Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Levi, A. Doig, R. Gundur, D. Wall, M. Williams (2016)
The implications of economic cybercrime for policing
Cassandra Cross (2018)
Expectations vs reality: Responding to online fraud across the fraud justice networkInternational Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Cassandra Cross, Michael Kelly (2016)
The problem of ‘white noise’: Examining current prevention approaches to online fraud
(2018)
Number of Hongkongers falling prey to online romance scams surges almost 250 per cent
Dima Saber, N. Webber (1998)
Corresponding Author:
(2013)
The interplay of borders, turf, cyberspace and jurisdiction: issues confronting US law enforcement
(2018)
Targeting scams: report of the ACCC on scam activity 2017
Mark Button, Jacki Tapley, C. Lewis (2013)
The ‘fraud justice network’ and the infra-structure of support for individual fraud victims in England and WalesCriminology & Criminal Justice, 13
T. Holt, A. Bossler, S. Fitzgerald (2013)
Examining State and Local Law Enforcement Perceptions of Computer Crime
Cassandra Cross, Dom Blackshaw (2015)
Improving the Police Response to Online FraudPolicing-an International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 9
(2018)
Fraud facts – recognize, reject, report fraud
A. Powell, G. Stratton, R. Cameron (2018)
Digital Criminology
The little black book of Scams
J. King, A. Doig (2016)
A dedicated place for volume fraud within the current UK economic crime agendaJournal of Financial Crime, 23
Cassandra Cross, K. Richards, Russell Smith (2016)
The Reporting Experiences and Support Needs of Victims of Online FraudTrends and issues in crime and criminal justice
(2018)
2017 Internet crime report
T. Holt, A. Bossler (2012)
Predictors of Patrol Officer Interest in Cybercrime Training and Investigation in Selected United States Police DepartmentsCyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 15 9
Diarmaid Harkin, C. Whelan, Lennon Chang (2018)
The challenges facing specialist police cyber-crime units: an empirical analysisPolice Practice and Research, 19
D. Svantesson (2016)
Internet jurisdiction: Today and in the future.
M. Whitty, T. Buchanan (2012)
The psychology of the online dating romance scam
(2006)
Final report
Russell Smith (2008)
Coordinating individual and organisational responses to fraudCrime, Law and Social Change, 49
Rick Brown, Anthony Morgan, Marcus Smith, Monique Mann (2015)
Evaluation of the Australian Cybercrime Online Reporting Network: Consultancy Report for the CrimTrac Agency
S. Brenner (2006)
Cybercrime jurisdictionCrime, Law and Social Change, 46
T. Holt, George Burruss, A. Bossler (2019)
An examination of English and Welsh constables’ perceptions of the seriousness and frequency of online incidentsPolicing and Society, 29
L. Hadlington, K. Lumsden, A. Black, F. Ferra (2018)
A Qualitative Exploration of Police Officers’ Experiences, Challenges, and Perceptions of CybercrimePolicing: A Journal of Policy and Practice
(2010)
The Human Cost of Fraud: A Vox Populi, Centre for Counter Fraud Studies
A. Morgan, C. Dowling, R. Browns, M. Mann, I. Vice, M. Smith (2016)
Evaluation of the Australian cybercrime online reporting network
M. Whitty, T. Buchanan (2012)
The Psychology of the Online Dating Romance Scam Report (University of Leicester)
Competition Canada (2017)
Archived — Fraud Facts 2017—Recognize, Reject, Report Fraud
Dale Willits, Jeffrey Nowacki (2016)
The use of specialized cybercrime policing units: an organizational analysisCriminal Justice Studies, 29
Cassandra Cross, Molly Dragiewicz, K. Richards (2018)
Understanding Romance Fraud: Insights From Domestic Violence ResearchBritish Journal of Criminology, 58
Mark Button, C. Nicholls, J. Kerr, R. Owen (2014)
Online frauds: Learning from victims why they fall for these scamsAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 47
Mark Button, K. Frimpong, Geoffrey Smith, L. Johnston (2007)
Professionalizing Counter Fraud Specialists in the UK: Assessing Progress and Recommendations for ReformCrime Prevention and Community Safety, 9
A. Bossler, T. Holt (2012)
Patrol officers' perceived role in responding to cybercrimePolicing-an International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 35
(2017)
Specialization of criminal justice authorities in dealing with cybercrime
S. Hinduja, J. Schafer (2009)
US cybercrime units on the world wide webPolicing-an International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 32
N. Fletcher (2007)
Challenges for regulating financial fraud in cyberspaceJournal of Financial Crime, 14
Mark Button (2012)
Cross‐border fraud and the case for an “Interfraud”Policing-an International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 35
(2013)
Cybercrime and Society, 2nd ed., Sage, London
R. Gannon, A. Doig (2010)
Ducking the answer? Fraud strategies and police resourcesPolicing and Society, 20
(2018)
Crime in England and wales: additional tables on fraud and cybercrime
T. Holt, A. Bossler (2012)
Police Perceptions of Computer Crimes in Two Southeastern Cities: An Examination from the Viewpoint of Patrol OfficersAmerican Journal of Criminal Justice, 37
S. Hinduja (2004)
Perceptions of local and state law enforcement concerning the role of computer crime investigative teamsPolicing-an International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 27
K. Frimpong, P. Baker (2007)
Fighting Public Sector Fraud: The Growth of Professionalism in Counter-Fraud InvestigatorsCrime Prevention and Community Safety, 9
A. Doig, S. Johnson, M. Levi (2001)
New Public Management, Old Populism and the Policing of FraudPublic Policy and Administration, 16
(2017)
Cyber fraud, Scams and Their Victims
Fraud is not a new offence. However, the recent evolution and proliferation of technologies (predominantly the internet) has seen offenders increasingly use virtual environments to target and defraud victims worldwide. Several studies have examined the ways that fraud is perpetrated with a clear demarcation between terrestrial and cyber offences. However, with moves towards the notion of a “digital society” and recognition that technology is increasingly embedded across all aspects of our lives, it is important to consider if there is any advantage in categorising fraud against the type of environment it is perpetrated in. This paper aims to discuss these issues.Design/methodology/approachThis paper examines the perceived utility of differentiating online and offline fraud offences. It is based upon the insights of thirty-one professionals who work within the “fraud justice network” across London, UK and Toronto, Canada.FindingsIt highlights both the realities faced by professionals in seeking to ether maintain or collapse such a differentiation in their everyday jobs and the potential benefits and challenges that result.Practical implicationsOverall, the paper argues that the majority of professionals did not feel a distinction was necessary and instead felt that an arbitrary divide was instead a hindrance to their activities. However, while not useful on a practical front, there was perceived benefit regarding government, funding and the media. The implications of this moving forward are considered.Originality/valueThis paper provides new insights into how fraud justice network professionals understand the distinction between fraud offences perpetrated across both online and offline environments.
Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 9, 2019
Keywords: Police; Victims; Fraud; Cybercrime; Digital society; Fraud justice network
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.