Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Ven, A. Delbecq, R. Koenig (1976)
Determinants of Coordination Modes within OrganizationsAmerican Sociological Review, 41
O. Williamson (1983)
Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support ExchangeThe American Economic Review, 73
M. Frigotto, A. Rossi (2012)
Diversity and Communication in Teams: Improving Problem-Solving or Creating Confusion?Group Decision and Negotiation, 21
Nicolaj Siggelkow (2011)
Firms as Systems of Interdependent ChoicesERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes (Topic)
Giovanni Gavetti, Daniel Levinthal (2000)
Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential SearchAdministrative Science Quarterly, 45
R. Hastie, T. Kameda (2005)
The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions.Psychological review, 112 2
Daniel Levinthal (1997)
Adaptation on rugged landscapesManagement Science, 43
T. Kameda, R. Hastie, Takafumi Tsukasaki, N. Berg (2010)
Democracy Under Uncertainty: The ‘Wisdom of Crowds’ and the Free-Rider Problem in Group Decision MakingGame Theory & Bargaining Theory eJournal
Jan Rivkin, Nicolaj Siggelkow (2003)
Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational DesignManag. Sci., 49
Bertolt Meyer, W. Scholl (2009)
Complex Problem Solving after Unstructured Discussion: Effects of Information Distribution and ExperienceGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12
F. Ritter, M. Schoelles, K. Quigley, L. Klein (2011)
Determining the number of simulation runs: Treating simulations as theories by not sampling their behavior
Richard Larrick, Jack Soll (2006)
Intuitions About Combining Opinions: Misappreciation of the Averaging PrincipleManag. Sci., 52
S. Wood, G. Michaelides, C. Thomson (2011)
Team approach, idea generation, conflict and performanceTeam Performance Management, 17
Charles Manz, Christopher Neck (1995)
Teamthink: beyond the groupthink syndrome in self‐managing work teamsJournal of Managerial Psychology, 10
G. Gigerenzer, R. Selten (2000)
Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolboxInternational Journal of Psychology, 35
Norbert Kerr, R. Tindale (2011)
Group-based forecasting?: A social psychological analysisInternational Journal of Forecasting, 27
Julija Mell, D. Knippenberg, W. Ginkel (2014)
The catalyst effect: : The impact of transactive memory system structure on team performanceAcademy of Management Journal, 57
Sendil Ethiraj, Daniel Levinthal (2009)
Hoping for A to Z While Rewarding Only A: Complex Organizations and Multiple GoalsIO: Firm Structure
D. Secchi, Emanuele Bardone (2009)
Super-docility in organizations: an evolutionary modelInternational Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 12
K. Richardson (2006)
Emergence: Complexity & Organization
D. Kahneman (2003)
Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral EconomicsThe American Economic Review, 93
Diane Rulke, J. Galaskiewicz (2000)
Distribution of Knowledge, Group Network Structure, and Group PerformanceManagement Science, 46
D. Jonassen (2000)
Toward a design theory of problem solvingEducational Technology Research and Development, 48
A. Edmondson, Ingrid Nembhard (2009)
Product Development and Learning in Project Teams: The Challenges Are the Benefits*Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26
Sze‐Sze Wong (2008)
Task knowledge overlap and knowledge variety: the role of advice network structures and impact on group effectivenessJournal of Organizational Behavior, 29
H. Simon (1997)
Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason
I. Nonaka (1994)
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge CreationOrganization Science, 5
Lihua Chen
Condorcet Winners for Public Goods
Martin Ganco, Rajshree Agarwal (2007)
Performance Differentials between Diversifying Entrants and Entrepreneurial Start-Ups: A Complexity ApproachEntrepreneurship & Management eJournal
K. Madani, L. Read, Laleh Shalikarian (2014)
Voting Under Uncertainty: A Stochastic Framework for Analyzing Group Decision Making ProblemsWater Resources Management, 28
B. Srdjevic, Matija Pipan, Z. Srdjevic, B. Blagojević, T. Zoranović (2013)
Virtually combining the analytical hierarchy process and voting methods in order to make group decisionsUniversal Access in the Information Society, 14
L. Kester, A. Griffin, E. Hultink, K. Lauche (2011)
Exploring Portfolio Decision‐Making Processes*Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28
J. Espinosa, S. Slaughter, Robert Kraut, J. Herbsleb (2007)
Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software DevelopmentOrgan. Sci., 18
W. Bianco, M. Lynch, G. Miller, I. Sened (2006)
“A Theory Waiting to Be Discovered and Used”: A Reanalysis of Canonical Experiments on Majority-Rule Decision MakingThe Journal of Politics, 68
Steven Postrel (2002)
Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Islands of Shared Knowledge: Specialization and Mutual Understanding in Problem-Solving TeamsOrgan. Sci., 13
J. Nickerson, Todd Zenger (2004)
A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm - A Problem-solving PerspectiveIO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets
Mei-Hsiang Wang, Shih-Che Lin, T. Yang (2013)
Understanding the Antecedents of Team Performance: The Importance of a Expertise-Centered CoordinationAsia-Pacific Management Review, 19
Jan Rivkin, Nicolaj Siggelkow (2002)
Organizational sticking points on NK LandscapesComplex., 7
Silvia Bonaccio, R. Dalal (2006)
Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciencesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101
D. Hofmann (2015)
Overcoming the obstacles to cross-functional decision making: Laying the groundwork for collaborative problem solvingOrganizational Dynamics, 44
Nicolaj Siggelkow, Jan Rivkin (2005)
Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and ComplexityOrgan. Sci., 16
S. Mohammed, Brad Dumville (2001)
Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundariesJournal of Organizational Behavior, 22
Beth Bechky (2003)
Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production FloorOrgan. Sci., 14
M. Marks, S. Zaccaro, J. Mathieu (2000)
Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments.The Journal of applied psychology, 85 6
Charles Miller (1985)
Group decision making under majority and unanimity decision rulesSocial Psychology Quarterly, 48
M. Cornelison, H. Filla, A. Stanley, B. Rapraeger, Olwin, A Sacco, R. Doyonnas, P. Kraft, S. Vitorovic, H. Blau, W Callister, M Lutolf, K. Havenstrite, K. Koleckar, F Grand, A. Jones, V. Seale, A. Scimè, Martina Rudnicki, J. Sly, R. Miller, S. Kobal, S. Gobaa, A. Barron, F. Rossi, J. Och, Karin Engbloms, Stipendiefond k, Bio, B. Bahrami, Karsten Olsen, P. Latham, A. Roepstorff, G. Rees, C. Frith
References and Notes Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S11 References Movie S1 Optimally Interacting Minds R�ports
M. Fiorina, C. Plott (1978)
Committee Decisions under Majority Rule: An Experimental StudyAmerican Political Science Review, 72
Carola Jungwirth, Petra Moog (2004)
Selection and support strategies in venture capital financing: high-tech or low-tech, hands-off or hands-on?Venture Capital, 6
Natalia Cruz, V. Pérez, Y. Ramos (2007)
Transactive memory processes that lead to better team resultsTeam Performance Management, 13
Deborah Ancona, D. Caldwell (1992)
Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team PerformanceOrganization Science, 3
S. Kauffman (1991)
Origins of Order: self-organization and selection in evolution
M. Basadur, G. Gelade, Tim Basadur (2014)
Creative Problem-Solving Process Styles, Cognitive Work Demands, and Organizational AdaptabilityThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50
Jiao Zhang, Christopher Hsee, Zhixing Xiao (2006)
The Majority Rule in Individual Decision MakingBehavioral & Experimental Economics
David Hoopes, Steven Postrel (1999)
Shared knowledge, “glitches,” and product development performanceStrategic Management Journal, 20
Mathias Risse (2004)
Arguing for Majority RuleJournal of Political Philosophy, 12
Brian Urlacher (2014)
Groups, Decision Rules, and Negotiation Outcomes: Simulating the Negotiator's DilemmaNegotiation Journal, 30
F. Brodbeck, Rudolf Kerschreiter, A. Mojzisch, S. Schulz-Hardt (2007)
Group Decision Making Under Conditions of Distributed Knowledge: The Information Asymmetries Model.Academy of Management Review, 32
Simon Rodan, D. Galunic (2004)
More than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness
Integration Author, Robert Grant
Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Environments: Organizational Capability a S Knowledge Integration
G. Gigerenzer, W. Gaissmaier (2011)
Heuristic decision making.Annual review of psychology, 62
Kyle Lewis, Benjamin Herndon (2011)
Transactive Memory Systems: Current Issues and Future Research DirectionsOrgan. Sci., 22
S. Hug (1999)
Nonunitary Actors in Spatial ModelsJournal of Conflict Resolution, 43
G. Allen (1982)
Formal Decision Theory and Majority RuleEthics, 92
Yi-Ching Liu, P. McLeod (2014)
Individual Preference for Procedural Order and Process Accountability in Group Problem-SolvingSmall Group Research, 45
José Torre-Ruiz, J. Aragón-Correa, Vera Ferrón‐Vílchez (2011)
Job‐related skill heterogeneity and action team performanceManagement Decision, 49
Vikas Aggarwal, Nicolaj Siggelkow, Harbir Singh (2011)
Governing collaborative activity: interdependence and the impact of coordination and explorationSouthern Medical Journal, 32
Kyle Lewis (2004)
Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory SystemsManag. Sci., 50
S. Bell, Anton Villado, Marc Lukasik, L. Belau, Andrea Briggs (2011)
Getting Specific about Demographic Diversity Variable and Team Performance Relationships: A Meta-AnalysisJournal of Management, 37
M. Shubik, R. Cyert, J. March (1964)
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60
Manuel Sosa, S. Eppinger, C. Rowles (2004)
Sloan School of Management Working Paper On-line Supplement To: the Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development
A. Martynov, Z. Zhao (2010)
High-performance work practices and knowledge creation in organisationsInternational Journal of Strategic Change Management, 2
L. Houghton (2015)
Engaging Alternative Cognitive Pathways for Taming Wicked ProblemsEmergence: Complexity and Organization, 17
R. Sorkin, R. West, D. Robinson (1998)
Group Performance Depends on the Majority RulePsychological Science, 9
H. Simon (1990)
A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism.Science, 250 4988
Felipe Csaszar, J. Eggers (2012)
Organizational Decision Making: An Information Aggregation ViewO&M: Structures & Processes in Organizations eJournal
D. Secchi (2015)
A case for agent-based models in organizational behavior and team researchTeam Performance Management, 21
H. Simon (1991)
The Architecture of Complexity, 106
Purpose – This paper aims to evaluate the effect of knowledge overlap, search width and problem complexity on the quality of problem-solving in teams that use the majority rule to aggregate heterogeneous knowledge of the team members. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses agent-based simulations to model iterative problem-solving by teams. The simulation results are analyzed using linear regressions to show the interactions among the variables in the model. Findings – We find that knowledge overlap, search width and problem complexity interact to jointly impact the optimal solution in the iterative problem-solving process of teams using majority rule decisions. Interestingly, we find that more complex problems require less knowledge overlap. Search width and knowledge overlap act as substitutes, weakening each other’s performance effects. Research limitations/implications – The results suggest that team performance in iterative problem-solving depends on interactions among knowledge overlap, search width and problem complexity which need to be jointly examined to reflect realistic team dynamics. Practical implications – The findings suggest that team formation and the choice of a search strategy should be aligned with problem complexity. Originality/value – This paper contributes to the literature on problem-solving in teams. It is the first attempt to use agent-based simulations to model complex problem-solving in teams. The results have both theoretical and practical significance.
Team Performance Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 14, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.