Book Review: \IThe World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century\N by Thomas L. Friedman. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005Civil Engineering, 76
Phillip Armour (2006)
The learning edgeCommunications of the ACM, 49
R. By (2005)
Organisational change management: A critical reviewJournal of Change Management, 5
M. Higgs, D. Rowland (2005)
All changes great and small: Exploring approaches to change and its leadershipJournal of Change Management, 5
C.O. Longenecker, S. Ariss
Who goes and who stays
J. Kotter (2009)
Leading change: why transformation efforts failIEEE Engineering Management Review, 37
A. Price (2006)
The leading edge: Developing leaders in volatile timesEmployment Relations Today, 33
Layna Mosley, Thomas Friedman (2006)
The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First CenturyInternational Journal, 61
P. Drucker (1992)
Management Challenges for the 21st Century
Clinton Longenecker, J. Simonetti (2001)
Getting Results: Five Absolutes for High Performance
Purpose – This paper aims to determine the key criteria used by managers in rapidly changing organizations to make promotion decisions. Design/methodology/approach – A survey was conducted of 311 managers from over 100 different US service and manufacturing enterprises experiencing rapid organizational change. Managers were asked to identify no more than five factors that were most critical in their organization to actually getting promoted. Results were content analyzed. Findings – Top ten factors influencing promotion decisions included: getting desired results/strong performance track record; possessing strong business networks; interpersonal/communication skills; strong knowledge‐experience base; demonstrating a strong work ethic; ability to build teams and being a team player; personality, attitude, and ego factors; solving a major problem or getting a “big hit;” demonstrating character, integrity, and trustworthiness; and, preparation and being in the right place at the right time. Research limitations/implications – Results indicate what organizations are currently using to make decisions but it does not provide a normative guide for what organizations should be using. Also, further research should attempt to differentiate dimensions used at each level of management. Practical implications – The results provide a useful guide for managers who are looking for a leg up in the competitive fight for promotions. Results also suggest criteria to be considered when organizations update management assessment tools to better reflect the demands on managers working in the new global business environment. Originality/value – The study focuses on promotions in rapidly changing organizations and uses a sample that is very familiar with how organizations actually make promotion decisions.
Career Development International – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 9, 2008
Keywords: Promotional methods; Decision making; Manufacturing industries; United States of America
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.