Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Job demands, job resources and meaning at work

Job demands, job resources and meaning at work Purpose – This paper aims to identify longitudinal associations between job demands, job resources and experience of meaning at work. Design/methodolgy/approach – Using data from a longitudinal survey study among 6,299 employees in Danish eldercare who were divided into 301 work‐groups, experience of meaning at work was predicted from a series of job demands and job resources measured at individual level and group level. Findings – A combination of individual‐level and group‐level measures of job demands and job resources contributed to predicting meaning at work. Meaning at work at follow‐up was predicted by meaning at work at baseline, role ambiguity, quality of leadership, and influence at work at individual level and emotional demands at group level. Individual‐level measures of job demands and job resources proved stronger predictors of meaning at work than group‐level measures. Research limitations/implications – Psychosocial job demands and job resources predict experience of meaning at work. Practical implications – Experience of meaning at work constitutes an important organizational resource by contributing to the capacities of employees to deal with work‐related stresses and strains, while maintaining their health and well‐being. Social implications – Experience of meaning at work is positively associated with well‐being and reduces risk for long‐term sickness absence and turnover. Attention towards enhancing employee experiences of meaning at work may contribute towards the ability of western societies to recruit the necessary supply of labour over the coming decades. Originality/value – This is the first study to provide longitudinal, multi‐level evidence on the association between job demands, job resources and experience of meaning at work. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Managerial Psychology Emerald Publishing

Job demands, job resources and meaning at work

Thomas Clausen; Vilhelm Borg
Journal of Managerial Psychology , Volume 26 (8): 17 – Nov 8, 2011
Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/job-demands-job-resources-and-meaning-at-work-dtzzPYHMc0
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0268-3946
DOI
10.1108/02683941111181761
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to identify longitudinal associations between job demands, job resources and experience of meaning at work. Design/methodolgy/approach – Using data from a longitudinal survey study among 6,299 employees in Danish eldercare who were divided into 301 work‐groups, experience of meaning at work was predicted from a series of job demands and job resources measured at individual level and group level. Findings – A combination of individual‐level and group‐level measures of job demands and job resources contributed to predicting meaning at work. Meaning at work at follow‐up was predicted by meaning at work at baseline, role ambiguity, quality of leadership, and influence at work at individual level and emotional demands at group level. Individual‐level measures of job demands and job resources proved stronger predictors of meaning at work than group‐level measures. Research limitations/implications – Psychosocial job demands and job resources predict experience of meaning at work. Practical implications – Experience of meaning at work constitutes an important organizational resource by contributing to the capacities of employees to deal with work‐related stresses and strains, while maintaining their health and well‐being. Social implications – Experience of meaning at work is positively associated with well‐being and reduces risk for long‐term sickness absence and turnover. Attention towards enhancing employee experiences of meaning at work may contribute towards the ability of western societies to recruit the necessary supply of labour over the coming decades. Originality/value – This is the first study to provide longitudinal, multi‐level evidence on the association between job demands, job resources and experience of meaning at work.

Journal

Journal of Managerial Psychology – Emerald Publishing

Published: Nov 8, 2011

Keywords: Meaning at work; Psychosocial work environment; Job demands‐resource model; Longitudinal analysis; Multi‐level analysis; Eldercare services; Denmark; Older workers; Work identity

References

  • Health promoting factors at work: the sense of coherence
    Antonovsky, A.
  • Transformational leadership and psychological well‐being: the mediating role of meaningful work
    Arnold, K.A.; Turner, N.; Barling, J.; Kelloway, E.K.; McKee, M.C.
  • The job demands‐resources model: state of the art
    Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E.
  • The pursuit of meaningfulness in life
    Baumeister, R.F.; Vohs, K.D.
  • Role clarity, work overload and organizational support: multilevel evidence of the importance of support
    Bliese, P.D.; Castro, C.A.
  • Incorporating multiple levels of analysis into occupational stress research
    Bliese, P.D.; Jex, S.M.
  • Psychosocial work characteristics as predictors for burnout: findings from 3‐year follow up of the PUMA study
    Borritz, M.; Bültmann, U.; Rugulies, R.; Christensen, K.B.; Villadsen, E.; Kristensen, T.S.
  • A meta‐analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement
    Brown, S.P.
  • An emerging construct of meaningful work
    Chalofsky, N.
  • Organizational commitment and meaning at work
    Clausen, T.; Borg, V.
  • Do positive work‐related states mediate the association between psychosocial work characteristics and turnover? A longitudinal analysis
    Clausen, T.; Borg, V.
  • Psychosocial work characteristics as predictors of affective organisational commitment: a longitudinal multi‐level analysis of occupational well‐being
    Clausen, T.; Borg, V.