Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Is offense worth more than defense and pitching? Marginal revenue product and revenue sharing in major league baseball

Is offense worth more than defense and pitching? Marginal revenue product and revenue sharing in... Sports economists have consistently found that winning positively impacts team revenue fans prefer to allocate their entertainment dollars to winning teams. Previous research has also found that fans do not have a preference for how their team wins. However, this research ignores the significant variability in revenue that can exist between teams with similar attendance figures. The authors contribute to the literature by testing whether profit maximizing teams should pay different amounts for different types of production by estimating the marginal revenue product of a win due to offense, defense and pitching.Design/methodology/approachUsing data from the 2010–2017 Major League Baseball seasons and an Ordinary Least Squares-Fixed Effects approach, the authors test whether a unit of offensive, defensive and pitching production generates differing amounts of team revenue both before and after revenue sharing. The authors then test if team Wins Above Replacement is a good approximation of actual wins while accounting for the previously observed nonlinear relationship between wins and revenue.FindingsThe authors found that marginal revenue product estimates in the postrevenue sharing model for mowar, pwar and dwar are nearly identical to each other. Further, after predicting prerevenue sharing, the authors find that fans have no preference for mowar, pwar or dwar play styles.Originality/valueThe findings illustrate that team decision-makers appear to be acting irrationally by paying more for offense than they do for defense. Thus, the findings suggest that team decision-makers should value defensive wins and pitching wins at the same rate as offensive wins on the free agent market. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Managerial Finance Emerald Publishing

Is offense worth more than defense and pitching? Marginal revenue product and revenue sharing in major league baseball

Ehrlich, Justin Andrew; Potter, Joel M.
Managerial Finance , Volume 47 (6): 19 – Jun 3, 2021
Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/is-offense-worth-more-than-defense-and-pitching-marginal-revenue-yDnrsumKQG
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0307-4358
DOI
10.1108/mf-04-2020-0210
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Sports economists have consistently found that winning positively impacts team revenue fans prefer to allocate their entertainment dollars to winning teams. Previous research has also found that fans do not have a preference for how their team wins. However, this research ignores the significant variability in revenue that can exist between teams with similar attendance figures. The authors contribute to the literature by testing whether profit maximizing teams should pay different amounts for different types of production by estimating the marginal revenue product of a win due to offense, defense and pitching.Design/methodology/approachUsing data from the 2010–2017 Major League Baseball seasons and an Ordinary Least Squares-Fixed Effects approach, the authors test whether a unit of offensive, defensive and pitching production generates differing amounts of team revenue both before and after revenue sharing. The authors then test if team Wins Above Replacement is a good approximation of actual wins while accounting for the previously observed nonlinear relationship between wins and revenue.FindingsThe authors found that marginal revenue product estimates in the postrevenue sharing model for mowar, pwar and dwar are nearly identical to each other. Further, after predicting prerevenue sharing, the authors find that fans have no preference for mowar, pwar or dwar play styles.Originality/valueThe findings illustrate that team decision-makers appear to be acting irrationally by paying more for offense than they do for defense. Thus, the findings suggest that team decision-makers should value defensive wins and pitching wins at the same rate as offensive wins on the free agent market.

Journal

Managerial Finance – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 3, 2021

Keywords: Baseball; Sports; Revenue; Salary; Player value; WAR

References

  • Houston astros: baseball's worst team is the most profitable in history
    Alexander, D.
  • José Bautista misses out on big payday, Re-signs with Toronto Blue Jays
    Berkon, B.
  • Salary determination in the presence of fixed revenues
    Berri, D.J.; Leeds, M.A.; von Allmen, P.
  • Determinants of revenue in sports leagues: an empirical assessment
    Bradbury, J.C.
  • How long a honeymoon? The effect of new stadiums on attendance in Major League Baseball
    Clapp, C.M.; Hakes, J.K.
  • Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models
    De Hoyos, R.E.; Sarafidis, V.
  • Baseball attendance and the designated hitter
    Domazlicky, B.R.; Kerr, P.M.
  • Testing for serial correlation in linear panel-data models
    Drukker, D.M.
  • The relative wages of offense and defense in the NBA: a setting for win-maximization arbitrage?
    Ehrlich, J.; Sanders, S.; Boudreaux, C.J.
  • Does a salary premium exist for offensive output in Major League Baseball?
    Ehrlich, J.; Perline, J.; Potter, J.; Sanders, S.
  • The consequences (and nonconsequences) of ownership change: the case of Major League Baseball
    Hersch, P.L.; Pelkowski, J.E.
  • Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence
    Hoechle, D.
  • Monopoly exploitation in professional sport: evidence from Major League Baseball position players, 2000–2011
    Humphreys, B.R.; Pyun, H.
  • Alternative mechanisms for corporate control
    Morck, R.; Shleifer, A.; Vishny, R.W.
  • Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients
    Paternoster, R.; Brame, R.; Mazerolle, P.; Piquero, A.
  • Revenue sharing in major league baseball: the moments that meant so much
    Rockerbie, D.; Easton, S.
  • The recent history of free-agent pricing
    Schwartz, M.
  • Herd behavior and investment
    Scharfstein, D.S.; Stein, J.C.
  • Financial incentives and league policy: the example of Major League Baseball's steroid policy
    Tainsky, S.; Winfree, J.A.
  • Location and attendance in major league baseball
    Winfree, J.A.; McCluskey, J.J.; Mittelhammer, R.C.; Fort, R.