Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Disalvo, M. Gregg, T. Lodato (2014)
Building belongingInteractions, 21
V. Naumov, Liubov Sharabaeva, Dmitry Kucherenko, Pavel Naumov (2021)
Planning an Information Project Portfolio for Developing Infrastructure of an E-Government in a Megapolis
Jianfeng Wen, Shixian Li, Zhiyong Lin, Yong Hu, Changqing Huang (2012)
Systematic literature review of machine learning based software development effort estimation modelsInf. Softw. Technol., 54
M. Jørgensen (2004)
A review of studies on expert estimation of software development effortJ. Syst. Softw., 70
Alexander Nolte (2019)
Touched by the Hackathon: a study on the connection between Hackathon participants and start-up foundersProceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Software-Intensive Business: Start-ups, Platforms, and Ecosystems
Peter Johnson, P. Robinson (2014)
Civic Hackathons: Innovation, Procurement, or Civic Engagement?Review of Policy Research, 31
S. Balakrishna (2020)
Is information technology education industry-relevant and gender-inclusive? Perspectives from Andhra Pradesh, IndiaIndustry and Higher Education, 35
(2021)
Electronic transaction aggregation and analysis layer
K. Vu, R. Proctor, Fredrick Garcia (2021)
WEBSITE DESIGN AND EVALUATIONHandbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics
Pinar Efe, Onur Demirörs (2019)
A change management model and its application in software development projectsComput. Stand. Interfaces, 66
(2017)
Software effort estimation using machine language techniques
C. López-Martín (2021)
Effort prediction for the software project construction phaseJournal of Software: Evolution and Process, 33
Kiev Gama (2017)
Preliminary Findings on Software Engineering Practices in Civic Hackathons2017 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on CrowdSourcing in Software Engineering (CSI-SE)
E. Almirall, J. Wareham (2015)
Open data and civic appsCommunications of the ACM, 59
Anastasija Nikiforova (2022)
Open data hackathon as a tool for increased engagement of Generation Z: to hack or not to hack?ArXiv, abs/2207.10974
Noorlela Marcheta, I. Hermadi, Yani Nurhadryani (2020)
EFFORT ESTIMATION MODELING OF E-GOVERNMENT APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT USING FUNCTION POINTS BASED ON TOR AND SRS DOCUMENTJournal of Information Technology and Its Utilization
T. Menzies, Ye Yang, George Mathew, B. Boehm, J. Hihn (2016)
Negative results for software effort estimationEmpirical Software Engineering, 22
Swarnima Gautam, Vrijendra Singh (2018)
The state‐of‐the‐art in software development effort estimationJournal of Software: Evolution and Process, 30
S. Carr, Allison Lassiter (2017)
Big Data, Small Apps: Premises and Products of the Civic Hackathon
S. Balakrishna (2018)
Government electronic services delivery and the digital divide: the case of Andhra Pradesh, IndiaADBI Working Paper 890, Asian Development Bank Institute
E. Jonas, J. Schleier-Smith, V. Sreekanti, C.C. Tsai, A. Khandelwal, Q. Pu, V. Shankar, J. Carreira, K. Krauth, N. Yadwadkar, J.E. Gonzalez (2019)
Cloud programming simplified: a Berkeley view on serverless computing
Matthew Perron, R. Fernandez, D. DeWitt, S. Madden (2019)
Starling: A Scalable Query Engine on Cloud FunctionsProceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data
Kjetil Moløkken, M. Jørgensen (2003)
A review of software surveys on software effort estimation2003 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2003. ISESE 2003. Proceedings.
S. Saeed, Noor Jhanjhi, M. Naqvi, M. Humayun (2019)
Analysis of Software Development MethodologiesInternational Journal of Computing and Digital Systems
Norman Jouppi, C. Young, Nishant Patil, David Patterson, Gaurav Agrawal, Raminder Bajwa, Sarah Bates, Suresh Bhatia, Nan Boden, Al Borchers, Rick Boyle, Pierre-luc Cantin, Clifford Chao, Chris Clark, Jeremy Coriell, Mike Daley, Matt Dau, Jeffrey Dean, Ben Gelb, Taraneh Ghaemmaghami, Rajendra Gottipati, William Gulland, Robert Hagmann, C. Ho, Doug Hogberg, John Hu, R. Hundt, Dan Hurt, Julian Ibarz, A. Jaffey, Alek Jaworski, Alexander Kaplan, Harshit Khaitan, Daniel Killebrew, Andy Koch, Naveen Kumar, Steve Lacy, James Laudon, James Law, Diemthu Le, Chris Leary, Zhuyuan Liu, Kyle Lucke, Alan Lundin, Gordon MacKean, Adriana Maggiore, Maire Mahony, Kieran Miller, R. Nagarajan, Ravi Narayanaswami, Ray Ni, Kathy Nix, Thomas Norrie, Mark Omernick, Narayana Penukonda, Andy Phelps, Jonathan Ross, Matt Ross, Amir Salek, Emad Samadiani, Chris Severn, Gregory Sizikov, Matthew Snelham, Jed Souter, Dan Steinberg, Andy Swing, Mercedes Tan, Gregory Thorson, Bo Tian, Horia Toma, Erick Tuttle, Vijay Vasudevan, Richard Walter, Walter Wang, Eric Wilcox, Doe Yoon (2017)
In-datacenter performance analysis of a tensor processing unit2017 ACM/IEEE 44th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA)
A. Saeed, Wasi Butt, Farwa Kazmi, Madeha Arif (2018)
Survey of Software Development Effort Estimation TechniquesProceedings of the 2018 7th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications
B. Wirtz, Steven Birkmeyer (2015)
Open Government: Origin, Development, and Conceptual PerspectivesInternational Journal of Public Administration, 38
M. Aguiar (2009)
Function Points or Use Case Points? method popular. A search for "use
T. Bovaird (2005)
Performance Measurement and Evaluation of E-Government and E-Governance Programmes and Initiatives
Martin Lnenicka, Anastasija Nikiforova (2021)
Transparency-by-design: What is the role of open data portals?Telematics Informatics, 61
T. Sharma, Anil Bhardwaj, Anita Sharma (2011)
A Comparative study of COCOMO II and Putnam models of Software Cost Estimation
Johann Schleier-Smith, Vikram Sreekanti, Anurag Khandelwal, J. Carreira, N. Yadwadkar, R. Popa, Joseph Gonzalez, I. Stoica, D. Patterson (2021)
What serverless computing is and should becomeCommunications of the ACM, 64
M. Shepperd, G. Kadoda (2001)
Comparing Software Prediction Techniques Using SimulationIEEE Trans. Software Eng., 27
F. Savo (2021)
High software maintenance fees and what to do about them
Xiaotie Qin, Miao Fang (2011)
Summarization of Software Cost EstimationProcedia Engineering, 15
Thomas Schmidt, Anastasiia Mosiienko, Raffaela Faber, Juliane Herzog, Christian Wolff (2020)
Utilizing HTML‐analysis and computer vision on a corpus of website screenshots to investigate design developments on the webProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57
Przemyslaw Pospieszny, Beata Czarnacka-Chrobot, A. Kobyliński (2018)
An effective approach for software project effort and duration estimation with machine learning algorithmsJ. Syst. Softw., 137
J. Matson, Bruce Barrett, J. Mellichamp (1994)
Software Development Cost Estimation Using Function PointsIEEE Trans. Software Eng., 20
A. Hassan, M.S. Khan (2021)
An effective nature-inspired approach for the estimation of software development costs
This paper aims to examine the process for estimation of efforts for software development and suggests a framework for estimating software development costs and ensuring quality of code in e-Government projects from the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. With no established processes for estimation of efforts, the Government relied on open bids from the market to develop these e-Government applications.Design/methodology/approachThe paper adopts an exploratory case study approach to analyze the e-Government applications in Andhra Pradesh. Using data from the information technology department of the Government of Andhra Pradesh, the paper evolves a framework to compute costs of software development, based on the software development life cycle.FindingsThe framework helps in arriving at a hurdle price before the tender process. The study has shown that an e-Government application in AP state would cost Rs. 224,000, or US$2,969.25, for a simple application, and Rs. 33,60,000, or US$44,538.71, for a complex application over a five-year period, depending on the complexity and size of the application. This information would be useful to the Government decision-makers for expanding e-Government.Research limitations/implicationsFurther research may assess the utility of this framework for e-Government support activities like automation of data centers, video conferencing facilities and ushering in financial technologies for encouraging cashless payments.Originality/valueThe paper provides information that could be of value at a national level (for India) and at the same time providing a guide for other countries that would like to adopt this framework.
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 25, 2023
Keywords: India; e-Government; Software development efforts estimation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.