Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Invited editorial Randomised controlled trials in children’s services 1 2 David J Torgerson and Carole J Torgerson Director of the York Trials Unit, University of York Reader in Evidence- Background variables, has led to an over- or under-estimate of based Education, effectiveness or, worse, suggested a possibility of University of York In this two-part special edition of the Journal of benefit when there is actually a possibility of harm. Children’s Services (Volume 3, issues 1 and 2) the use of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) takes centre A non-random history of RCTs stage. The RCT is the best method to assess a causal relationship between intervention and outcome Although the first known randomised trials were (Torgerson & Torgerson, 2008). The only other undertaken in the 1930s in the field of education method that can, in theory, provide an unbiased (Walters, 1931; 1932) – among undergraduate estimate of causality is the regression discontinuity students at Purdue University in the US – the first (RD) design (Shadish et al, 2002). However, it is much trial involving children was undertaken in 1936. This less efficient than an RCT and typically requires at study, again in the US, evaluated an intervention least 2.75
Journal of Children's Services – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 13, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.